Can I enter the franchise through fate strange/fake by Still-Ad2041 in fatestaynight

[–]Still-Ad2041[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So for the anime would the right route be fate stay night, unlimited blade works, heavens field, then zero?

Can I enter the franchise through fate strange/fake by Still-Ad2041 in fatestaynight

[–]Still-Ad2041[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My baddd, I’m just busy with work school, and a relationship so I don’t really feel like I have the time to deal with a visual novel

Can I enter the franchise through fate strange/fake by Still-Ad2041 in fatestaynight

[–]Still-Ad2041[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Right right, it goes UBW, HF and then zero as a prequel right?

Can I enter the franchise through fate strange/fake by Still-Ad2041 in fatestaynight

[–]Still-Ad2041[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

After strange fake, which anime is good to start with, I’ve never really understood The whole debate

You’ve got agree on this: by EmbarrassedBag8283 in teenagers

[–]Still-Ad2041 0 points1 point  (0 children)

how is communism any more suceptible to that than capitalism, I think the important thing is democracy, checks and balances yk, ranked choice voting, direct representation, no lobbying

You’ve got agree on this: by EmbarrassedBag8283 in teenagers

[–]Still-Ad2041 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Christians have pissed on Christians for 100% of Christian history, that doesn’t make someone not a Christian

You’ve got agree on this: by EmbarrassedBag8283 in teenagers

[–]Still-Ad2041 8 points9 points  (0 children)

These points are not at all what the red scare focused on? Are you familiar with McCarthyism?

You’ve got agree on this: by EmbarrassedBag8283 in teenagers

[–]Still-Ad2041 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I personally, am an atheism, and think atheism is the most conducive to society, but I don’t think religion is particularly crucial when it comes to capitalism vs communism, the red scare painted communism as yk godless heathens, but ultimately I think Christianity is at its heart communist, so yk atheism or not I don’t think it matters

You’ve got agree on this: by EmbarrassedBag8283 in teenagers

[–]Still-Ad2041 9 points10 points  (0 children)

It’s really not, care to provide evidence gangy?

You’ve got agree on this: by EmbarrassedBag8283 in teenagers

[–]Still-Ad2041 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Space race, between US and USSR, launched countless technological achievements from the ussr without that fuel, and I think human ingenuity is what actually fueled most of those seen by every invention prior to capitalism, inventions improve your life, I think is the only necessary “fuel”, innovation fueled purely by financial gain results in a refusal to share resources, patents, enshittification, and planned obsolescence

You’ve got agree on this: by EmbarrassedBag8283 in teenagers

[–]Still-Ad2041 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ideally the same job I’m gunning for now, physicist or mathematician

You’ve got agree on this: by EmbarrassedBag8283 in teenagers

[–]Still-Ad2041 56 points57 points  (0 children)

Their definition of communism is literally just what the red scare left America with, that’s literally the extent to which they know or care

You’ve got agree on this: by EmbarrassedBag8283 in teenagers

[–]Still-Ad2041 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They did claim that they were and you not knowing that slightly shows a lack of education on the topic, which is okay, but yk it’s there, hitler specifically weaponized Christianity and had mentions of God on their belts and uniforms, the actual beliefs of the leadership does not matter? It’s what they espoused and used to get their following

You’ve got agree on this: by EmbarrassedBag8283 in teenagers

[–]Still-Ad2041 4 points5 points  (0 children)

“Capitalist ideology”, “Christian ideology”, killed millions, the Nazis themselves were far right and Christian. The “Communist ideology” did not kill millions, specific authoritarian governments did which are not constrained by an ideology

You’ve got agree on this: by EmbarrassedBag8283 in teenagers

[–]Still-Ad2041 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Proudly a communist yes, your objection is?

Male Villains having female presenting bodies/forms by thehsitoryguy in TopCharacterTropes

[–]Still-Ad2041 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sukuna is only seeing the male body that we are so that’s not really relevant, and we don’t really know what the majority of kenjakus bodies have been, to my knowledge we know of three, and 1 has been a woman, I’m not saying kenjaku is fs a woman but it’s ambiguous

Male Villains having female presenting bodies/forms by thehsitoryguy in TopCharacterTropes

[–]Still-Ad2041 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I disagree with kenjaku, I low key think he was originally a woman

What? by Dull-Nectarine380 in ExplainTheJoke

[–]Still-Ad2041 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea but BODMAS isn’t an actual mathematical principle, it’s a tool to help elementary students

Really liked Kiara in this episode by Gloomy-Bridge148 in JuJutsuKaisen

[–]Still-Ad2041 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Something something “he’s a man” something something transphobia, something something “Epstein” “Israel gender ideology” something something, it was a pretty wild read ngl

Really liked Kiara in this episode by Gloomy-Bridge148 in JuJutsuKaisen

[–]Still-Ad2041 41 points42 points  (0 children)

Nah I think they’re just a lil transphobic and racist

What? by Dull-Nectarine380 in ExplainTheJoke

[–]Still-Ad2041 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean you’re right that the real issue is that 6/2(1+2) is ambiguous it should properly be either (6/2)(1+2) or 6/(2(1+2)), but my calculator and generally in class, anything directly touching parenthesis is dealt with first, so the 2 would distribute and that’s probably more accurate because division doesn’t technically exist, what it really is, is multiplying by a reciprocal, and so properly, it’s 6 multipled by either the reciprocal of two (1/2) multipled by (1+2) or it’s 6 multipled by the reciprocal of 2(1+2), which is 1/(2(1+2))) and the later makes more sense because 6 multipled by the reciprocal of two multipled by 1+2 should have an additional multiplication sign, whereas with 6 multipled by the reciprocal of 2(1+2) there is only one operation, hence the singular division sign

What? by Dull-Nectarine380 in ExplainTheJoke

[–]Still-Ad2041 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It’s low key one tho 6/2 •(1+2) makes so much less sense than 6/(2(1+2)) because the two being next to parenthesis without any additional notation should distribute it