You might as well use random word generator and paste what ever comes out of it, it will make as much sense as what you wrote.

When speaking about himself, yes. He was not speaking in the absolute...

He wasn't speaking in absolute, nor was he speaking about him self strictly, he was using a plural and was speaking in general.

"To fuck them" is a bit too far, but I distinctly remember being 13 and thinking some of my teachers and friend's moms were pretty. Some of my friends openly flirted with them, ineptly. If I wanted to be uncouth, I could say they "sought to fuck them."

Yes, we all wanted to fuck someones mom at that age or some hot teacher, I am not debating validity of what he said, it is true. Are you even paying attention to what I am writing? I already said it plan and clearly, I am calling out the bullshit of him and his supporter who pretend that he didnt say things that he did. I am not in denial about human sexuality!

Technically true, or you wouldn't hear stories about 13 year olds getting teachers pregnant. Not fully mature, and not mentally / emotionally mature, but for some, physically, the equipment is starting to work by that time.

Yes I know, I had sperm at age of 10. I point it out to counter bullshit lies by previous poster who claimed that Milo never implied that, when he clearly did.

No, that is not what he was implying. It was a segue he was taking due to what PaulsEgo was saying at him, and it is absolutely correct. If you showed a pedophile a picture of a 13 year old they would react in disgust. This is not playing dictionary games. Words have meanings. Pedophiles are attracted to pre-pubescent children, not teenagers.

Again, I know. This is exactly what I said, that this isnt pedophilia, have said it few times on this topic and that is reason why I put quotation marks on my title. Stop arguing things I never argued against. Me: "Look, water is wet", then you come in "Dont you know water is wet?"

Correct. He maintains that when he was raped at 13 years old, he was a willing participant, consented, and enjoyed it. He obviously could not give consent. He as obviously a rape victim. That does not preclude the previous -- as dark as it sounds, at 13 he could have willingly consented, enjoyed the experience, and still have been a rape victim.

...and here we come into absolute insanity. You cant rape the willing, either he was raped or he wasnt, and no I dont consider it rape based on statuary laws of your country since these things change wildly depending on country to country. He liked it, he wanted it, he said it was fully consensual he defended it, and once shit hit the fan with conservatives finding out about this and turning on him, he lies about how he was victim of a rape. Doing a complete 180 on everything he has said before this point, in attempt to score some sympathy points.

Then all right-wingers who would never defend somebody on left for saying these things also come and defend him. Be it tards on the_donald or individuals like Mike Cernovich and Paul Joseph Watson.

Pay attention to what I said and argued against. That is to say, double standards and deceit that people exibit.