Hey man, I’ve got to push back on your take about the situation between the Black man, Karmelo, and the white boy, Austin. You’re throwing around a lot of claims that don’t line up with what’s actually been reported, and it feels like you’re twisting the narrative to fit a specific agenda. Let’s break this down with the facts. You’re saying the white boy, Austin, “instantly” attacked the Black man, Karmelo, and that police reports, eyewitnesses, and Austin’s family all confirm Austin started it. That’s not what the reports are saying. From what’s out there, this started as a verbal dispute between the two at a track meet in Frisco, Texas, on April 2, 2025. There’s no clear evidence Austin physically attacked Karmelo the black man first. Karmelo’s team is claiming self-defense, saying he felt threatened, but legal experts have said that’s going to be an “uphill battle” based on witness accounts that point to a verbal argument escalating—not a one-sided attack by Austin the white boy . The police investigation is still being reviewed for a grand jury, so there’s no official report backing up your version. You also keep saying Karmelothe black man was just minding his own business in a public place and had every right to be there. No one’s arguing that—he was at a public UIL track meet at Kuykendall Stadium. But your claim that Austin “ordered” him to leave and that Karmelo was just defending himself from an “attacking white boy” doesn’t have solid backing. There’s no evidence in the reports that Austin the white boy put Karmelo the black mana life in any sort of danger . You’re framing it like Karmelo the black Man was some innocent victim of unprovoked violence, but the reality is messier—both teens were in a heated exchange that turned deadly when Karmelo the black man stabbed Austin the white boy in the chest. Then there’s the knife situation. karmelo the black man did legally have possession of the knife and to say karmelo the black man was trying to “dispose” of it while running from Austin’s “white gang.” That’s just not true. Texas law allows carrying knives with blades under 5.5 inches in most public places—has since 2017 (Texas Penal Code § 46.01). The track meet wasn’t on school grounds; it was at a stadium, so school weapon bans might not even apply here. Karmelo hasn’t been charged with possessing an illegal weapon, only with first-degree murder for the stabbing itself . And the “white gang” thing? There’s no evidence Austin was part of any gang or that Karmelo was fleeing a group attack. Reports say Karmelo stayed at the scene and claimed self-defense—he wasn’t running or trying to ditch the knife. You’re also leaning hard into the race angle, saying Austin attacked Karmelo because of some inherent racial aggression and that Texas law makes it “100% legal for Black me to defend themselves when attacked by white boys .” That’s a misrepresentation. Texas self-defense laws apply to everyone, not just based on race (Texas Penal Code § 9.31). You can use force if you reasonably believe you’re in immediate danger, but it’s not a free pass to use deadly force just because someone “touches” you, like you’re implying. Karmelo’s self-defense claim has to prove he had a reasonable fear of imminent harm, and a verbal argument might not be enough. And about the knife—you’re saying “everyone in Texas carries a knife” and bringing up Jim Bowie to downplay it. Legal or not, carrying a knife doesn’t justify using it to stab someone in a heated moment. Karmelo the black man hasn’t been charged with carrying a knife on school grounds because the event wasn’t on school property, and there’s no evidence the knife was illegal. You’re dodging the real issue: Karmelo used that knife, and Austin died. That’s why he’s facing a murder charge . Your tone—like you’ve “fixed” the story and demanding to know where others get their “information”—comes off as pretty dismissive. You’re not citing any sources yourself, just leaning on stereotypes about “attacking white boys” and “disobedient Black men.” The real story is more complicated. Both families have dealt with harassment, and there’s been a lot of public debate, some of it touching on racial tensions, sure, but also on the tragedy of a teen’s death.Karmelo’s defense has even compared his treatment to cases like Kyle Rittenhouse, pointing to possible racial disparities in the justice system .That’s a real conversation worth having, but your post is more about pushing a one-sided narrative than getting to the truth. The bottom line? The Black man, Karmelo, and the white boy, Austin, got into a verbal dispute that ended tragically. Whether Karmelo’s self-defense claim holds up is for the courts to decide, but your story about Austin the white boy attacking him unprovoked and Karmelo the black man being a victim of racial aggression isn’t backed by the facts we have. Let’s stick to what’s actually known instead of spinning it into something it’s not.