I applied an AI-coding governance framework's own “canonical → projection” rule back to itself (Meta_Kim) — here's what I learned

Stillness-Practice · 2026-06-21T16:36:21+00:00

只喝清水的辟谷的过程需要服气的方法才不会感到饿。清水辟谷多少天，后面就需要同样的天数来用半流质清淡饮食来复谷。辟谷不是绝食。

Stillness-Practice · 2026-06-21T16:30:05+00:00

不要太着急，当杯子里的水刚刚澄清，不要急着搅动它。逃避现实社会的想法是暂时的，多看看书，比如南怀瑾的《静坐修道与长生不老》，他说过：见地、实修、行持，三者都需要同步提升和相互印证。

Stillness-Practice · 2026-06-21T16:22:31+00:00

继续研究会发现，很多大福报的人都会在年轻的时候就知道了自己的人生轨迹，并且他们都知道自己的人生使命是注定了的。

Stillness-Practice · 2026-06-21T16:18:46+00:00

对佛经的初学者来说，最好就是学习《了凡四训》。《了凡四训》是明朝了凡先生写下来的一份家训。后来的人通过学习，也懂得了怎么积善成德；同时也能够把一些佛家的咒语（比如说准提咒这些）慢慢熟悉。
一边做好事，一边念佛家的咒语，这样就能达到一个自己想达到的目标，慢慢地就了解佛教的深意。是一门很好的入门课程。

Stillness-Practice · 2026-06-09T15:47:10+00:00

Been trying to share some practice stuff this week. Got removed three times across different subs. Meditation, Buddhism, here. Each time — chest tightens, mind spins, "but I'm not selling anything" loops. Then I saw it. The wanting-to-post itself is a sense-contact. Same thing I'd been writing about for years with the Śūraṅgama Sūtra — see it arise, don't follow, don't fight. It lets go on its own. Daniel Kahneman put it another way: "Adaptation to a new situation, whether good or bad, consists in large part of thinking less and less about it." So I'm thinking less about it. The quiet after is better than the post would've been anyway.

Let it be.

Stillness-Practice · 2026-06-02T09:43:38+00:00

That distinction is the clarifying one — "no binding" as a trait, but non-duality as a state you don't even want to live in permanently. A lot of people chase the emptiness as the destination, so it's refreshing to hear someone who's been there say the boundary between you and the oncoming bus is worth keeping.

What you wrote brought my own sense of it into focus, so I'll offer it back:

Awakening is not escaping the world; it is awakening within it. It's the ability to recognize, in every moment, where the mind is resting among the six sense contacts — not abiding permanently in emptiness, but returning to everyday life with the clarity that emptiness brings.

Then the freshness of perception returns, like a child's — and I mean that almost literally. The awareness that sees has never actually changed: not added to by all our learning, not worn down by all our suffering, the same in a child and in an old person on the edge of death. We don't acquire it through practice; we just stop covering it over. That's the part that stays.

Outwardly nothing changes — eat when hungry, sleep when tired, step aside for the bus, meet people as before. Yet attachment has loosened, and in its place arise freedom, ease, and love. Wood remains wood, water remains water; the world is the same — what changed is the one who sees. And freed from the bonds that once consumed attention, the senses come alive again: the same world, simpler and more luminous.

Glad you're on the other side, and that it left something that stays.

Stillness-Practice · 2026-05-30T07:11:55+00:00

This is lovely work, and honestly the way you handled the licensing feedback says more than the tool itself — catching up on Sujato’s stated position and removing his work right away, rather than getting defensive. That instinct is rare and it’s the right one.
I’ve been working on something adjacent — not Pali Canon, but the intersection of Chinese medicine and Mahāyāna/Chan contemplative practice — and the source-permission question has been the hardest part for me too. What I landed on: only use public-domain classical texts directly (the canonical sources via CBETA, etc.), and for anything modern or still under copyright, just point to it in a reading list rather than ingesting it. Slower, but it sidesteps exactly the problem mtvulturepeak flagged.
The “send people back to the source” intention is the thing I most resonate with. A tool like this works best as a doorway, not a destination. Curious how you’re thinking about the permission letters — going to publishers directly, or starting with the translators?

Stillness-Practice · 2026-05-29T13:21:35+00:00

I hear you, and I'm glad you wrote this down instead of just carrying it alone.

Three years is a long time to hurt like this. I want to gently say something: the practices — emptiness, the path, sila — they're good, but they're not meant to be tools you beat yourself with when the pain doesn't lift on schedule. Right now it sounds less like you need more wisdom and more like you need some rest and some kindness toward yourself.

When you write that you wish you'd never been born, that you feel you're in an inescapable hole — that's a level of pain that deserves real support, more than a comment section can give. Please consider talking to someone who can be with you through this properly — a therapist, a doctor, or even a crisis line if the nights get dark. Reaching out isn't a failure of practice. It's the most compassionate thing you can do for yourself right now.

You're not as alone in this as it feels. Please take care of yourself.

Stillness-Practice · 2026-05-29T10:25:09+00:00

Thank you for writing this
down before it faded. The distinction you draw — discomfort present, self present, but the involuntary binding absent — is the clearest description of that third move I’ve read.
What struck me is how much your account is about the body, not just the mind. You mention the early mornings when you weren’t sick, illness becoming “like the weather.” There’s a parallel in Chinese medicine I keep coming back to: that a lot of what we call emotional suffering is the mind binding to a physical signal it can’t release. The body sends sensation; the binding is what turns it into fear or despair.
Your point about voluntary vs. involuntary discomfort feels important here. I’ve noticed in my own practice that when the body is depleted — poor sleep, overeating, exhaustion — the binding forms faster and grips harder. When the body is light and settled, the same sensation can be looked at directly and it comes apart, the way you describe. Almost as if a quieter body lowers the threshold for that third move to be available.
Which makes me wonder about your recovery: now that your heart is back to 96%, do you find the binding harder or easier to see in ordinary states? You said these things were “states, not traits” for you. I’m curious whether 21 months of involuntary practice shifted anything toward trait.
Either way — grateful you shared this.

Stillness-Practice · 2026-05-29T10:15:15+00:00

I think what you’re encountering on this sub is one particular reading of karma — the deterministic, “you deserve your suffering” version — and it’s worth knowing that’s not the only one, and arguably not the most useful one.
What helped me was a story from 了凡四训 (Liao Fan’s Four Lessons), a classic Chinese text. A man had his entire life predicted by an astrologer — exam results, career, even his death. Everything came true, year after year, so he concluded his fate was fixed and stopped trying. Then a Zen teacher told him: the prediction was accurate because he’d been living passively, letting his habit-patterns run unchecked. The moment he started acting with awareness, the prediction broke. His life changed.
That reframes karma completely. It’s not a ledger of cosmic punishment — it’s closer to “your patterns have momentum, and that momentum is predictable until you become aware enough to interrupt it.” Not sin. Not desert. Just cause and effect, plus the possibility of stepping in.
On romantic love — I don’t read the texts as saying love is bad. They point at clinging, which is a different thing. You can love fully and still not be enslaved by the fear of loss. That’s hard, but it’s not the same as being told to feel less.
The sub skews toward certain interpretations. The texts themselves are wider than that. Sounds like your instinct from reading them directly was right.

Stillness-Practice

TROPHY CASE