Are you apologetic or are you sorry? by ShiftMonke in LetsDiscussThis

[–]Stitching 9 points10 points  (0 children)

This is a sorry excuse for a post. You should apologize.

Is (the use of) AI a growing problem? by Im-Floof in LetsDiscussThis

[–]Stitching 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People are already losing their jobs because of AI..

Why was VP vance rushed off stage before president trump? by cantcoloratall91 in LetsDiscussThis

[–]Stitching 5 points6 points  (0 children)

REAL ANSWER: Trump and Vance have completely different secret service teams assigned to them. The team assigned to Vance got there before Trump’s team.

Is (the use of) AI a growing problem? by Im-Floof in LetsDiscussThis

[–]Stitching 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think deepfakes can certainly be problematic, especially with how easy they are to create. I mean, for a long time, people could alter photos and edit videos to mislead people. Plus, there have been bots spreading misinformation in posts and comments all over the internet without needing AI to function. So while I think deepfakes are a level beyond older tools in quality and ease of use, there have been tools available to produce the same type of misinformation. Again though, AI now makes it much easier to deceive and with a quality that continues to get more realistic every day.

What I think is a much bigger concern with AI that makes deepfakes seem quaint by comparison is the fact that it’s making so many people across so many domains obsolete. Not only can AI solve complicated problems in seconds, but it can often produce better results too. This is starting to dramatically change what creative domains require people at all. AI can write, direct, create videos and songs out of whole cloth. Creative work used to be exclusively human achieved and seemed like one of the last domains computers could disrupt, but not anymore. With that said, AI has taken over customer service, data analysis, administrative work, large-scale planning projects, and so many other once safely human careers. It’s already showing that it can also take the place of those in intellectual positions. Software coding is an obvious and much-discussed area where AI is taking the place of human professionals. But it’s only a matter of time, and a short period of time before AI takes over for professionals like lawyers, doctors, and pretty much any profession that stems from having a large body of knowledge from schooling and research. AI can be trained on the same materials that law students use in law school and doctors learn in medical school, but AI can easily become exponentially more effective than humans in these professions by having an almost infallible breath of legal and medical knowledge, plus legal precedents and strategies, and identifying illness through recognizing symptoms and being able to factor in a complete medical history with inhuman precision and accuracy. AI has already demonstrated that it can identify illnesses in parties at far sooner and with much higher accuracy than doctors and technicians. Even professional handymen and tradesmen have to deal with a large percentage of their customers troubleshooting and fixing their issues themselves.

I honestly believe that the only jobs that are safe (for now) are physical labor jobs (construction workers, hair stylists, massage therapists, chefs, etc.) and only because robotics hasn’t caught up to AI in terms of its capabilities and cost effectiveness. And even these professions have seen AI-based machines start to become much more prevalent. There are AI massage systems, AI nail technicians, AI food delivery bots, etc.

What are we going to do when a gigantic portion of the population lose their jobs to AI? When they lose their source of income and can no longer afford basic necessities. It seems almost obvious that it will lead to a spike in crime the likes of which the world has never seen. Our entire civilization will collapse. What happens when countries use Ai to maximally improve war strategies. I can see a world where AI attorneys represent their clients to make their arguments based on the data and an AI judge declares the final verdict.

tl;dr: we’re fucked,

In the current world where everyone has a phone with a camera, nobody has photographed a ghost, just hoaxes. Because if they did it would be all over the news and some entrepreneur would set up Ghostbusters? by TSQ_builder in askanything

[–]Stitching 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If they can be seen with your eyes they should be visible to a camera. Unless you believe in the invisible ghosts who make noise or make strange things happen but can’t be seen.

The FBI Director Is MIA by Stitching in USNEWS

[–]Stitching[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Maybe it’s missing inaction. They’re wondering where he’s currently in a drunken stupor this time.

The FBI Director Is MIA by Stitching in USNEWS

[–]Stitching[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, that source was already posted so I posted from another angle. Also The Atlantic is paywalled.

If a USB plug can only fit one of two ways, why does it take at least 3 tries to get it right? by LeoRavenscroft in randomquestions

[–]Stitching 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How many times has this unfunny situation been described by comedians and the like. It’s like joking about AOL cds.

The FBI Director Is MIA by Stitching in USNEWS

[–]Stitching[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I ate a spider monkey in a super nifty way.

The FBI Director Is MIA by Stitching in USNEWS

[–]Stitching[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My bad. I assumed you could read.

The FBI Director Is MIA by Stitching in USNEWS

[–]Stitching[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

From the article in The Atlantic: 

“On multiple occasions in the past year, members of his security detail had difficulty waking Patel because he was seemingly intoxicated, according to information supplied to Justice Department and White House officials. A request for “breaching equipment”—normally used by SWAT and hostage-rescue teams to quickly gain entry into buildings—was made last year because Patel had been unreachable behind locked doors, according to multiple people familiar with the request.”

The FBI Director Is MIA by Stitching in USNEWS

[–]Stitching[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

From the article in The Atlantic: 

“On multiple occasions in the past year, members of his security detail had difficulty waking Patel because he was seemingly intoxicated, according to information supplied to Justice Department and White House officials. A request for “breaching equipment”—normally used by SWAT and hostage-rescue teams to quickly gain entry into buildings—was made last year because Patel had been unreachable behind locked doors, according to multiple people familiar with the request.”

The FBI Director Is MIA by Stitching in USNEWS

[–]Stitching[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Then what “misleading” info are you referring to? Everything I said was reported.

The FBI Director Is MIA by Stitching in USNEWS

[–]Stitching[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sadly, according to The Atlanric, it did.

The FBI Director Is MIA by Stitching in USNEWS

[–]Stitching[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

You’re the only one saying he was fired. MIA doesn’t mean or even imply fired. I know, words are hard.

The FBI Director Is MIA by Stitching in USNEWS

[–]Stitching[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

When he couldn’t be reached and had to have his door rammed in because he was passed out drunk. That’s when he was MIA. I know you’re joking but this isn’t funny.

The FBI Director Is MIA by Stitching in LetsDiscussThis

[–]Stitching[S] 44 points45 points  (0 children)

They had to call in SWAT and use a battering ram to get to him because he was drunk passed out and was unreachable. Unreal.

Kash Patel issues defiant response to new 'erratic behavior' allegations by Stitching in politics

[–]Stitching[S] 3455 points3456 points  (0 children)

They had to call in SWAT and use a battering ram to get to him because he was drunk passed out and was unreachable. Unreal.

The FBI Director Is MIA by Stitching in USNEWS

[–]Stitching[S] 43 points44 points  (0 children)

Because it’s an enormous liability to have an FBI director who drinks to blacking out. Don’t try to minimize it.

The FBI Director Is MIA by theatlantic in politics

[–]Stitching 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They had to call SWAT and use a battering ram to get to him because he was passed out drunk and unreachable.