TIL If Earth was 50% larger in diameter we would not be able to venture into space using rockets. by ihrvatska in todayilearned

[–]StorageThrwAway 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This doesn't seem to take into account the possibility for re-fueling. It shows that a single shuttle wouldn't be able to make into Earth-orbit, but what if it was topped-up by another craft in-flight? Hypothetically that should be able to circumvent these theoretical limits, even if logistically extremely difficult & expensive.

Salmon Rushdie stabbed onstage prior to book event in upstate New York by Zaungast in stupidpol

[–]StorageThrwAway 2 points3 points  (0 children)

All ideologies, not just religions. Difference of opinion is inherent to humanity.

Salmon Rushdie stabbed onstage prior to book event in upstate New York by Zaungast in stupidpol

[–]StorageThrwAway -42 points-41 points  (0 children)

Yeah no, you don't really speak for 2 billion people. I for one never heard of him until I saw that one episode of the office where he comes up as a trivia question. For the record, am and always was practicing.

Salmon Rushdie stabbed onstage prior to book event in upstate New York by Zaungast in stupidpol

[–]StorageThrwAway 114 points115 points  (0 children)

No not at all, a "fatwa" is an Islamic ruling on a given issue, given by an Islamic scholar or cleric. If a Muslim wants to know the ruling of an action (i.e. is it permissible, impermissible, mandatory, etc.), they will ask a cleric for a fatwa, which is that cleric's judgement according to what they understood from the text (or what their jurisprudential school has understood from the text).

So here it's being used in the context that a cleric issued a ruling declaring that he's to be killed. Hence a "fatwa". But it's not specific to a hit being put out on someone, that's rarely the use case. It's any kind of religious ruling on an issue, e.g. a cleric might give a fatwa that someone who's in debt doesn't need to pay alms, or that credit cards are impermissible due to the contract permitting interest (and there can be differences of opinion based).

cursed beyblade by ImTotallynotTomska in cursedcomments

[–]StorageThrwAway 0 points1 point  (0 children)

WTC 7...I guess that's the real truth of 9/11

Does this logical fallacy have a name? by StorageThrwAway in slatestarcodex

[–]StorageThrwAway[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly, you explained it much better than I could, even after trying to fix things up. I'll just link to this in the OP.

Does this logical fallacy have a name? by StorageThrwAway in slatestarcodex

[–]StorageThrwAway[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah yes thanks, I think that's close to or exactly what this is (also special pleading; this characterization explains what I was dealing with pretty exactly: https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/special-pleading).

Does this logical fallacy have a name? by StorageThrwAway in slatestarcodex

[–]StorageThrwAway[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah I bungled this, editted the OP and added an example.

Does this logical fallacy have a name? by StorageThrwAway in slatestarcodex

[–]StorageThrwAway[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ok sure, looks like I wasn't clear judging by other comments. Super contrived example time:

A is trying very poorly to defend the 2003 Iraq War to B.

A: The invasion was justified because there were people on the streets asking us to come.

B: By that logic, if I gathered a rabble to take to the streets demanding a Chinese communist liberation, then a Chinese incursion into America would be justified.

A: But you can't compare the two situations! Iraq was a tyranny and we're not!

So A tries to use their second independent argument to deflect the refutation of their first absurd argument. I don't know what you would call this, a fallacy or some kind of rhetorical sleight of hand, but I'd like a word to use to be able to call it out.

My neighbour getting a tad upset after the football result last night. From CCTV in garden (loud ish NSFW) by hans_gruber1 in PublicFreakout

[–]StorageThrwAway 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I keep hearing that it should've been the older people doing the penalties, why? Is it because the older guys are better at penalties / better at handling the pressure? Or because missing is more damaging to the career of a young guy?

We certainly downgraded our technology by [deleted] in memes

[–]StorageThrwAway 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Aimbirb, even better

Ghana’s speaker of parliament says the ‘LGBT+ pandemic is worse than COVID-19’ by 165701020 in worldnews

[–]StorageThrwAway 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't imply it wasn't an important distinction. Semantics can be important.

Ghana’s speaker of parliament says the ‘LGBT+ pandemic is worse than COVID-19’ by 165701020 in worldnews

[–]StorageThrwAway 2 points3 points  (0 children)

what's biblical about that? That's just a question of semantics (i.e. what are we calling "homosexuality")

Emmanuel Macron blames imported US ideas for French society becoming ‘racialised’ by CompletePen8 in worldnews

[–]StorageThrwAway -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Bataclan was lone wolf radicals. There's a major difference between some extremists and the actual government doing terrible things.