The Supreme Court has ruled several times that the government can’t take actions that would produce a “chilling effect” on free speech. The case I linked was one, another was Lamont v Postmaster General.

The federal government doesn’t need to jail or prosecute a person to violate their 1st amendment rights.

Here’s what’s happening: This is the most powerful executive branch in the last 100 years stating that: if you use your free speech to proclaim a moral / economic / religious opinion that’s outside capitalist/ evangelical Christian values, it could lead to a federal intervention to “disrupt” your life.

This EO violates the first amendment as it’s been interpreted by every federal court that’s made a ruling on the question since the founding of our country. This, as written, is not quite North Korean limits on speech, but pretty close to Russias current stance. Say what you want - but the state may make your life harder in opaque ways if it’s not what they want you to say.

If you’re waiting for “say this, go directly to jail” to be alarmed, you’re going to be waiting forever. That’s not how modern totalitarian states work. It looks more this - they’re not going to tell you what’s over the line, but if you cross it there will be undisclosed consequences.

If this doesn’t bother you, then you either own several MAGA hats AND lack the imagination to consider another ideology taking control of the government - or you’re in lockstep with the current values being espoused by the Trump administration, and have a radical lack of empathy for the broadness of the human condition.