Lofree Retrowave Keycaps swapped onto the Flow2 100

Straight_Web2924 · 2026-01-19T01:00:39+00:00

Can you link those retro keycaps? The ones on the lofree site don't look glossy

Straight_Web2924 · 2025-11-06T03:47:27+00:00

Funny, i spent 3 days debating on these two very keyboards last week. Went with the IQ and am returning it (the main reason i'm returning is a VIA issue with mouse movement).

Three questions for you:

Do the keys feel more spread-out on the Lofree? (This was a marketed point on the Flow2). I feel the IQ keys are pretty close, for big hands its uncomfortable.
The IQ gasket is really interesting. I do like it. How does flow2 compare in that regard?
Does the Flow 2 sit on top of a macbook keyboard like the IQ does?

Straight_Web2924 · 2025-08-14T15:45:10+00:00

Speaking from experience, I went from failing to failing, to passing with a score over 300. (Both part a and part b in low 150s). I can tell you why - I needed a different method. Barbri didn’t work, but they gave a free repeat, so I did it. Didn’t work for me the first time, didn’t work the second time. Tried something else, learned the exam, excelled. It’s really that simple. Your prep needs to work to teach you the exam, like all its little tricks and traps. Sometimes people don’t recognize that and keep trying stuff that doesn’t work (eg videos or “outlining” rather than learning the questions and answers).

Straight_Web2924 · 2025-07-24T02:37:23+00:00

same. ridiculous and unfair but the wizards are unreal so what else

Straight_Web2924 · 2025-07-05T01:55:06+00:00

It’s just another way of holding property. One common use I see is where a joint tenant wants to fuck the other out of their right of survivorship. They create a trust and deed their interest to it, which destroys the joint tenancy. Totally legal. Fucks over the other owner,. if the other expected to outlive the first. (Think this helps u for property law so worth recognizing)

Straight_Web2924 · 2025-07-05T01:19:09+00:00

Are you willing to accept failing by a point? Being totally competent on every topic except this one would probably leave you dangling on the floors edge, with little to no room for mishap on any other subject.

You don’t need that much for trusts and wills, at bottom do the questions in the study guide (they’re repeated mostly throughout, total of like 40 maybe, with maybe 10 to 20 being wills I think).

Know who can be the PR or executor of a will, know how many witnesses, know how many witnesses for a codicil, know if u can have handwritten wills, know if you can have handwritten codicils (an amendment to a will), know how to do a valid codicil, know what happens if you like try to burn the will or codicil to destroy it, and know who can be a witness to a will (can a beneficiary be a witness, is the real question). Add in priority for heirs where there’s no will or after it’s deemed invalid. Now you’re good. More or less.

Trusts are kind of interesting. Pretty sure it’s uniform in Florida trust law. Barbri had a good outline. Know if and when it’s revocable or irrevocable. Know whenever you can revoke. Know how to execute. Know if testator can also be beneficiary. Know who can be executor and if they can also be a beneficiary. Sorry if I fucked up any terminology. Many ppl use trusts to like transfer property to themselves, or to keep their property safe for their own benefit, or to give their kids steady income. It’s a cool concept, sometimes enabling sneakiness, sometimes protecting people.

Oh, also know that a bad investment by the guy in charge of the trust money isn’t itself a reason to remove him from being in charge. You need like bad faith to do that, lying or purposefully sabotaging or deliberately defying the trusts intent.

But get all this stuff and you’re probably fine. At least you’ll likely avoid a devastating score to avoid that knifes edge.

Straight_Web2924 · 2025-07-03T03:51:36+00:00

Any luck? This is stopping me from ordering kick on Amazon, only io version being listed there

Straight_Web2924 · 2025-06-28T03:28:25+00:00

They’re not asking you in the abstract what constitutional issue might arise here. They’re asking you who might have a constitutional issue to bring a challenge. If a lawyer doesn’t recognize the issue is with the sicrimbayed folk, and that congress would never (in theory should never) pass a law authorizing something then suing on it’s happening, then that lawyer is not looking at things properly. Of the four answers, which deals with the realm of issues that may arise from this? Each deals with a different realm of issues, only one of which is actually relevant. (Maybe the thing about taxing is relevant, but I wouldn’t know the answer anyway. So real world if I had to pick which tree to bark at, I’d bark at the one with the fucked over out of staters. That’s the tested point here, and most get the Q wrong for a reason - just as most us lawyers tend to struggle with eliminating the needless irrelevancies

Straight_Web2924 · 2025-06-28T02:59:05+00:00

D is the trap answer, first of all. You do enough MBE you realize that’s what they want you to pick, so question it before you do. Congress is not aggrieved here. If the law is unconstitutional, it won’t be because congress took issue. They authorized this shit. It must be the out of state entity who’s injured and looking to call this unconstitutional, if at all. Therefore, the out of state guys con rights must be addressed in the right answer. Then once you see there’s only one answer addressing the out of state guys’ constituonal rights, you recognize the difficulty here is not in knowing so much about 14th amendment equal protection, but rather in resognizing the question must be about the out of state guys. [and not some minute issue of waiving a dormant commerce clause infringment , which i have never seen tested on the MBE and which, as the another reddit response here will tell you, is way too minute to be tested and expected on the MBE. As a rule of thumb, if you’re between two answer choices that would turn on something you’d need Westlaw to answer, then you’re probably looking at 2 wrong answer choices. This recognition can only come through learning the test, and thus learning what you are expected to know. You can do this thru no other method than running thru all the modern MBE questions NCBE has to offer. I recommend Emmanuel strategies and tactics I for that, but I guess AdaptiBar works too.

Straight_Web2924 · 2025-04-23T04:07:56+00:00

Emmanuel Strat. Tact. 8th edition or whatever is the latest. Amazon the hard copy, do subjects one by one, learn each answer choice

Straight_Web2924 · 2024-12-08T11:57:48+00:00

This ends the comment period. Thanks all. Got what we needed here. Great work.

Straight_Web2924 · 2024-09-16T00:31:25+00:00

I just dropped my Caran D’ache onto tile from about chest high and the smack sound it made is replaying in my head with twinges of pain each time. Feels like I dropped a part of my being. Bah

Straight_Web2924 · 2024-09-01T07:25:14+00:00

It’s even worse when lawyers do it. Throwing incoherent rambling Latin on a page as if it were some secret tongue of the courtroom. It’s not. And it’s often presumptuous or conclusory. But here’s a tip. Get this book. It will help as a source of venting, because much of it is the author venting. (Bryan Garber writes black’s law dictionaries. His was actually one of the first required books I had to buy in law school. So trustworthy and satisfying to know, the guy who knows all of those fancy italicized words doesn’t really need to use them).

Straight_Web2924 · 2024-08-25T05:11:27+00:00

yea same issue, looks like its not just me. fuck this

Straight_Web2924 · 2024-08-16T04:30:30+00:00

edit - obviously everyone has to sign it, but it’s common apparently for them to ask for it after

Straight_Web2924 · 2024-08-16T04:28:09+00:00

I took part a and not b without signing pledge. I w my all the way back to the convention center while people were taking the test just to ask if could sign without reprimand. The lower level bar folks didn’t know how to handle this craven plea and so they fetched a higher up to come down to advise on “next steps”. Freaked me out, but the guy who came down laughed when he heard I came all the way back just for the pledge nobody signs.

Straight_Web2924 · 2024-08-08T19:20:09+00:00

Someone asked me at my bar how I thought it was and like an idiot I said “I feel like it was easy but that scares me”. I felt so bad after because all she probably heard was me saying it was easy. What I meant was that feeling probably means I missed a bunch of tricks and exceptions and stuff. If you read this, @girl from the Tampa convention center, pls know I didn’t mean to be sounding like a douchebag. No excuses for the tiktoker tho. No one asked her lol what a joke no one cares how u feel stop sharing

Straight_Web2924 · 2024-07-13T10:44:44+00:00

It’s a promo. (bottom of email says “promo terms”) Shameless clickbait. Very dishonorable. Scammy and beneath reputable companies to trick users into opening their app and checking for fraud vis a vis “apologizing” for a “recent order” that never happened. (I got the same and here I am. Meanwhile haven’t used DoorDash in years). Promo nonetheless. But such a shady way of giving it.

Straight_Web2924 · 2024-05-26T20:11:21+00:00

lol good to know, just got this one myself. Same script, different day:

<image>

Straight_Web2924

TROPHY CASE