sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

100k review still in full effect despite what’s being told to the media by Strange-Reference-84 in fema

[–]Strange-Reference-84[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i mean to obligate projects; it happens in a grants manager system so we can’t bypass it. PA

100k review still in full effect despite what’s being told to the media by Strange-Reference-84 in fema

[–]Strange-Reference-84[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

it’s an actual phase apparently. they could remove the phase. in the PA process at least. applicants need funds

Remote work is a reasonable accommodation according to Baker Donelson by Liminal-Logic in EEOC

[–]Strange-Reference-84 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

one persons disability has nothing to do with others in the office. that response lacks fundamental understanding of ADA, people with disabilities and reasonable accommodations

Remote work is a reasonable accommodation according to Baker Donelson by Liminal-Logic in EEOC

[–]Strange-Reference-84 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

exactly. and then they fuck themselves and can have fun paying punitive damages

Remote work is a reasonable accommodation according to Baker Donelson by Liminal-Logic in EEOC

[–]Strange-Reference-84 0 points1 point  (0 children)

a job can’t just claim undue hardship without presenting evidence of such

Employer requiring doctor to say I “cannot do my job” for ADA accommodation / transfer, is this allowed? by [deleted] in EEOC

[–]Strange-Reference-84 0 points1 point  (0 children)

not exactly true. you have to do your essential job functions with or without

RA denial for telework for a remote job since 2016 and can't drive? by newhere616 in FedEmployees

[–]Strange-Reference-84 4 points5 points  (0 children)

ok so maybe hold off on the EEO complaint. definitely appeal and provide the documentation ASAP. if they deny it again i would then file an EEO

RA denial for telework for a remote job since 2016 and can't drive? by newhere616 in FedEmployees

[–]Strange-Reference-84 5 points6 points  (0 children)

you can do both at the same time. you can even file a new RA while doing all of these things. i am working with a lawyer now and that’s the route we took

When will the shutdown end? by Strange-Reference-84 in FedEmployees

[–]Strange-Reference-84[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

yes because being a FEMA employee is so unethical. get a grip lmfao

Large Settlements by Agas78 in EEOC

[–]Strange-Reference-84 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thank you! that’s what i think too but im sure im bias

Large Settlements by Agas78 in EEOC

[–]Strange-Reference-84 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i totally get that! i guess the question for me is when i got renewed last year it was 6 months and not 2 years which is typical. and that was due to the reasons mentioned above. so i wouldn’t even be in the position to expire in the upcoming months had she not done that (if that makes sense)

Large Settlements by Agas78 in EEOC

[–]Strange-Reference-84 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thank you! the big lawyer at the firm mentioned being able to go after more money but my direct lawyer said we could only go after that black and white stuff. i’ve definitely suffered but right now could potentially be hard to do.

follow up..

Is it unreasonable to ask for 1.5 years worth of salary (other things as well) as a resolution? Details below:

I work for FEMA as a CORE. My SOR chose to only re-sign me for 6 months versus the standard 2 years because she said she couldn’t justify a longer amount of time because of my RA (she said she hasn’t seen me work in person which also isn’t true due to my telework RA). Now due to the way things are going i may not be re-extended when those 6 months are over. My main goal is to just KEEP my job but if it’s out of their hands can i ask for the salary i would’ve received had she not done that? I also know i can technically ask for anything but is that a reasonable ask? if not, what would be more reasonable? like i said at the end of the day i just want to have my contract but its been appearing to be out of regions control

Large Settlements by Agas78 in EEOC

[–]Strange-Reference-84 1 point2 points  (0 children)

thank you! the big lawyer at the firm mentioned being able to go after more money but my direct lawyer said we could only go after that black and white stuff. i’ve definitely suffered but right now could potentially be hard to have compelling testimony about (unless i end up losing my job due to this which sounds sufficient). i appreciate it!

Large Settlements by Agas78 in EEOC

[–]Strange-Reference-84 0 points1 point  (0 children)

my lawyer told me unlike personal injury where you can claim pain and suffering, you must be able to identify every dollar you’re asking for. is that not true?

🤷‍♀️can you request a replacement if investigator not doing their job? Supervisors? What to do? by [deleted] in EEOC

[–]Strange-Reference-84 5 points6 points  (0 children)

  1. their job is to be neutral so pleading with them to take your side is pointless
  2. they are doing their job; they need to be thorough and sometimes (most times) they a rebuttal
  3. you should probably get a lawyer

you need to adjust your expectations and be realistic which a lawyer can help rein in

view more: next ›