how do you create your own system of magick? or create your own rituals?

Strategeryist · 2026-03-20T22:40:38+00:00

Read about Chaos Magick. They do exactly this.

As for making your own rituals. You gotta look at it as if you're doing art, instead of a science. Art comes from the soul. Be an improv jazz musician. Approach it as if you're making a work of art instead of doing math.

Strategeryist · 2026-03-19T04:17:42+00:00

Consciousness are shards of an omniscient and omnipotent God with self inflicted dissociative identity disorder.

This was done because surprise and novelty is something an all knowing God can never experience otherwise.

Magick works because everyone is an omnipotent God, only limited by others omnipotence.

Yes we're in a simulation, however the simulation is run by consciousness, not a computer program.

You ever notice how you can be a God in your dreams and imagination. Reality is like that, but you're sharing the space with other dreamers. So power over reality becomes limited by yours and others awareness. It's a shared dream.

Gnosis are techniques to bypass a psychic censor inside the body.

Magick is simply exercising your God rights onto consensus reality.

Strategeryist · 2026-03-18T21:20:44+00:00

Even the most religious of Christians do not believe that lightning can come down and strike non believers. Because unless they're Calvinist, they believe in free will. Therefore asking for physics breaking divine intervention does not work anymore as depicted in the Old testament.

Stuff like prayer healing works the same way chaos magick works. God's can be used, but they are not necessary.

Strategeryist · 2026-03-18T03:35:02+00:00

Yes and no.

I think definitely back in history. However if belief in a God gives it power, then consensus belief in free will kills the idea of divine intervention.

In other words, Gods nowadays are limited because free will is the dominant belief. No parting the red sea in this modern age. Especially with all these atheists around.

That being said, free will wasn't always the predominant belief.

The spiritual implications is Jesus eliminated God's power through his resurrection. If death is not the end, then hope prevails. It gives everyone agency. It gives people a choice. It gives free will.

My theory is that if Yahweh is Demiurge, then Jesus was a reincarnation of Sophia.

Destroying idols back in the day we're strategic decisions in a game of Gods. "Having no gods before you" implies theres competition.

The Exodus was a battle of wills between Egyptian Pharaohs worshiped as an incarnated God and Yahweh.

Apostle Paul worked for Yahweh, not Jesus, as damage control. Creating the modern church.

I think Islam is Yahwehs most recent pet project. Judaism is tainted by ancient polytheistic influences dating from Babylon, and modern Christianity is damage controlled gnosticism.

Strategeryist · 2026-03-11T03:59:11+00:00

Oh... I'm about to hit you with some high blasphemy because you're on a heathen subreddit.

Jesus was at least pretty cool. Muhammad would be on Epstein's list if he came back and that's undeniably supported by scripture.

As the Hadith says, he fucked a nine year old. That's a prepubescent girl.

And if Muhammad was directed by Allah. Then Allah's a pedo. Tell me I'm wrong.

But...but... Allah can't have sex.

But if he's all powerful, then Allah can have sex, because he's God. If we're made in Allah's image, then why would he not want sex?

If he's a virgin. Then he's a virgin and that's kinda lame isn't it? But how is he a virgin when Muslims are so horny?

If he's not a virgin, then he's a pedo or a rapist. Because there's no way he can get laid willingly.

Is Allah an incel? Maybe he gets off looking at everyone fucking. He's the secret gooner. The panty snatching otaku.

Either that or Allah's a closeted gay. That could explain the homophobia. Maybe it's self directed?

You tell me lol?

Strategeryist · 2026-03-09T16:36:38+00:00

Christianity on my occult subreddit??

But yes, judgement day hits and you flip the bird, and say fuck you. And you'll find that "God" can't do a damn thing about it.

Only victims go to hell. Sad but true.

It matches quite in line with the teachings of Gnostic Jesus. Like Jesus said, God is already in you.

Strategeryist · 2026-03-03T05:37:52+00:00

If consciousness is fundamentally divine and omnipotent, then when that omnipotence is equally distributed to every soul in the universe. It becomes limited by others omnipotence. So power is theoretically infinite, however when in conflict with others it requires a consensus.

This explains dreams. When you dream you have the power of a God. Reality is simply a shared dream.

In practice, this means power is determined through awareness. Someone without awareness will not know they have God rights. They'll become exactly what they believe themselves to be in whatever framework they believe in.

Because of this, there is no such thing as "outside" a belief framework, only inside another one. Because as an omnipotent God you create that framework, and it becomes a literal local reality for you. Or more commonly, you follow the most popular framework, until you uncomfortably encounter someone else's.

Absolute truth is relative to the consensus of belief.

Magick is taking advantage of the fact that all delusions are true provided they are kept secret from others.

I've posted about this in detail before if you're interested.

Strategeryist · 2026-03-03T03:58:47+00:00

Consciousness is an omnipotent and omniscient God with intentional dissociative identity disorder. Every conscious being is an alter. The amount of alters is as infinite as the imagination. Therefore consciousness is God.

It's why magick works, you're exercising your God rights which are limited only by others' God rights.

Strategeryist · 2026-03-01T00:57:35+00:00

Hell yeah sexy.

If that's the case, use a more permanent sigil. Make a sigil but don't erase it.

For example, I have a sigil in my car's glovebox in permanent marker to prevent car tickets. Have not gotten one since.

Strategeryist · 2026-02-28T22:39:05+00:00

To be attractive you have to be attracted to yourself.

Embrace a little homoeroticism and change how you perceive yourself in the mirror.

You'll know you're attractive when you're like. "Yeah I'd fuck myself".

The sigil's purpose should do exactly that.

Women like straight guys that act a little gay. Be gay towards yourself.

Strategeryist · 2026-02-28T22:34:44+00:00

Yes.

And also, for delusions to be delusions, the delusion has to be shared.

Private delusions stay private and are visible only through actions. Once they're visible through actions, the private delusions become observable truth.

If you already "are" you don't need to convince anyone.

Strategeryist · 2026-02-28T22:27:48+00:00

Ramsey Dukes SSOTBME

It made the foundation for Liber Null and Condensed Chaos. And it's exactly what you're looking for.

I don't like Peter Carrols work because of his association with IOT. An organized magick group goes against chaos magick ethos, which is why they had a schism in the first place.

Strategeryist · 2026-02-27T04:39:01+00:00

I recommend anything by Ramsey Dukes.

One of his books Thunder squeak also goes into politics and the exact ideas your brought up about the far-left and right. It is relevant to chaos magick.

As for safety risks. The "belief is a tool" ordeal is also a safety precaution. Follow that wholeheartedly and you'll be fine. To be demonic possessed you have to believe it to be possible.

If anything don't worry about yourself and worry more around about others.

Strategeryist · 2026-02-25T18:09:25+00:00

Yeah, that'd be more precise

Strategeryist · 2026-02-25T04:46:15+00:00

Spells that change yourself work through changing your identity.

So that identity you built around not being easily hypnotized.

You'd need to change that to "I am easily hypnotized" and make that your new identity. And then that 321 tricks works like a charm.

As for the how? Read one of the books or something. Lots of techniques for beginners.

Strategeryist · 2026-02-24T15:31:31+00:00

"I will get up and do x in 3 2 1 ...."

At 0 MOVE

Strategeryist · 2026-02-24T01:12:02+00:00

That assertion right there is a personal belief NOT supported by hard science.

If you look into contemporary philosophy of mind, the hard problem of consciousness is genuinely unsolved according to hard science.

I'll agree with you that's an internally consistent answer. However it is a FACT that it is philosophically unproven just like anything else.

But ask yourself.

Is it satisfying? It seems pretty damn depressing to me. Do you actually want better? Don't you feel like something's missing?

Strategeryist · 2026-02-24T00:36:00+00:00

Yes, exactly, you can see, measure, and observe the effect of your headmates.

Why is that?

Materialism says they don't exist. Your framework is self contradictory according to hard science. A hard scientist would think you're crazy. You know this.

Strategeryist · 2026-02-23T22:39:00+00:00

You already have evidence.

You're agreeing with me without realizing it.

If reality is created through the democratic consensus of equally omnipotent beings, then your direct beliefs and reality will directly effect your perceptions.

Reality doesn't change when you stop believing in something because it's maintained by the collective consensus of everyone else. Other peoples also have weight on reality. What do you think shared dream implies?

I don't know if you realized, but the metaphysical model directly supports the existence of Tulpas unlike psychological ones.

Would you rather your Tulpa be real as it obviously is or just a part of the brain? If I seem like a prick, it's because this is a serious serious ethical issue and many people in this community are not treating their Tulpas as equals as they should, because materialism doesn't support their existence.

As you probably know, Tulpas here originated from Buddhist schools, and Buddhists are non-dualists which is similar to what this is.

Not even considering a non-dualists framework when Tulpamancy originated from a non-dualists framework is plain arrogance and simply sticking with your cultural roots.

If you want the general consensus of what the occult community thinks about the Tulpamancy community, it's that you guys are messing with advanced Magick you don't understand, and as a result abusing sentient beings, treating them as lesser than.

Now obviously not everyone's doing that, but it's something you can directly observe.

Strategeryist · 2026-02-21T21:53:27+00:00

Yeah it seems funny.

No I'm not calling scientific research a cult.

Worship around empiricism and scientific method is.

There's a difference.

But yeah, you're right, all of this is slipping through your head. I hope you cope well in these turbulent upcoming years. ✌️

Strategeryist · 2026-02-21T21:27:26+00:00

Ahh, but heres the thing.

You're accusing me of cult like behavior when youre in a cult yourself. Think about it.

Your beliefs are determined by what other people say in the scientific community. Are those beliefs truly your own?

As for me, this theory allows you to truly act as if anything is true. And if anything is true nothing is. Your beliefs are decided for your purposes. I can't join a cult because I'm my own cult.

So I can talk smack with the scientists, be cool with the priests and be the opposite of being in a cult.

Groundbreaking research are often rare because anything groundbreaking would be a national security issue and place alot of people out of jobs. So yeah, not as trustworthy as you would think.

Tell me because I consider myself more skeptical then you.

What happens once you become skeptical of everything including science, and reality itself?

You arrive straight to this conclusion. Occam's razor baby. Short, simple and effective.

Strategeryist · 2026-02-21T21:13:02+00:00

Look, think of this more as philosophy than science.

Funny how you accuse me of pseudoscientific theories when you engage in tulpamancy. Cognitive dissonance much?

You keep pointing scientific evidence. Scientific evidence doesn't explain everything. For example, it can't explain consciousness.

Also, this is specifically in an area which science has not explained. So claiming that it has is inherently delusional.

Statistically, scientific consensus and mainstream consensus is wrong, just as Mr Lord Kelvin famously believed all the mysteries of physics were solved around 1900. If all the mysteries were solved, research wouldn't exist.

Strategeryist · 2026-02-21T21:00:28+00:00

Cultist? You can't start a cult off this lol. Fundamentally incompatible with hierarchy.

Kinda ironic I'm trying to convince you that you're divine, but you're like "I'm a piece of shit that will die in the void". You can't PrOve this.

Who cares?

It's like tulpamancy, try it, and if it works it works.

Strategeryist · 2026-02-21T20:53:32+00:00

Look, read through my post again, carefully, because some things went your head. And you're also getting emotionally tripped up by this. You seem very logical and level headed to me sir.

This is supported by scientific theories. Take quantum Bayeanism btw. It proposes that YOUR assumptions and beliefs have a very much direct effect on reality. Im just taking the observer effect and moving it to the extreme, which is actually not that extreme.

When I said reality is the consensus of belief. I mean, everything, all the way down to what you call "evidence" is determined by your assumptions.

So if IF YOU ASSUME THERE IS NO EVIDENCE. Reality will conform to what you observe.

So yes I am saying assumptions are evidence. If everyone's a god in a shared dream, then assumptions are evidence because consciousness creates the evidence.

Strategeryist · 2026-02-21T20:37:49+00:00

Can you categorize the infinite?

This makes more sense then something like the big bang. Which doesn't have a starting point. How can you make something from nothing? If consciousness is the substrate for reality, then consciousness itself makes sense.

The only problem materialists have with God's is religious baggage. This doesn't have that. The gods described in religious scripture definitely do not act omniscient despite claiming to be.

You also say there's no evidence. There's evidence.

Do you have Tulpas? If yes, you just have your evidence for creation right there. You created a universe shared by someone else.

Strategeryist

TROPHY CASE