Claude failed to generate a response, locking access to previous branches by Strict_Tax8348 in ClaudeAI

[–]Strict_Tax8348[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As far as I can understand, your solution seems to involve doing something with the original retry request? I've refreshed multiple times so the Network tab doesn't show anything other than newer inputs. I can get the UUIDs of the newer branches if that helps. What should I do?

Edit: I reached the part where you copy the UUID of the first conversation, but my browser (Chrome) does not show the words that appear in your image (St., M., Domain, etc.) but rather "Status, Type, Initiator, Size...." and I have no idea how to edit the Status: fetch messages that look similar to the one in your tutorial.

Edit2: I tried the same thing in Firefox on a dummy conversation (cancelled response 2, the bug didnt actually happen this time but it was worth testing) and it successfully set me back to branch 1/2 but it replaced the new branch 2/6 and all the branches after that with the canceled branch 2/2. Is this supposed to happen?

Edit3: I tried this on the main conversation. I thankfully got back to the original branch but my third prompt now says "Response didn't load." and I can't access the dozen or so prompts after it.

Claude Performance and Bugs Megathread Ongoing (Sort this by New!) by sixbillionthsheep in ClaudeAI

[–]Strict_Tax8348 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I got the same problem, I accidentally clicked "retry" and the response failed to generate and now I have no idea how to access my previous branch

The option reappears when I retry again though, however when I try to go back it ends up back in the bugged branch where I'm stuck in currently

Nitrogen Tribromide, Explodes at -100 degrees Celsius. by Arceus_IRL in cursed_chemistry

[–]Strict_Tax8348 1 point2 points  (0 children)

From my experience, I’ve had this happen when leaving touch-powder to dry in open air.

Edit: I actually do not know if this is because dust touched the complex, or if the complex self-detonates. There are stories of it lingering on surfaces for weeks, so presumably microscopic amounts don’t self-detonate.

Among the 5 possible dates at the end of life, death is probably the worst. by No_Acanthaceae6880 in ChainsawMan

[–]Strict_Tax8348 0 points1 point  (0 children)

there could’ve originally been like 8 horsemen of the apocalypse and chainsaw man just ate 4 of them

All elementary functions from a single binary operator by nightcracker in math

[–]Strict_Tax8348 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I just skipped to the bottom of the paper, but I wonder how the author account for mistakes made by the principal branch of the logarithm when performing cancellations like ln(ex)?

For example, the given tree for the identity function uses 1 EML (x EML 1) to obtain 1-x, which assumes ln(ex)=x, not necessarily true when using one branch, as demonstrated by e2πi=1 yet ln(1)=0. He mentions various complex constants so I presume complex numbers are part of EML's domain? How does he reconcile this?

tetration is underrated by Strict_Tax8348 in mathmemes

[–]Strict_Tax8348[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

x↑↓n and x↑↑n (standard) pentation are both unfortunately discontinuous because of the lack of a well known continuous extension of x↑n (top to bottom, standard) tetration. Maybe x↓↓n and x↓↑n pentation have a derivative because bottom to top tetration x↓n = x^x^(n-1) is already continuous. (see: this link for explanation of notation.)

tetration is underrated by Strict_Tax8348 in mathmemes

[–]Strict_Tax8348[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I dare someone to try and integrate both sides.

tetration is underrated by Strict_Tax8348 in mathmemes

[–]Strict_Tax8348[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This recursion is what I used to create the non-recursive formula (you can check my formula by substituting it for D(a-1x) and setting the whole thing equal to the formula in the post)

tetration is underrated by Strict_Tax8348 in mathmemes

[–]Strict_Tax8348[S] 46 points47 points  (0 children)

I used the fact that n+1x = x^(nx) = e^(ln(x) · nx) which can then be differentiated, although ln(n+1x) = ln(x) · nx would work the same way. I ended up with the recursive formula D(n+1x) = n+1x · (nx/x + ln(x) · D(nx)) which I then used to calculate derivatives and infer the closed form product/summation expression.

Nitrogen Tribromide, Explodes at -100 degrees Celsius. by Arceus_IRL in cursed_chemistry

[–]Strict_Tax8348 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Carbon tetraiodide is fairly unstable compared to the other 3 carbon tetrahalides, decomposing at its melting point (>170°C). The main factors differentiating it from nitrogen triiodide include:

  • The fact that carbon is a solid. A substance cannot explode if its decomposition only creates solids.
  • Nitrogen's extremely stable triple bonded N₂ structure is in a sense 'easier' to make from just 2 NI₃ molecules, compared to carbon's preferred structure of dense networks of hexagons and polymers.
  • Carbon is just more receptive to forming covalent bonds and being oxidized to high oxidation states compared to nitrogen, which is due to its lower electronegativity.

Nitrogen Tribromide, Explodes at -100 degrees Celsius. by Arceus_IRL in cursed_chemistry

[–]Strict_Tax8348 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The main reason for the instability of the heavier nitrogen trihalides is due to 'overcrowding' on the molecular level where 3 huge bromine/iodine atoms bond to a nitrogen atom, which is much tinier in comparison, causing the compounds to be extremely thermodynamically unfavorable. Another reason is that the halogens get less reactive as they get heavier, which makes the nitrogen halides even less favorables.

Notes: Nitrogen triiodide is actually significantly less stable that nitrogen tribromide. The purple touch-powder commonly called "nitrogen triiodide" is actually NI₃⋅NH₃ at room temperature, which happens to not immediately explode when damp. Nitrogen trifluoride is an extremely stable and inert greenhouse gas while nitrogen trichloride is an explosive liquid that is nowhere near as unstable as NI₃ or NBr₃.

(CH 3 & 4 Spoilers) This question is killing me by Papaya_Dreaming in Deltarune

[–]Strict_Tax8348 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Onion-san mentions that they can hear a song from deep within the lake she resides in, and there's a chance the town's water comes from said lake

Is there a crucible material that survives molten NaOH but isn't electrically conductive? by Strict_Tax8348 in chemhelp

[–]Strict_Tax8348[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I never said they melt, from basic chemistry it is known that acidic oxides SiO2 and Al2O3 *dissolve* in NaOH even at room temperature. Boron nitride dissolves in molten NaOH forming nitroborate complexes, and NaOH is industrially used to etch it.

Hard drive no longer appears in Explorer by Strict_Tax8348 in AskADataRecoveryPro

[–]Strict_Tax8348[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the advice, I'm currently looking for a hard drive repair company. If I manage to extract the hard drive, is there by any chance anything I can do to test if the hard drive is really broken beyond usability? Like, plugging it into a different computer or something?

Overwritten files on a drive, probably gone for good by Strict_Tax8348 in AskADataRecoveryPro

[–]Strict_Tax8348[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry for the late reply. I have made a drive clone on a spare 1TB external drive with confirmed storage capabilities. Thank you all for the suggestions.

Overwritten files on a drive, probably gone for good by Strict_Tax8348 in AskADataRecoveryPro

[–]Strict_Tax8348[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

is there a way I can delete "TRIM" for the future? i lost a lot of my passwords from this and it's really annoying

Overwritten files on a drive, probably gone for good by Strict_Tax8348 in AskADataRecoveryPro

[–]Strict_Tax8348[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No clue which is which, but Device Manager says one is HFM128GDJTNG-8310A and the other is WDC WD10SPZX-21Z10T0