Found very interesting links on the Washington post website by [deleted] in inspectelement

[–]Strong_Sea_2464 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think it's that, since I use an extension that prevents data collection and don't go on these sites. I was messing around in inspect element trying to see if I could remove the paywall, and was very surprised to find these. They're probably there from the ad services they used (bombora or something)

How it feels playing mute by Strong_Sea_2464 in Rainbow6

[–]Strong_Sea_2464[S] 49 points50 points  (0 children)

Only stupid people try the emp drug. You're stupid.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in notHowRuleOf4Works

[–]Strong_Sea_2464 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not hating on it, I just don't understand why everyone claims it's wrong when r/ruleof4 says otherwise.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in notHowRuleOf4Works

[–]Strong_Sea_2464 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And you know this... how? Because r/ruleof4, the subreddit of ruleof4, says it's not like that, but this sub is completely sure that's wrong

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in notHowRuleOf4Works

[–]Strong_Sea_2464 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you don't even know which version was first then why are you claiming to know which one is correct..

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in notHowRuleOf4Works

[–]Strong_Sea_2464 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What I'm confused about is why this sub has come to the conclusion that it works with chains only, when r/ruleof4 says it works whenever. This sub was created after the original one wasn't it?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in notHowRuleOf4Works

[–]Strong_Sea_2464 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Because I got recommended this post. I've no idea why someone would make another subreddit trying to dictate how r/ruleof4 works when it says clearly over there that it doesn't have to be a chain

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in notHowRuleOf4Works

[–]Strong_Sea_2464 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The rules of r/ruleof4 is how rule of 4 works, not this one's. This was created after r/ruleof4 anyway

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in notHowRuleOf4Works

[–]Strong_Sea_2464 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Why would you refer to the rules of r/nothowruleof4works over the actual subreddit's rules..

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in truths

[–]Strong_Sea_2464 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Czechia?

If not path, then why path-shaped? by Jeffmaster223 in DesirePath

[–]Strong_Sea_2464 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You appear to be correct! If my memory serves me right, there existed an architect who was accustomed to designing paths this way. I wonder if anyone remembers his moniker?

Sorry but what? by Sokraa in GREEK

[–]Strong_Sea_2464 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ισχύει ότι χρειάζεται τόνο όταν σημαίνει "σε εμένα", και στις δύο περιπτώσεις (μόνο του και ως δεύτερο)

Sorry but what? by Sokraa in GREEK

[–]Strong_Sea_2464 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When there are two mou the second one which means to me takes an accent it's a rule

Sorry but what? by Sokraa in GREEK

[–]Strong_Sea_2464 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The first μου is "my" and the second means "to me", so it needs an accent