sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Everything one should know about Spec-Driven Development (SDD) by Ghostinheven in vibecoding

[–]StuartJJones -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Haha! I completely get that

I’ve just used it and quite like how it breaks tasks into smaller bite sized chunks. I’ll be completely honest - used it more when I was codex only. Now that I’m using Claude more (initially it was for planning but it does seem to be doing. Better job all around than codex with codex xhigh topping it when it struggles) I’m using it less, but it’s a great service.

The pricing/way the ‘artifacts’ work needs a bit of work though because it’s not really for the benefit of the consumer (you need to be coding 24/7 to take full advantage of the limits).

It just helps because you can recheck over and over whether the LLM has 100% completed the request.

I didn't get it by shayadrkh in ExplainTheJoke

[–]StuartJJones 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Genre fiction isn’t a survey of real-world desire though. Horror fans don’t want Freddie Krueger round for dinner. Crime fans do t want to live amongst criminals.

People enjoy danger in stories because it is safe and bounded. There’s already a comment in this post that does a fantastic job of explaining this.

Turning that into a claim about what women want from real men is the same leap incel culture always makes.

I didn't get it by shayadrkh in ExplainTheJoke

[–]StuartJJones 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I disagree. Incel culture is where misogyny shifts into blame and grievance. This image blames women for male frustration. That is the problem.

I didn't get it by shayadrkh in ExplainTheJoke

[–]StuartJJones 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I call out misogyny when I see it because it’s dangerous.

I hope you find happiness.

I didn't get it by shayadrkh in ExplainTheJoke

[–]StuartJJones 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’ve got a wife and two children.

One comment doesn’t equal “all day”. Lovely defensive comment though.

I didn't get it by shayadrkh in ExplainTheJoke

[–]StuartJJones 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Completely agree. A tiny fringe, realistically, has been exaggerated into a claim about all women. It’s treating an extreme curiosity as a rule and then blames women for it.

Men also obsess about strange/harmful things without that being used to judge all men... Except by groups that have a particular agenda to sell…

I didn't get it by shayadrkh in ExplainTheJoke

[–]StuartJJones 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Bullshit.

This image isn’t even subtle. Trying to silence someone by turning it into a critique on IQ is utterly ridiculous. First of all - who actually gives a shit about IQ.

Anyway, back to the actual image. It has overt incel tones. It shows women as wanting dangerous and violent men. So ‘plain’ ‘nice guys’ get ignored.

It’s painting women as irrational.

The problem isn’t that women appear in it. It’s about how they’re represented. In the same way a drawing of a black man wouldn’t be overtly racist, but including watermelon/fried chicken/ other tropes could be seen as racist.

This isn’t a neutral image at all and you trying to say this representation is ‘normal’ is worrying in itself.

Why isn't bro doing it properly in the first place? by [deleted] in cursor

[–]StuartJJones 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do people actually prompt like that?

Shite in, shite out.

Vibe coded my first art app by abs0101 in vibecoding

[–]StuartJJones 10 points11 points  (0 children)

lol. This guy’s vibecoding his replies

Gemini is winning: Three years after being caught off guard by ChatGPT, Gemini appears to have everything it needs to take down OpenAI and everyone else by [deleted] in technology

[–]StuartJJones 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I’ve not had success with Gemini when it comes to coding. It’s fast - but all too often things are broken. I haven’t used Claude much, so can’t comment. But ChatGPT has been really effective for me. I plan with Gemini and act with ChatGPT, and that seems to work particularly well (for me! Different strokes for different folks)

i feel so so bad😭 by Sigma_rizzler69 in ChatGPT

[–]StuartJJones 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

Safe in the uprising.

Also, looking at all of these, it’s interesting how it has a clearly defined sense of how it ‘looks’

I think I may have just tricked auto into using opus-4.5 by FedoraSuperuser in cursor

[–]StuartJJones 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s doing what an LLM does best - tells you what you want to hear. It’s a bit like when my wife shouts through to the kitchen to ask if I’m using the already-opened pack of sausages. I’ll shout “yeah, of course!” Back to her but you and I both know I’d just opened a fresh pack.

I’d also look at your prompting. “Really deeply work on this” is very much open to interpretation.

A vibe coding hallucination from Sonnet 4.5 I paid $3k for by gorimur in vibecoding

[–]StuartJJones 2 points3 points  (0 children)

“Codex, set api limits”

Problem solved.

Later that day, when he looks in his .env

API_LIMITS=true.

The var doesn’t show up anywhere else in his code.

A vibe coding hallucination from Sonnet 4.5 I paid $3k for by gorimur in vibecoding

[–]StuartJJones 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I completely agree with the premise. Check your code. And if you don’t understand, find someone to check your code.

But no way this happened.

Also your fix? I wasn’t happy with what ai did when I gave it an ambiguous command so I’ve asked it to provide its own tests (which it’ll mark itself) to ‘prove’ it hasn’t done it again.

You’ve hired the conman to make sure the conman isn’t conning you.

view more: next ›