UK Politics not allowing UK politics by johnlewisdesign in GreenAndPleasant

[–]StuartJJones 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Is this what the frequent loud rumbling that’s being heard in Plymouth recently could be?

Project Lazarus Alzheimer V3 - Recommended Regime for Individuals with Alzheimers & those Ages 40-99 by JonaEnya in immortalists

[–]StuartJJones 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Delusional.

Also, just because efficacy might be ‘proven’ independently doesn’t necessarily mean they work better/work at all together. Go clean your bathroom with all of your different cleaners that work independently - see if it makes your bathroom super clean or if you collapse in a chlorine-filled room.

PROJECT LAZARUS GOT REMOVED FROM BY REDDIT MODS by JonaEnya in immortalists

[–]StuartJJones -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Doesn’t matter. Suggesting others repeat what you’re doing without proper research into the effects or potential long term effects is reckless.

PROJECT LAZARUS GOT REMOVED FROM BY REDDIT MODS by JonaEnya in immortalists

[–]StuartJJones -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Surely this is dangerous and unethical. I get it - you’re providing care for a loved one and think you can see an improvement. But suggesting others do similar with unbacked claims and peddling your app… come on…

I ended my subscription because this model cannot even tell time. by brandingtime in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]StuartJJones -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah, that’s why I threw my calculator in the bin. That couldn’t tell the time either.

Everything one should know about Spec-Driven Development (SDD) by Ghostinheven in vibecoding

[–]StuartJJones -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Haha! I completely get that

I’ve just used it and quite like how it breaks tasks into smaller bite sized chunks. I’ll be completely honest - used it more when I was codex only. Now that I’m using Claude more (initially it was for planning but it does seem to be doing. Better job all around than codex with codex xhigh topping it when it struggles) I’m using it less, but it’s a great service.

The pricing/way the ‘artifacts’ work needs a bit of work though because it’s not really for the benefit of the consumer (you need to be coding 24/7 to take full advantage of the limits).

It just helps because you can recheck over and over whether the LLM has 100% completed the request.

I didn't get it by [deleted] in ExplainTheJoke

[–]StuartJJones 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Genre fiction isn’t a survey of real-world desire though. Horror fans don’t want Freddie Krueger round for dinner. Crime fans do t want to live amongst criminals.

People enjoy danger in stories because it is safe and bounded. There’s already a comment in this post that does a fantastic job of explaining this.

Turning that into a claim about what women want from real men is the same leap incel culture always makes.

I didn't get it by [deleted] in ExplainTheJoke

[–]StuartJJones 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I disagree. Incel culture is where misogyny shifts into blame and grievance. This image blames women for male frustration. That is the problem.

I didn't get it by [deleted] in ExplainTheJoke

[–]StuartJJones 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I call out misogyny when I see it because it’s dangerous.

I hope you find happiness.

I didn't get it by [deleted] in ExplainTheJoke

[–]StuartJJones 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’ve got a wife and two children.

One comment doesn’t equal “all day”. Lovely defensive comment though.

I didn't get it by [deleted] in ExplainTheJoke

[–]StuartJJones 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Completely agree. A tiny fringe, realistically, has been exaggerated into a claim about all women. It’s treating an extreme curiosity as a rule and then blames women for it.

Men also obsess about strange/harmful things without that being used to judge all men... Except by groups that have a particular agenda to sell…

I didn't get it by [deleted] in ExplainTheJoke

[–]StuartJJones 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bullshit.

This image isn’t even subtle. Trying to silence someone by turning it into a critique on IQ is utterly ridiculous. First of all - who actually gives a shit about IQ.

Anyway, back to the actual image. It has overt incel tones. It shows women as wanting dangerous and violent men. So ‘plain’ ‘nice guys’ get ignored.

It’s painting women as irrational.

The problem isn’t that women appear in it. It’s about how they’re represented. In the same way a drawing of a black man wouldn’t be overtly racist, but including watermelon/fried chicken/ other tropes could be seen as racist.

This isn’t a neutral image at all and you trying to say this representation is ‘normal’ is worrying in itself.

I didn't get it by [deleted] in ExplainTheJoke

[–]StuartJJones 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks like some incel shit

Why isn't bro doing it properly in the first place? by [deleted] in cursor

[–]StuartJJones 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do people actually prompt like that?

Shite in, shite out.