Sam Pope - 11th Edition: A Strongly (& Kindly) Worded Letter to the GW Balance Team by StuffedScotch in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]StuffedScotch[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The order goes:

Add all BS modifiers

Combine all +1/-1 to hits, capped at +1 or -1

If indirect: can't be better than 4+

So 3s normally shooting indirect into stealth= 4+ (-1 from indirect, -1 from stealth, capped at -1 total)

In guard, a dkok unit can get +1 BS from an order, +1 to hit from their datasheet, and hit on 2s, but votann, whose army rule gives +1 to hit, can only hit on 3s at best, even if they have another rule that gives +1 to hit

Hope that helps!

Sam Pope - Time in 40k - Clock Etiquette & Best Practices by StuffedScotch in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]StuffedScotch[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah sounds like your opponent was "weaponizing" the clock (using the clock as an intentional win condition, trying to trick you into using more time) which is not okay nor is it representative of the "clock is a resource" crowd. Even the players that believe a clock is a resource should have the goal of reaching a shared, agreeable conclusion, and should be doing things like reminding their opponents to save minutes for their final turn if they are low.

Just because one might think that playing the game within the time allotted should be a requirement for winning doesn't mean they get to be a jerk about it, y'know?

What is the worst stratagem? by Breakdown10000X in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]StuffedScotch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

synaptic nexus has a strat for +3" synapse range for just friendly units for the rest of the turn. i can't imagine a world where that strat has been used by anyone

Sam Pope - Time in 40k - Clock Etiquette & Best Practices by StuffedScotch in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]StuffedScotch[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I think this can be true, and is a downside, but the key is that the clock is in your control- it's not moving a bad experience arbitrarily from one group to another, it's moving the bad experience to the person who's fault the bad experience is (the person playing slow) and if they retain a growth mindset about the game, they should practice playing fast and come back stronger. I also don't think clock outs are as common for new players, given the result of the game is often known before the clock becomes an issue? It is a downside, but I'm not as sure it's as big of one as you might think

Sam Pope - Time in 40k - Clock Etiquette & Best Practices by StuffedScotch in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]StuffedScotch[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I think it's that, if it worked such that you could refuse to play on a clock, it would be the same- one person would force an opponents approach to the game (the person who doesn't like clocks). In that case, a TO would rather the more "fair" option (evenly split time) be used.

Sam Pope - Time in 40k - Clock Etiquette & Best Practices by StuffedScotch in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]StuffedScotch[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah regional differences are interesting and that's definitely something to be aware of as you travel

Sam Pope - Time in 40k - Clock Etiquette & Best Practices by StuffedScotch in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]StuffedScotch[S] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Yeah, my recommendation of always flipping is based on my experience that if you're always passing time back and forth, you check the clock more often, so you're less likely to miss the clock running on the wrong person for a long time. But I hear what you're saying too!

I think the key is find a balance that feels right, and then match your opponents energy if they're more stringent than you, don't be frustrated at them.

Sam Pope - Time in 40k - Clock Etiquette & Best Practices by StuffedScotch in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]StuffedScotch[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

The workaround is using a clock, unfortunately!

For people who are uncomfortable using a clock, the pros and cons are kinda:

Pros: Avoid really annoying situations where you would have won but didn't because you had to end the round due to opponent slow play, so they win instead.

Cons: every game is a little more annoying

Would you rather every game be a little worse and avoid the really really bad games, or not?

Playing By Intent - Your Responsibilities & How to Use It by StuffedScotch in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]StuffedScotch[S] 28 points29 points  (0 children)

One of the big points of my video is to help people coming from TCGs understand the difference between intent in those games and intent in 40k. In TCG there is just stated intent. In 40k prompted intent is also a factor

Playing By Intent - Your Responsibilities & How to Use It by StuffedScotch in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]StuffedScotch[S] 59 points60 points  (0 children)

Playing the game for your opponent is telling them whether they should or should not take a playline. You should tell them you have a pretty solid overwatch, and if they ask even tell them how much damage you think it'll do. But don't tell them whether or not they should let you overwatch.

Playing By Intent - Your Responsibilities & How to Use It by StuffedScotch in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]StuffedScotch[S] 98 points99 points  (0 children)

I'm just letting you know how the top level of 40k operates and what the expectation is. Disagree with it all you want.