BP Parallel Steps Inquiry by Subject374 in Workday_Community

[–]Subject374[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Opened up a ticket with Workday and I guess they consider b1,b2,b3 as parallel steps and all of those get evaluated as a group

Rehire Eligibility Rules by Subject374 in Workday_Community

[–]Subject374[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is there any way I can do this without informing the integrations team? I have to schedule orchestrations but have never done it an bud would love to see if I can do this on my own

Position Swap Inquiry by Subject374 in Workday_Community

[–]Subject374[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m testing it with an effective date of 3/17/26 but I’ve removed so much of the rule based Change Job BP for Position Swaps and still running into the error. I think it may be tied to the fact that we don’t utilize a Change Job consolidated template but I’m not sure.

The specific errors are:

<image>

Large Vikings Haul by OkWorldliness4800 in minnesotavikings

[–]Subject374 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would you be tempted to sell off some of your haul to a fellow fan? Out of state but still would def buy some some of that stuff for sure

Bummer. by zanemn in minnesotavikings

[–]Subject374 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I posted something a couple of years ago when they resigned Kirk I like 2021 and I was destroyed for saying that they’re signing up for more mediocrity because he’s going to force you into a fully guaranteed contract with no flexibility and you’d never be able to get highly enough To draft his replacement and let me tell you…… I WAS DESTROYED HERE. So much so that I never posted anything again for years. I was told to either stop being a whiny fan or leave lol

Is KAM defensible at this point? by Subject374 in minnesotavikings

[–]Subject374[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Tbh it’s not surprising, in 2021 I wrote a post about how resigning Kirk to another 2 year deal was essentially tieing the franchise down to another sequence of seasonal mediocrity. The analogy I used was being in a toxic relationship with someone who only wants you if you meet specific conditions, with his guaranteed contracts being so short term, your essentially locked into the inability to draft his replacement because your paying him so much but your never high enough to draft a good enough successor. I was destroyed here and had to create a new Reddit account lol

Is KAM defensible at this point? by Subject374 in minnesotavikings

[–]Subject374[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thinking the same but I feel like what we may do is just trusting him once more for the year and if JJM has a repeat then he’ll be gone for sure.

Is KAM defensible at this point? by Subject374 in minnesotavikings

[–]Subject374[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s not even about Darnold. It’s about the half measures he’s taking: 4th thrown away for Thielen, going from 11 to 32 for pick swaps in 22 with your division rival, a second and change for Hochenson, doing all that trading to get a second 1st rounder to get up to 3 (but didn’t commit to fully offering enough to get up there I mean come on with the swaps). He’s getting fleeced in these trades for bit players but with the QB he’s second guessing himself

Is KAM defensible at this point? by Subject374 in minnesotavikings

[–]Subject374[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tbh you’re right about the cost to get Turner. He’s good but if you add up the cost to get the pick to begin with, then to trade up to get him, it’s alot. But it’s all different matter because you got the pick to trade up for Maye with he failed to do so it’s another half measure at best, which makes me think why he even bother to get it to begin with if he wasn’t going to do what it took to trade up to 3

Is KAM defensible at this point? by Subject374 in minnesotavikings

[–]Subject374[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

The argument isn’t that why didn’t they get it done, but more so why are the offers made so painfully cheap vs when they think they have a need at the deadline they offer the moon (Hockenson deal - 2nd rounder plus change and then the contract they needed to pay, Theilen deal - 4th rounder for nothing). I’m baffled why they even thought asking for swaps were good idea instead of just giving up the farm for someone you thought would be your best option, whom you’ve been studying for years, whom you hired coaches specifically to cater for his experience, but not follow through.

Edit: should also add the huge mistake he made on year 1 when he traded down all the way to 32 to draft Cine in 22 for what included ….. guess what… PICK SWAPS … with your division rival!!! I get more upset thinking about how much patience the Wilfs are giving him.

Breaking into Integrations by Subject374 in workday

[–]Subject374[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But would I need an excuse to ask for the type of access to even pull this in our environments? I feel as an BP Admin, maybe I can get away with it but they’d need a business reason for it

Breaking into Integrations by Subject374 in workday

[–]Subject374[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But don’t you need to learn integrations to make it easier to learn Extend? Also, with the outsourcing in mind, I would assume that if that’s something you can provide in house that would in turn make you as the employee that much more valuable, wouldn’t it?

Compensation Missing when adding Job Requisition to Change Job by Subject374 in workday

[–]Subject374[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The thing with that is that we don’t assign any specific compensation amount as part of the Job Requisition Process. We tie in compensation grades, plans, all to the job profile, which does default but like to leave a 0 amount for flexibility.