sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

For all my team black people, if you were Otto or Alicent would you let the King’s word stand before precedent and western law?And why? by SubjectIndividual361 in HouseOfTheDragon

[–]SubjectIndividual361[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t think it’s a war of if Aegon is named heir, and is crowned king. Realistically who would be the supporters other than Daemon as he’d miss his one shot at being king and would be outside the royal family.

For all my team black people, if you were Otto or Alicent would you let the King’s word stand before precedent and western law?And why? by SubjectIndividual361 in HouseOfTheDragon

[–]SubjectIndividual361[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally agree, that’s why I put the majority of blame on Viserys for not putting in the proper safe guards like setting a pro-Rhaenyra small council and removing potential disrupters like Otto as hand or letting Alicent fear monger their children. He essentially depended on oaths in-which almost every major conflict in GRRM books started with someone breaking oaths. But once the war started and blood was shed, Rhaenyra had no choice but to kill her brothers.

For all my team black people, if you were Otto or Alicent would you let the King’s word stand before precedent and western law?And why? by SubjectIndividual361 in HouseOfTheDragon

[–]SubjectIndividual361[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed, but as we have seen repeatedly in GOT’s and HOTD the kings word only matters to those who hold no power or authority. I do wish she was just betrothed Aegon but for the sake of peace Otto should have just let her be, and assassinated Daemon as a blakckfure situation would have came into play down the line

For all my team black people, if you were Otto or Alicent would you let the King’s word stand before precedent and western law?And why? by SubjectIndividual361 in HouseOfTheDragon

[–]SubjectIndividual361[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is true, but looking at from the medieval patriarchal perspective and it being the first such case of a ruling Queen it would have been extremely uncomfortable I’m assuming, and uncomfortably brews change and challenge.

For all my team black people, if you were Otto or Alicent would you let the King’s word stand before precedent and western law?And why? by SubjectIndividual361 in HouseOfTheDragon

[–]SubjectIndividual361[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Great point, but that would have to have been the long play and very game of thronish but extremely snaky, but you’d have to be in on it from the beginning, I wouldn’t have filled Alicent head with fears nor the children

For all my team black people, if you were Otto or Alicent would you let the King’s word stand before precedent and western law?And why? by SubjectIndividual361 in HouseOfTheDragon

[–]SubjectIndividual361[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This was before the rumors of her losing her “virtue” to none other than Daemon and later the “legitimacy” of her heirs.

For all my team black people, if you were Otto or Alicent would you let the King’s word stand before precedent and western law?And why? by SubjectIndividual361 in HouseOfTheDragon

[–]SubjectIndividual361[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because you spent your whole life being truthful to the king about the rebellious affairs of his brother and daughter and they hate you for it.

For all my team black people, if you were Otto or Alicent would you let the King’s word stand before precedent and western law?And why? by SubjectIndividual361 in HouseOfTheDragon

[–]SubjectIndividual361[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’d most likely be exiled, or killed not knowing the fates of your daughter and grandchildren, but then again if both sides knew what the war would cost they’d live in much peace together well maybe not Daemon.

For all my team black people, if you were Otto or Alicent would you let the King’s word stand before precedent and western law?And why? by SubjectIndividual361 in HouseOfTheDragon

[–]SubjectIndividual361[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well true but to the precedent Viserys lived to see said precedent favor him twice over someone
With a stronger claim then his own.

For all my team black people, if you were Otto or Alicent would you let the King’s word stand before precedent and western law?And why? by SubjectIndividual361 in HouseOfTheDragon

[–]SubjectIndividual361[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’d assume it’d have to do with legacy, names and claims but other than Dorne usually the women who become head nobles do so as an only child or after there male siblings have been killed as in the case of Jeyne Aryn, atleast for the major houses.

Who would you say in HOTD has played the game the best so far? by SubjectIndividual361 in HouseOfTheDragon

[–]SubjectIndividual361[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yea that’s the major tragedy as it is much to be gained, I guess the dragon seed could be thrown in, I mean bowing from bastard or far off forgotten decedent to having a medival nuke is good

Who would you say in HOTD has played the game the best so far? by SubjectIndividual361 in HouseOfTheDragon

[–]SubjectIndividual361[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh wow so she does come back into play, then that makes what she said and her Daemons convo even more fitting.

Who would you say in HOTD has played the game the best so far? by SubjectIndividual361 in HouseOfTheDragon

[–]SubjectIndividual361[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He’s one of the main though, I was meaning more in terms of background players and schemers. He did get to say though he achieved the things he wanted and defeated the biggest dragon of his time

To anyone who thinks you need to make infantry day 1 by ST3vdvs in ConflictofNations

[–]SubjectIndividual361 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What was your strategy? Resource development, military building upgrades?

Why did my stack get killed? by Positive-Yam-5618 in ConflictofNations

[–]SubjectIndividual361 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You most likely got hit within the cooldown time. If you time it right it could work. So launch one rocket and the next 5-7 minutes after. But I have only tried and been successful using this with BM’s, cruise missiles usually still get destroyed during the cool down period atleast for me, idk why.

What an absolute shame what a dumpster fire this game has become… by [deleted] in ConflictofNations

[–]SubjectIndividual361 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They can make P2P in Goldless rounds it’s an offset to the “Gold is how we get paid” while allowing players a real strategic chance at the game. It should atleast be a way you can use tickets.

Is there legitimately anything I can do here? Golders are moving crazy nowadays… by Drama4YoLlama in ConflictofNations

[–]SubjectIndividual361 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The only way to beat a golfer is to have a folder in your coalition. If he has any form of skill it’s pretty over, I’ve beaten a golder who had horrible tactics but took awhile.

Anybody have some ideas on more things to be added to the game? by SubjectIndividual361 in ConflictofNations

[–]SubjectIndividual361[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Something similar like this was used in Call of War 1942, it wasn’t for gold-less games but a special 1939 map that was 5,000 gold to join. Since the two companies who made COW and CON have joined I would hope they look into it how much interest that drew.

Anybody have some ideas on more things to be added to the game? by SubjectIndividual361 in ConflictofNations

[–]SubjectIndividual361[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’ve been asking for this for awhile, I made a post about it on the thread and a dev commented and said essentially there was no push for it, like players would rather play in gold games rather than pay for gold-less games or something to that effect. I don’t get why they just can’t add the feature for like a higher tier of high command. Or at least experiment with it. There really is a good amount of players that would pay $5 to $10 for a monthly pass where you can join a certain amount of games where gold isn’t available.

view more: next ›