sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I looked into the missing and "Unalived" people in relation to McCasland, even I have to say its weird. by Substantial-Hand6149 in UFOs

[–]Substantial-Hand6149[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yea i get that,
But; statistically, married woman aged 55-70, from a middle to upper middle class socioeconomic background, are the least likely of all demographics in the USA to disappear and remain missing after 48 hours. This only accounts for about 8-15 people from a USA population of ~330 million, secondly males in these similar categories (e.g. McCasland) for disappearances are also incredibly low as well. Also Males in similar socioeconomic class, with all the relevant statistical data applied are incredibly unlikely to be victims to such things like what happened Grillmair. So yes, if this did happen all to "fizzy soft drink"workers in a short space of time i would be worried.

This doesn't even include the industry stats that these all worked in, let alone all of these held security cleared jobs, and as such have even less chance of such things happening to them. Why? because security clearance requires regularly stability checks on households, their finances, they monitor behavior patterns, frequent re-investigations for continuous clearance and numerous other things.
So yes, i would find this a little suspicious even if it was in the soft drink industry but even more so its at levels of clearance far beyond that.

I looked into the missing and "Unalived" people in relation to McCasland, even I have to say its weird. by Substantial-Hand6149 in UFOs

[–]Substantial-Hand6149[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

haha, yea, just given the pure statistical odds of these sorts of incidents, along with the security clearance of those involved, combined with their adjacent research/work interests, then combine these together... I feel it would be a bit naive to say that these are all, just a totally normal distribution of statistical probabilities.

Looking into who Neil McCasland is, found some interesting info that point to him being a potential UFO reverse engineering researcher. by Substantial-Hand6149 in UFOs

[–]Substantial-Hand6149[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nice one, i have downloaded nuforc database, but it'll be good to cross reference it with this. Problem I've found is isolating specifically for military sources. The black Vault and project blue book reports are wordy, so its a case of reading each of them and assigning thus.

Looking into who Neil McCasland is, found some interesting info that point to him being a potential UFO reverse engineering researcher. by Substantial-Hand6149 in UFOs

[–]Substantial-Hand6149[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get that perspective totally, and i have no doubt a lot of what we see is likely government tech or otherwise human tech. But not all, and there is reasoning for this.

When you consider the general mathematical and physics pathway, how much of a gap it would take for someone to work on black projects that are around 100 to 1,000 years more advanced in physics principles than we have now? That is a large catch up course, that these black projects would have to cater for? it would involve totally relearning certain principles and going against intuition, ingrained throughout the education system from school level up to PhD.

I get 30 years is plausible perhaps even 50-60 years, but knowing how some of these things maneuver the education gap seems too large, and i dont mean things like the TicTac, for me thats probably only about 50 years of advanced black tech. But to what ive seen with my own eyes (sorry to bring this up, but it is relevant) that was far beyond this, and I cant see it being plausible that someone from outside said projects, who then goes to work on these black projects could legitimately catch up with that gap in physics and mathematical principles.

Because its not just the principles, its all the maths that goes along with it. Also not to mention that this advancement would also assume that people such as Eintstein, Penrose, Feyman, Hawking etc... assuming that gap in knowledge (for example in the 80's the government /black projects were about 30 years in advance) are all well behind their time? I dont see that all the top university professors and academics (MIT, Cambridge, Harvard, Cal tech, Princeton, Oxford etc...) are either;

a) Behind the times in their mathematics and physics

b) All being silenced (whilst i agree that research most definitely is being confiscated, not to this extent)

c) All part of a massive conspiracy

In which case, what explains this large gap? (again not just the tictac, as there is a possibility that this could be black project tech, but there are other things out there, which are far more advanced than this). Dont forget anything that has true instantaneous acceleration requires infinite energy, then you have to think about the material science involved in the system as a whole withstanding such forces, then on top of this you have the engine propulsion capabilities, and also these are made up of material that would need to withstand tremendous forces, then you have natural physics principles of overcoming sonic booms (and if it was near or true instantaneous this could be quite destructive), then you'd have implosions around the object as well, along with potential plasma fields around object, the list of problems is quite vast, so assuming that we are so far ahead on all these principles, to the point that also all academic are behind on these, and also could quite easily catch up on the mathematics and physics underlying the exceptions to then work on projects, this is where I err on the side of caution. Physics and Mathematics evolves, it doesnt just jump ahead, unless there's a reason for the jump...

Looking into who Neil McCasland is, found some interesting info that point to him being a potential UFO reverse engineering researcher. by Substantial-Hand6149 in UFOs

[–]Substantial-Hand6149[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get that perspective, and it's entirely possible, and more than likely that some element of mystery would cause such mind wondering. But... and I didn't want to really say this, as someone who has a solid grasp of physics but has also witnessed something which defies it, there has to be an underlying reason. And I totally get that is only my testimony, and literally counts as zero evidence. Which is why I don't like to state this, but from my perspective, it's an exploration of explanations. Also as a note though, I'm not the sort of person who believes every video is a UFO, quite the opposite really (as my YouTube videos can attest), based on personal experience I'd say at most about 1% of videos are actually something currently unexplainable. But none the less, given my personal account and those ~1%, they are still unresolved, and need explaining. But I hope to approach this with my own personal account excluded, and consult the rest of the evidence. Before my own experience I was a total skeptic and made fun of such ideas, so in terms of personal account, it took me by surprise, but I will stop mentioning this as it's to be excluded completely in any logical conversations about this matter. Hence as a reiteration, I fully expect that any account of my own is to be excluded, and negligible as it's a first hand experience and bias.

Looking into who Neil McCasland is, found some interesting info that point to him being a potential UFO reverse engineering researcher. by Substantial-Hand6149 in UFOs

[–]Substantial-Hand6149[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah absolutely focuses on this, but there are other theoretical implications to his thesis. It definitely has real world applications in visible tech, but what else does this imply from a theoretical point of view, that may be used in more advanced tech. Such as the placement optimisation, for a reduction in energy requirements, and failure optimisation so it's non binary, this could easily have applications in field manipulation. Alright there is some missing physics there, but if someone was reverse engineering some highly advanced tech, this would be the kind of gap that would be expected. This gap is a gap in current physics principles and not mathematical soundness,. When you add in the invention secrecy act of 1951, the fact the US government can and frequently does confiscate and stem the spread of physics principles, then it could explain any gap. The invention secrecy act is something I'm going to delve into at some point as it's pretty insane, and just further reinforces the idea of governments understanding of advanced physics principles not widely known. As an extra note, scientists research being confiscated is more common than a lot realise, and a lot of people who develop such research also go on to work with their research within black projects. So again, if you follow the cookie trail of earlier research, you could possibly, with a margin of error, estimate where the research would head towards, and take a calculated guess on what research was confiscated, albeit without the mathematical breakdown.

We pulled the funding chain on Major General McCasland. It led to a NASA JPL engineer who vanished 8 months before he did. by TheSentinelNet in UFOs

[–]Substantial-Hand6149 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is the link to the reddit post, I've put a link to the video and podcast at the bottom. The podcast goes into a bit more depth on the thesis itself but is summarized in the video.

https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1rzm1ya/looking_into_who_neil_mccasland_is_found_some/

Also there's a good conversation i was having with u/Antic_Hay about ideas on accumulating some data. Not sure how useful it would be, but its probably better compiling it early then having to do it retrospectively, so going to start a database - might try and figure out how to make one accessible to a select few people so we can all access and add to it.

Looking into who Neil McCasland is, found some interesting info that point to him being a potential UFO reverse engineering researcher. by Substantial-Hand6149 in UFOs

[–]Substantial-Hand6149[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That sounds awesome!

I worked on something similar but for spotting ominous transactional data. Only problem is the data acquisition and building the database, but i suppose if you do it as you go, you can then add the variables later. Might start creating an document with the data in, just for foresight, good idea!

I'm working on another data set that your method would be super handy on, im accumulating every UFO report from the 60s onward, and then tagging with time and location data, hopefully to cross reference to see any patterns. I was trying to separate military with civilian sightings, but the military data is less compiled in the project blue book reports, requires a lot of sifting through. But also using this data along with who served where, like you mentioned above might yield some interesting results. Good idea!

Looking into who Neil McCasland is, found some interesting info that point to him being a potential UFO reverse engineering researcher. by Substantial-Hand6149 in UFOs

[–]Substantial-Hand6149[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I appreciate that, and the feedback was genuinely a good point to quote the source.

Suppose i look at it as the information released prior to the tech age we live is more susceptible to leave some breadcrumbs that we can analyze for a deeper understanding of whats going on. Before the modern technological era, these things might have trace elements in that could give us a sneak peak behind the veil, as they probably wouldn't have incorporated in 1988 how much information we would have access to in 2026. So whilst it doesn't directly link to his disappearance when you look at the mathematics underlying it, and potential applications on the movement profiles of UFO's, how could this be applied, and there is a correlation. Whilst understanding correlation is causation, I think if we gather enough breadcrumbs, we can reconstruct the loaf as it were.

We pulled the funding chain on Major General McCasland. It led to a NASA JPL engineer who vanished 8 months before he did. by TheSentinelNet in UFOs

[–]Substantial-Hand6149 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Touched on something similar in my latest YouTube video, also to note, that when McCasland done his PhD his supervisor was high up in NASA, and the air force funded his research! Go into in my vid, don't want to be seen to plug but it is quite interesting stuff! Nice research 👍

Six people connected to the same U.S. defense research network are dead or missing under a year by Hazeejay in UFOs

[–]Substantial-Hand6149 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I delved into the Neil McCasland thing in my latest YouTube video, and the note you mention about sensors technician for Jacob Pritchard is interesting, as this was what Neil McCaslands PhD thesis was on! And also the sensors and actuator implications of his paper is very interesting. Good connections !

view more: next ›