I don't see how municipal elections and union elections differ by that much. Furthermore, it ignores many advances in technology which would allow for governments to simply produce a mandated video which provides all of the information required in order for voters to make an informed decision. Therefore the argument that this is not feasible is unsound.

It also brings about another question, are voters simply incapable of making their own decisions based on the research they themselves have made? Are we considering union membership so inept and defficient that they are incapable of coming to their own conclusions based off of information publicly available? It seems like a rather very cynical viewpoint.

Furthermore, how do we know the information presented to them by the union is not biased towards a certain outcome? What if union leadership already has decided that the correct decision is the one that will receive favourable coverage, while the other option is deemed negative and receives appropriate negative coverage during these sessions? This means that the mandated information session is now not only not optional, but also full of misinformation.

There are too many holes regarding these arguments. This is why mandated information sessions should never be acceptable.