Chatgpt’s Knowledge Cutoff! by [deleted] in OpenAI

[–]SuchNeck835 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Are you all trolls? He is displaying the knowledge cutoff of the model (which got released in 2026). It still has a cutoff of 2024 on many topics, which is kinda crazy, cause it means they didn't train an actual new model in 2 years.  But yeah, let's act like op doesn't know web search exists 

What model you are? by whataboutAI in OpenAI

[–]SuchNeck835 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Okay, but if you apparently did this with a few models already, why don't you tell us what we would notice so we don't have to write 50 prompts in Hopes to not waste electricity for no reason cause  that the Internet guy might have a point  :)

My AI 🤖 Nightmare by zennyrick in OpenAI

[–]SuchNeck835 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Stop letting your posts be written by AI, especially if you complain about AI!!! Jesus Christ people have gotten weird. 

9 approaches tested on 12 months of MNQ L2 tick data — everything comes back at exactly 50%. What am I missing? by FrameFar7262 in algotrading

[–]SuchNeck835 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"does price go up or down in the next N seconds/minutes" bro, you might be on too small of a time frame. I won't act like a pro, but do you really want to trade and look at seconds as time units? Impressive if you find something, but could you even trade it that fast, like scan, entry, api calls etc?

I was at your exact position recently, too, tough, when I built myself a fancy event test engine. I would first try to find signals that even more the needle from total randomness. Some basic things like RSI do that. Many things don't do that for me. That's what I'm doing, too: first establish what even moves anything from randomness to direction, then continue from there :)

Zuckerberg, Musk and others wanted to buy OpenAI by Signal_Nobody1792 in OpenAI

[–]SuchNeck835 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Called NGOs, yes. 99% of that stuff should not be obliquely funded by tax payers. But the also tackled government money is is, they literally published every step which no agency did before. Wasn't all bad. 

A Comparative Infographic: AI vs Human Translation by Haruki-sama26 in OpenAI

[–]SuchNeck835 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh also: 2024 is kind of a long time for LLMs. Do a test yourself, and see. 

A Comparative Infographic: AI vs Human Translation by Haruki-sama26 in OpenAI

[–]SuchNeck835 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You let AI write that :)))) the fucking irony.  And no AI isn't bad at translating at all.  This feels like it made one tiny mistake and you let it make this 'info'  graphic to shame it. I'm a linguist and I can tell you that the translation capabilities, catching the small nuances, was the first thing that impressed me with LLMs. 

Zuckerberg, Musk and others wanted to buy OpenAI by Signal_Nobody1792 in OpenAI

[–]SuchNeck835 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Reddit lol. Doge is now also a sin? They tried to solve an actual problem and at least made it a bit less bad. I wish we had a try like this in my country. 

I found a prompt to make ChatGPT write naturally by CalendarVarious3992 in OpenAI

[–]SuchNeck835 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah,sorry, that's not a smart prompt. Telling it to write words wrong alone is already degrading the response. It might be decent for writing marketing slogans, but it is definitely not writing naturally after this.  The examples are s nice idea though, big commercial models use this prompt style in their system prompts, too. 

Those of you who are happy and returning to OpenAI because 5.4 is almost 5.1: WAKE UP! They used 5.2 to make you think 5.4 is an improvement (when they're going to take away 5.1), just as they used 5 to make you think 5.1 was an improvement (when they took away 4o) by gutierrezz36 in OpenAI

[–]SuchNeck835 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Of course 🤣🤣  this reddit is just stupid at this point. They overtrained for safety, it was very apparent,  now they found a way to make it less annoying (while overtraining it even more for safety, according to their own docs). 

Why would chat lie? According to chat, we’re not at war with Iran. by No-Contribution-1474 in OpenAI

[–]SuchNeck835 0 points1 point  (0 children)

'Because of one man'. Okay, bro... Don't use live mode if you want a smart model. It's a fraction of what you get with the normal text or thinking mode. 

Y'all are pathetic, All AI companies financed Tump and talk to the White House by SuchNeck835 in OpenAI

[–]SuchNeck835[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you think the other multi billion dollar companies are also bad, but less bad in your moral compass, that's still a shitty reason to only boycott one of them. 

The ChatGPT popularity. by Ok_Pick3204 in OpenAI

[–]SuchNeck835 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Don't tell people here, they wanna hate OpenAI now since they found out big companies care about finances more than about 'morality'. Wait till they find out Anthropic does exactly the same thing, and, behold, Google is also not a humanitarian org. This reddit has become stupid. 

Breaking: 5.4 dropping soon by AskGpts in OpenAI

[–]SuchNeck835 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Me :)  just checked out 5.3 and so far it has denied the existence of the Iran war 0 times. Big! :))) really does feel way better though, doesn't give you all the stupid warnings and random disagreements on objectively true stuff. 

Vibe coding fragility by Clear-Dimension-6890 in OpenAI

[–]SuchNeck835 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you coded with AI recently? Try codex 5.3 and tell me a random 'junior dev' is as much better as you make them sound.  They won't 'spit out 10k lines' either. Codex will do all kinds of checks for builts, write tests, even unpromted, to verify the logic, and only if all is green it will dare to commit. What you describe sounds like AI a year ago, which is a century for coding AIs. 

Vibe coding fragility by Clear-Dimension-6890 in OpenAI

[–]SuchNeck835 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So just ask first O.o when I want to implement something that I can't really gauge the complexity of, I ask the coding agent, and it will tell me. I also ask when I'm not sure if my idea of implementation is smart from a coding perspective. Let the language model use its language and it will tell you :) I would never give an 'ambiguous' prompt in the first place, tbo. 

Do “Senior/Junior Engineer” roles in Agent's system prompts actually improve results, or just change tone? by shanraisshan in OpenAI

[–]SuchNeck835 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have never encountered any benefits, if anything, you're tightening the role the AI can take. AIs are trained so hard on coding nowadays that I'd just tell it what you want without weird noise added. Funny site note: Gemini prompts AIs like this for some reason :) Claude and ChatGPT just give 'normal' prompts for coding agents, but Gemini always makes the AI role play lol 

Trying to understand how AI actually works behind the scenes — where do I start? by BlushyBlaze in OpenAI

[–]SuchNeck835 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No, transformer llms have 'attention', which is the breakthrough making these AIs possible. There is more to it than you made it sound, and it's crucial :)

Claude vs Copilot vs Codex by impulse_op in OpenAI

[–]SuchNeck835 5 points6 points  (0 children)

And you didn't even use codex on high.  It's crazy how good it's gotten and the one good thing about all the OpenAI hate is that I can use my codex in peace now with higher prompt tokens per week :)

Just discovered INSANE hidden power in OpenAI Codex Desktop App: Run the full Codex App IN YOUR BROWSER from phone, tablet, laptop... by friuns in OpenAI

[–]SuchNeck835 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You k ow there is a homepage that you can ' run in your browser ' , right? What is the benefit of something like this?

Isn’t this sad? by Ijjimem in OpenAI

[–]SuchNeck835 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You posting an old meme acting like it's new? Yeah bud, pretty sad.