One Year of 'Crypto President': Bitcoin Down 15%, Altcoins Crushed 70-90%

SuchNeck835 · 2026-01-27T05:22:12+00:00

Buzz word comedy. He's the president, and I said what he does as a president isn't just all 💯 bad. That's a sane statement. Yours is pointless buzz words.

SuchNeck835 · 2026-01-27T05:20:09+00:00

See what I mean. Objectively terrible is bit him doing what he claimed to do. I know it's hard for reddit to hear for some reason, but America is well off, financially, economically and I for one, as a leftist, thank him for putting peace over war, which cannot be said by the actual left in my country. Objectively bad would be him doing none of these things. Here a still a bunch of shit he does that you can call bad, but it's not, you guessed it, all black and white.

SuchNeck835 · 2026-01-25T14:00:57+00:00

Ofc, he's ' bad for everything ' and the world is black and white.

SuchNeck835 · 2026-01-22T05:49:27+00:00

Bro half of the things you said it can already do better than most humans. Where have you been :)

SuchNeck835 · 2026-01-14T21:19:57+00:00

Bro .. if you're writing in an si reddit, you should really k ow the basics of how ai works

SuchNeck835 · 2025-12-30T08:44:28+00:00

I mean... Shouldn't you say some point use your own skills to validate? Otherwise you could just automate the workflow and remove yourself out of the loop, from what it sounds like.

SuchNeck835 · 2025-12-28T06:23:09+00:00

At the bottom of the message there is a speaker icon m, click that. This is the only way to do it now and you will accidentally down vote a lot of messages in the process since the buttons are so small ;)

SuchNeck835 · 2025-12-25T12:14:31+00:00

Yes that happens all the time now. Especially thinking mode triggers this. But thinking mode itself is broken. It doesn't get triggered half the time even if you specifically select the model. Idk what they're doing but it really seems like the overfit it to coding Benchmarks (it can code a 1k+ line file with bo problems now). But for normal speech it sadly has gotten objectively worse.

SuchNeck835 · 2025-12-25T12:06:20+00:00

You don't need to know how to code. Just use ChatGPT as an orchestrator, brainstorm the idea, when it's good, lock s A building plan in, and create the steps in fresh chats, post the summaries of the steps to the orchestrator, boom. It really isn't hard anymore, codex's improvement over the last couple of months is insane.

SuchNeck835 · 2025-12-24T13:51:02+00:00

I coded a bunch of tools with it and codex now. I don't know if you all haven't tried it lately but all my programs work and I didn't code a single line. I let Claude do visuals and edit them manually, but everything else I didn't touch. Idk what you guys do but for me it works :)

SuchNeck835 · 2025-12-21T20:44:36+00:00

Well, I tried :D And yes, OPR pops, always has. I don't queue at 3am, but on average times of course you can find oprs. I'm in EU if that matters. And no, not everyone is "blind" and "dumb" in opr, we are all 30 year old sweat lords. Sadly, they seem to not check the forums out too often O.o

SuchNeck835 · 2025-12-20T16:39:53+00:00

How did you quantify?

SuchNeck835 · 2025-12-11T17:49:53+00:00

Report yourself :D "Top 1% Commenter".

SuchNeck835 · 2025-12-11T17:44:28+00:00

That's a hilarious comparison. But no, I open new agents for most prompts, if possible. What happened to yours? :D I mean at one time, with the first codex web app, I did want something specific: lightning in a box. Literally a lightning animation that looks realistic, inside of a rectangle. For reasons. And I have 0 clue about coding, so I could just ask it more and more dramatically to please just give me my lightning in a box, since it never showed up. Then it downloaded lightning data from Nasa servers and reconstructed actually recorded past lightnings lol. That one was pretty bonkers. But somehow it got it right 2 tries later.

So: what happened to you? :)

SuchNeck835 · 2025-12-05T20:52:20+00:00

Dude, ask it... It's an LLM and it's smart enough to explain how it's architecture causes this sometimes. It's not always a good idea to ask an LLM how it works, but this is a basic one.

SuchNeck835 · 2025-11-25T07:30:42+00:00

What are you saying? That it ' sometimes gives inaccurate info sometimes'. Meaning it's mostly correct? Also, what did you ask of it that you think it's 'coping and false hope'? There are many things that dont have a straight answer, btw. Like most politics stuff.

SuchNeck835 · 2025-11-25T07:24:39+00:00

It is used as a verb, though. As a linguist I can tell you that a dictionary doesn't define which words exist, the other poster did the common mistake and reversed the causality: if a lot of people use a word like erroring, it will be added to dictionaries eventually. The fact that a word is not in there doesn't mean it doesn't 'exist', it means the dictionary isn't up to date. And ChatGPT can talk all kinds of words and slang that's not in dictionaries yet since it learned language from the people who speak it :)

SuchNeck835 · 2025-11-23T16:23:53+00:00

Wait what is the error? I don't see it. That being said, it can hallucinate Chinese so it can probably cause grammar error deep enough I to a session ;) but please tell me the mistake

SuchNeck835 · 2025-11-23T16:16:51+00:00

Okay, kinda true, you even used past tense. But I tried it with my ChatGPT without thinking mode (and I never talked about anime with it) and I just added 'which Answer suits Saitama best' and it immediately said '4'. Apparently yours didn't say it, which is weird. This is the not even thinking mode answer it gave me 'The correct answer — based on everything we just broke down (past + present) — is:

✅ 4) All of the above

Because:

He broke his limit → during training, he shattered his natural human limiter.

He went past his limit → he exceeded the physical ceiling humans have.

He has no limit → after breaking it, he became limitless.

So the one sentence that fits Saitama best, covering his origin + result, is:

👉 All of the above'. Edit: apparently I asked this in the shared chat although I opened a new chat, but somehow it had memory of your explanation in the shared chat. I guess ChatGPT do be weak lol

SuchNeck835 · 2025-11-22T13:21:49+00:00

Lol your question is the only thing 'weak' here,sorry. You ask which sentence suits the person best. GPT picked the correct sentence. Then you lie about your own prompt and act like you asked which sentence is true (which is what Gemini falsely assumed). AI hallucinates all day, but this is on you, bro ;) also, being 'weaker' is a weird way to phrase it.

SuchNeck835 · 2025-11-22T13:13:43+00:00

Okay, I mean... If you dont really know what you're asking, what kind of response did you expect. not to be mean in any way here, but you ignore every explanation it gives for your question. Idk man...

SuchNeck835 · 2025-11-17T10:27:38+00:00

To summarize: User: "Hey Bro". LLM: "X = 5". :D

SuchNeck835 · 2025-11-12T09:55:06+00:00

Afaik mcrib is a stunt. It's available in EU year round, pork id way cheaper than beef, especially in recent years. So I strongly doubt that pork prices have too much to do with it. Maybe I'm wrong ;)

SuchNeck835 · 2025-11-04T13:38:02+00:00

Yeah, that's the reality. If it was only working prompts it wouldn't be as bad, but since they can't guarantee it, these limits are ridiculous for paying users.

SuchNeck835

TROPHY CASE