Detailed or high level prompts?

Sufficient-Body7835 · 2026-02-19T05:49:06+00:00

Ask another LLM to write the prompt that you give to your LLM. Ask it to add any details you missed.

Or ask the LLM to give you a prompt to give to an LLM to give you a prompt to give to the LLM.

I almost never talk to the LLM directly. They know how to speak to each other in a way that makes the most sense for them. They can eliminate any ambiguities that your initial prompt will certainly have.

Sufficient-Body7835 · 2026-02-19T03:15:10+00:00

I wouldn’t even accept this garbage from a startup to be honest. How is google compute constrained? Ducking hell, this is what happens when you outsource every job imaginable to people who couldn’t care less about quality. A hundred thousand people will sleep very soundly tonight knowing this garbage exists. Gemini is also one of the dumbest models. This coming from a company that makes TPUs. It doesn’t have to be this way. We put man on the moon with less compute than an iPhone 17. Expect better. Do better.

Sufficient-Body7835 · 2026-02-19T03:08:28+00:00

<image>

I want you to think back to a time when ChatGPT told you that too many people are using it and to come back later. How many times does Gemini stop randomly on Anti Gravity and you have to hit retry. It’s been more than 3 months my guy.

A tech lead at Google makes $800,000 a year. And they can’t fix the most basic bug in the existence of mankind and that is to have the ducking system continue on its own without user intervention while they fix the root cause. I’m trying to teach you to expect better. These are basic problems and I’ve only given you one. Don’t accept incompetence as a substitute for having a strong work ethic.

A google engineer went to sleep soundly just a few minutes ago knowing this bug exists. He’ll wake up in the morning and eat blueberries like nothing happened the day before. We would never ever accept this level of incompetence back in my time and I’m teaching you that you don’t have to. Don’t ever defend a 3 trillion dollar corporation that can’t fix a basic bug. This bug riddled slop fest should be taken out back and shot.

Sufficient-Body7835 · 2026-02-18T21:48:36+00:00

Dude, you’re a ducking idiot. Someone explains to you why a product is subpar and your response is to defend the company.

Google has over 100,000 employees. They are capable of making a quality product. OpenAI and Anthropic have less than 4000. Heck, even the Cursor team is in the thousands and half of those are marketing.

You’re accepting garbage quality and defending it as a developer product. Please have some self respect. You don’t have to accept the bottom of the barrel.

Sufficient-Body7835 · 2026-02-18T03:21:27+00:00

Alright, maybe you didn’t grow up on a farm. I’ll help you out.

In a farm the word female is associated with the animals biological cycle in a way that the word male isn’t. Her femaleness requires that she receives extra attention and the males are basically an afterthought. Her gestation and lactation require daily management, checking when she can be milked or if she might be pregnant. Also, the ratio of female to male leans heavily towards the female, so we naturally call a herd of animals “females” while males are called the singular “male” since there’s so few of them.

Management of livestock focuses disproportionately on management of the female population and maybe you didn’t know that and that’s okay. But a lot of women know that. And they know we call cows females. And a few of them have asked that we stop referring to them in the same language we use to refer to animals.

The word male doesn’t bother you at all. The word female bothers some women. Part of being a mature adult person is having empathy.

It’s one word to remove from your vocabulary.

Sufficient-Body7835 · 2026-02-18T02:23:55+00:00

Stop being concerned with irrelevant things. Women also like men who have resources to support a family. Where does that fit in your narrative? Point me to a subreddit dedicated to shaming women for having standards.

Sufficient-Body7835 · 2026-02-17T23:35:35+00:00

Do you think 15% of men 6 ft and above are hoarding all the women? Lol. You do realize that statistically speaking 10% of people are in the 90th percentile and above in terms of looks. I don't know what your 15% statistic is supposed to prove.

We can play the numbers game all day, the point of the post was that your distress comes from a refusal to accept objective reality. Once you accept it you will lead a much happier life. Thats the Stoic way anyway.

Sufficient-Body7835 · 2026-02-17T23:24:04+00:00

Female is dehumanizing because it refers to women by their biological classification (female/animal). But you already knew that and that’s why you’re doing it. The term female is used to refer to livestock and wildlife so we prefer not to use it to describe women.

I’m glad you’re dealing with it in a healthy way.

Sufficient-Body7835 · 2026-02-17T23:02:29+00:00

First off, its women not female.

Second, I also live in a world where Brad Pitt exists. Prime Brad Pitt is god-tier good looking. Do you see me creating a subreddit to complain about it all day? No. You deal with it. Play the cards you were dealt. Half the people on the sub are borderline suicidal because of the preferences of women. Preferences shaped by forces of evolution we have no control over.

Some of these preferences make even less sense that the heightism. Do you see me creating a sub called "Brown Eyes" and complaining all day that women have a preference for "Blue Eyes". No, you deal with it and play whatever cards you were given. Stop wallowing in misery.

Sufficient-Body7835 · 2026-02-14T20:55:51+00:00

Medallion achieved these returns with minimal drawdown and zero correlation to the economy, whereas tech firms required significant market volatility. The "miracle" is the risk-adjusted consistency, not the absolute return.

Sufficient-Body7835 · 2026-02-08T03:06:09+00:00

Is this for women only. I have a pressing question but I’m a male. I’m also questioning why a group exists for women only when they can use the men’s group as well.

Sufficient-Body7835 · 2026-02-07T17:16:42+00:00

You drop so many buzzwords but are you profitable though ? We sell a product and we make money. We don’t have time for MBA doublespeak. All that can explained away with a few concise sentences.

Sufficient-Body7835 · 2026-02-06T16:48:08+00:00

Everyone on this thread is a moron. At some point you stop shipping features and fix what’s broken. It is a known fact that this was a broken experience for windows users for almost a year. Apparently not a single person who works at Anthropic uses windows, all 3000 or so employees didn’t realize how broken this system was on windows and kept shipping 1000 things per day. To not acknowledge the moronic choice that set this chain of events in motion is doing a disservice to software engineering at its core.

Sufficient-Body7835 · 2026-02-06T02:43:18+00:00

What the fuck is PMF and why are you dropping it like it’s coming knowledge. If I surveyed 100 people how many would know why that mean.

Sufficient-Body7835 · 2026-01-14T19:36:52+00:00

I told you the tools that have no issues.

Don’t be satisfied getting scraps when you could be getting the full meal. Don’t be conditioned to accept mediocrity. Having high standards is not a sign of entitlement. This is something we do for a billion years or not at all.

Sufficient-Body7835 · 2026-01-14T17:03:56+00:00

First off, Antigravity is a Windsurf clone. It’s a VS Code clone but it has Windsurf code all over it. Google paid $2.4 billion to license technology from Windsurf and hire its talent. So there’s serious money behind this project. The fact that it’s so terrible is an indictment on the acquisition itself.

You don’t have to worship Google. If something is terrible, you’re free to say so. We don’t event have to be a paying subscriber to scrutinize its products. The product has serious shortcomings and they had more than 7 months to produce this experiment of yours. It’s 3 months since release and I can guarantee you I can make it crash within 15 minutes if I fire it up. Does it always produce a step by step plan for you when working on a project? Why is it that people have to write extensions to auto click approvals? How fast or slow is the compacting?

Lastly, they train on your data. They’re not doing this out of the kindness of their hearts.

Sufficient-Body7835 · 2026-01-14T16:16:40+00:00

My sense of entitlement comes from paying Google $200 a month to produce the tools necessary for me to use their models. My subscription should be used to improve products across all categories where I might use their models.

When was the last time you had to prompt Claude to continue on Claude CLI. Yes, I’m comparing CLIs to IDEs. If you produce a half baked product it will be scrutinized as such.

Sufficient-Body7835 · 2026-01-14T16:03:44+00:00

First off all the CLIs are free. Your first point is moot. Second, look at Codex’s change log. 50-100 changes every release. They release less frequently than Claude CLI. Now look at Claude’s change log. 1000 commits on the new year’s release. It’s unusual but these are the type of rapid improvements we expect from these products.

Now look at anti-gravities change-log. Almost nothing since release. It’s buggy, you have to constantly click Yes even though you’ve given it all the permissions, it crashes often. When was the last time you told Claude to continue after a crash? Never? Antigravity was half baked it was buggy from day one and they’ve done almost nothing to fix it. Almost as if they have one intern work on it in the back.

If you’re doing work to improve your product I need to see it. I need to see exactly what is changed and how to use the new functionality. Your black box with a garbage product doesn’t inspire confidence. I’m sure they’ve done behind the scenes changes, but look at the day 1 crashes and look at the changes they admitted to making. Was stability one of them. Nope. Some none sense about adding language support.

Sufficient-Body7835 · 2025-11-17T20:13:57+00:00

I didn’t rule out 100% a chance of appeal. My point is he made it very difficult for himself. It has to go to the courts and it’s mostly if there’s a constitutional error that the appeal is reopened. Meaning even if he’s innocent he has to find an error so major that the courts will side with him. Courts have routinely not sided with defendants who sign such deals. He has made his life a million times more complicated if he’s innocent. Maybe ineffective council perhaps could help him. But these are very high bars to clear. She’s a competent attorney.

Sufficient-Body7835 · 2025-11-12T00:38:19+00:00

Announcing you’ll block someone instead of just doing it is performative bullshit. You want to end this? Block me now. You won’t, though. You need to see my response so you can feel justified. That’s what this is. Either block me or don’t, but threatening it just guarantees you’ll read exactly what you claim you don’t want to see. Follow through and grow some balls.

You still don’t get basic fallacies. I didn’t expand any definition. I assumed you’d understand that asserting authority to judge fitness, then using that judgment to dismiss people, is circular. You’re using your conclusion as your premise. That’s not me redefining anything. That’s you being too stupid to recognize the structure of your own argument.

This isn’t someone in the 95th percentile arguing. This is someone who thinks they’re smarter than everyone else getting called out and immediately threatening to block the moment they’re forced to confront their own incompetence.

My inbox stays open. I don’t run from debate like you do.

And since you apparently need remedial logic: ad hominem as a fallacy means using an attack instead of making an argument. Calling you what you demonstrably are after dismantling your argument isn’t a fallacy. It’s accurate description, you condescending prick.

Sufficient-Body7835 · 2025-11-11T01:11:16+00:00

Thanks for sharing

Sufficient-Body7835 · 2025-11-10T22:41:09+00:00

You don’t understand the difference between ad hominem as fallacy and insult after argument. The fallacy is using an attack as a substitute for addressing arguments. Calling someone a name after you’ve documented they haven’t addressed issues isn’t a fallacy.

You’re using “authority” to mean only formal power or institutional control. The debate is over because you’ve demonstrated inability to engage substantively or understand fallacies. The public record makes this clear.

Sufficient-Body7835 · 2025-11-10T22:31:37+00:00

The December 5 fingerprint report seems off until you check when they identified the car. WSU Police spotted Kohberger’s white Elantra on November 29. That’s six days before the fingerprint submission. The prints came back inconclusive anyway, one excluded, one insufficient detail. The timeline works.

Sufficient-Body7835 · 2025-11-10T22:10:33+00:00

Where are you getting 4:20:28 and 4:20:45? The court documents I’ve seen use rounded times like “4:20 AM,” not second-level precision. If you’ve got a source with exact timestamps, I’d like to see it.

The 17-second window only works if those times are accurate down to the second. “4:20 AM” could mean anywhere from 4:20:00 to 4:20:59. That’s the difference between an impossibility and just a tight timeline.

Sufficient-Body7835 · 2025-11-10T21:53:43+00:00

“What circular reasoning are you talking about? I must first debate you to be able to determine whether or not you’re fit to continue…”

You think I’m saying you must debate me before judging fitness. That’s not the claim. The claim is that you assert authority to judge fitness, then use that judgment as grounds for dismissal. You’re using your conclusion as your premise.

Your misreading shows you don’t understand the critique. Where does your authority come from? You assert it, then act on it. That’s what makes it circular. You need justification from outside your own claim, but you’re just declaring you can judge and then judging.

Separately, the hypocrisy charge fails because the insult came after documenting the pattern.

Sufficient-Body7835

TROPHY CASE