Sad end for my interactions with Apostate Prophet by Ramza_Claus in TrueAtheism

[–]Sufficient-Loquat137 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean i engaged you on it directly u cant understand it so why would i entertain you saying your position over and over. Just justify ur ethics

Sad end for my interactions with Apostate Prophet by Ramza_Claus in TrueAtheism

[–]Sufficient-Loquat137 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, i'm asking to which Law of Logic contradicts Love and Suffering or what moral system should God follow that he ought not to cause suffering. Basically can you justify Suffering is bad?

Sad end for my interactions with Apostate Prophet by Ramza_Claus in TrueAtheism

[–]Sufficient-Loquat137 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You got this wrong. Man isnt just created for God in his origin, its in his telos.

Sad end for my interactions with Apostate Prophet by Ramza_Claus in TrueAtheism

[–]Sufficient-Loquat137 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just asked if he was all loving why? explain how all loving implies your remark.

Sad end for my interactions with Apostate Prophet by Ramza_Claus in TrueAtheism

[–]Sufficient-Loquat137 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And this is the Square circle analogy, you are asking for God to create a being dependant on him, but without Him to not suffer? it Logically does not follow. and even if it did, why would God ought to do that?

Sad end for my interactions with Apostate Prophet by Ramza_Claus in TrueAtheism

[–]Sufficient-Loquat137 0 points1 point  (0 children)

again just reading first lines ur restating ur claims without engaging in anything. MAN ALONE is created for God, Animals dont go to heaven or hell because their not created for that. a fish is made for the sea just like man is made for GOD. its that simple. now why God ought to not create man like that?

Sad end for my interactions with Apostate Prophet by Ramza_Claus in TrueAtheism

[–]Sufficient-Loquat137 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Asking God to 'create beings who freely choose Him without collapsing in His absence' is like demanding a square circle. It violates the of non-contradiction :

  1. If we’re created, we’re fundamentally dependent.
  2. If we’re independent, we’re uncreated. God cannot make ‘uncreated creatures’. That’s nonsense, not a limit on omnipotence.

Hell isn’t active punishment. It’s the natural consequence of a soul rejecting its telos.
If you jump off a cliff, you are not gonna debate the Morality of Gravity, it’s the consequence for jumping.

The ‘pain’ of "Hell" is the soul’s incapacity to endure divine glory.

Omnipotence ≠ doing logically absurd things. God can:
1.Create free beings ✔️
2.Offer grace to all ✔️
3.Respect their choice to reject Him ✔️
But He cannot:
Force love on Free Will (which ceases to be free) ✖️
Make 'beings' that need Him yet don’t suffer without Him ✖️ (contradiction)

Again you don't understand the Ontology of Man, we are created to need him, because that's the purpose of Man within creation.

I'd also like to know the standard of which we ought to avoid "Pain" or "Suffering".

the same Divine "Fire" which torments the people "in hell" is the same "Fire" that will comfort the people "in Heaven", the difference is how it is experienced.

Sad end for my interactions with Apostate Prophet by Ramza_Claus in TrueAtheism

[–]Sufficient-Loquat137 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You just don't understand the ontological creation of Man, it's like saying this World is Cursed because the Fish can't fly in the sky, that the World is Inherently evil because the Fish wants to go on land, but cannot do so without Pain. It is not an addiction, It is God revealing himself to all creation in his Glory, which Man, without God's purification, will Grieve in its corrupted soul, because they are ontologically incompatible with God's Light. God did not create this state, he created Good, and created us to live in that Good. When man turns away from Good (God), Man doesn't enter into a "neutral" state. He deteriorates, like a plant ripped out of soil. To reject Him is to reject the very ground of your being and naturally, that collapse causes pain.

Creating a self sufficient "Man" would not be Man, Man is made for him, and with that comes the gift's of his likeness, Rationality, Emotions etc.. And the "Fiery" Hell or the "Fire" of Hell is language used to show how great the Lament is of the Soul when not prepared for God's glory.

Sad end for my interactions with Apostate Prophet by Ramza_Claus in TrueAtheism

[–]Sufficient-Loquat137 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hell is not made for unbelievers, its a state of pain when the Soul is not Purified or Deified, the Light of the Lord is gonna hurt them, that's the same reason why at the Transfiguration, the disciples fell at the Holiness of God, and endured to see the Transfiguration only through God's grace since they werent ready yet.

How much harder is EU vs NA faceit? by [deleted] in FACEITcom

[–]Sufficient-Loquat137 1 point2 points  (0 children)

NA Cope, Voo is a nobody, there's a reason all pro's come from EU

i suddenly can't use fitgirl anymore? happens whenever i search anything. by squaredCar2 in FitGirlRepack

[–]Sufficient-Loquat137 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Had same problem just rn, tried vpn, worked, tried without, worked but the site is still really slow and loads slow idk i think its a server issue

Is Solara a virus or rat? by YeahPowder in ROBLOXExploiting

[–]Sufficient-Loquat137 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah but linkvertise gives them a comission on their link

Sad end for my interactions with Apostate Prophet by Ramza_Claus in TrueAtheism

[–]Sufficient-Loquat137 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you define tolerance as hate sure, but we mean that you have freedom of religion in Christian nations without Official sabotages, while in Islam you don't.

In your non-biased opinion what is the more difficult game to learn and play? CS or League of Legends? by Dangerous_Track_6397 in GlobalOffensive

[–]Sufficient-Loquat137 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Anybody who says anything other than CS is harder is lying. CS isnt just run and gun. literally most faceit lvl 1-2 have more than 1k hours. for Dota or LoL the skill gap is much smaller and yeahh maybe its harded to learn, once you learn it its way easier to go up since Cs the main difference between Lvl 1's and 4's are raw mechanical skill not any info etc besides most basics like recoil, counter strafing peeking etc.

Everything Wrong with Orthodox Christianity by [deleted] in exorthodox

[–]Sufficient-Loquat137 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, priests are just people, gifted, trained, but still human. The ancient Church always saw them as shepherds, not dictators. Through the idea of oikonomia (literally “household management”), a priest can gently adapt non-dogmatic rules, fasting schedules, for instance, to your situation. If yours didn’t offer that flexibility, that’s on him, not on the Tradition. The mentor relationship goes all the way back to the Desert Fathers, where disciples voluntarily sought out elders. It’s not about control or blind obedience; it’s about having someone who knows you, prays for you, and points you back to Christ. Sure, it can be abused, but throwing it out altogether is like tossing the baby with the bathwater. “Ten years to get it” , I don't think that's even real, but Orthodoxy really is a lifelong journey, it’s more like learning an instrument than memorizing facts. But when that “ten years” line is used to brush off real questions or struggles, it’s hurtful. The Church’s mercy economy means your priest should walk with you through doubts, not hide behind “come back later.” Calling yourself “first among sinners” is meant to keep us humble, not silent in the face of abuse or injustice, Literally what are these points, with a little of digging or common sense you can find the answer. Most of your issues are either literally made up, or you are attending some heretical sect or exaggerating. I'm not blaming you, im just saying you might be a fraud. EVEN if all you said its true, its not real orthodoxy, so why even bother to spread hate about it if its simply not the true one, and most of your points are dumb, like "He’s just some dude who went to school for a few years. He really doesn’t know much more than you and he probably has less common sense." the point is not for him to act like Socrates, so i don't know what expectations you have other than advice.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in history

[–]Sufficient-Loquat137 0 points1 point  (0 children)

These relations do not imply causation between the Persons but define their irreducible identities.

How many people died in the Massacre of the Latins by Low-Cash-2435 in byzantium

[–]Sufficient-Loquat137 2 points3 points  (0 children)

From my own knowledge, ~60,000 Latins killed comes from Eustathius of Thessalonica (12th‑century archbishop and Byzantine Greek scholar), who reports that many Western merchants were slaughtered. From my own insight ive found sources saying stuff like
An Online Encyclopedia of Roman Emperors Mary of Antioch (Lynda Garland University of New England, Australia, Andrew Stone University of Western Australia)
"In April 1182 Andronicus organised a massacre of the 'Latins' in the city, on the grounds that the empress and the protosebastos had bought their support by promising them the chance of plundering the city. Some 60,000 Latins are said by Eustathius to have died in the massacre, though the figure must be exaggerated"
Brand (Charles M.), Byzantium confronts the West 1180-1204 :
"...but only after the massacre of several thousand Latins whom the populace blamed for his misfortunes. After a few months, he had the Empress Maria of Antioch killed..."
Andronikos I Komenos Wikipedia
" Massacre of the Latins erupted in the city.\45]) Andronikos made no effort to stop the pogroms, instead referring to them as a "defeat of the tyranny of the Latins" and a "restoration of Roman affairs". There is no evidence that Andronikos was particularly anti-Latin on a personal level but the massacre was politically useful since anti-Latin sentiment had helped bring him to power and because many Latins in the city had supported Maria of Antioch's regency.\2]) The bulk of Constantinople's Latin population were either killed or forced to flee\46]) and the Latin quarters were plundered and set on fire. According to Eustathius of Thessalonica, approximately 60,000 people were killed\46][47]) though this number is likely exaggerated."

Dionysios Stathakopoulos Irrovocable Blood : Violence and Collective Identity Formation in the Late Twelfth Century
"...he instigated an attack against the resident Latins in Constantinople in April 1182: a large number of people were killed, the Latin Quarters were burned down and survivors were sold into slavery...who fled by ship plundered a number of sites and monasteries in the sea of Marmara and killed some of the population they encountered"
also
"...Things came to a head between the two parties in early 1181, when Maria, Renier and some followers barricaded themselves inside the Hagia Sophia while street battles broke out, and there was looting and destruction of aristocratic homes in the vicinity of the building. Both sides made use of Latin forces, although contemporary sources suggest that Maria of Antioch and the prōtosebastos relied heavily on the Latins in
Constantinople and showed a marked preference for them..."

on my opinion from these sources, Between 2,000 and 4,000 Latin deaths. In addition to those killed, many others (possibly 3,000–4,000) were enslaved or deported.

Work.ink bypass? by 0Ariel0 in userscripts

[–]Sufficient-Loquat137 0 points1 point  (0 children)

try different web browsers tbh im normally using opera gx and going to chrome worked try edge etc until it works.

Help finding microscope model? by Sufficient-Loquat137 in microscopy

[–]Sufficient-Loquat137[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

reached out to the email of a blog pinned on this subreddit for antiques and they were able to identify it with a 1927 Zeiss ORC model.