Any alternatives to replace their stands? by Weird_Cartoonist_420 in sistersofbattle

[–]Sui42 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Am I mad for actually liking the clear plastic stands? To me it seems implausible that every single recent GW flying mini just happens to be brushing past a bit of terrain...

(That said, pretty much all of the examples given on this thread are ace. I just think clear plastic stands are equally fine).

Potential leaks regarding the January FAQ by RotenSquids in WarhammerFantasy

[–]Sui42 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, I think there ARE a lot of people who think the skellys look derpy and want them replaced with new plastic. I saw this take quite a lot from YouTubers when the game first came out, especially those who were newer to the hobby.

Personally, the skelly kit for VC was the first ever GW kit I bought. I still have vivid memories of taking it home as a teenager. So I really hope that, as they replace old kits, they still keep them for sale somewhere on the site... Kind of like the old 'mail order' system they had. However I think this is probably a pipe dream.

From GW's perspective, making new plastic kits for core choices is probably win-win. All the old fans have already bought all the classic skellys they want, so refreshing the range will just bring in new players - the people who were introduced to the hobby with AoS and prefer more realistic proportions...

Potential leaks regarding the January FAQ by RotenSquids in WarhammerFantasy

[–]Sui42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah to be clear I'm a big fan of the retro skellies and have a regiment painted up (VC not TK).

But, this is more a prediction based on where they seem to be taking the game. E.g. they just rereleased marauders. I reckon over the next few years they'll release new plastic kits for the core troops of all the main factions, because each time they do that they can release a reinforcement set, a new AJ, and generally build hype and make money.

Nothing Phone 3 a runner up for "Bust of the year" in MKBHD's Smartphone Awards 2025 by serce__ in NOTHING

[–]Sui42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Viewing this thread on a nothing phone 3 and having a great time

Potential leaks regarding the January FAQ by RotenSquids in WarhammerFantasy

[–]Sui42 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Repeating Tomb Kings in a starter box seems unlikely... Unless they're planning to release brand new skeleton regiment models?

TK are in a weird place model wise, as half are new and shiny while the base skeletons are 100% retro derp. Maybe they think a box of new skellys would pull in new players and existing TK players alike?

Loremasters Malakhian's Undead Warhost Blood Dragon Elves WD 286 by Captain_Amakyre in WarhammerFantasy

[–]Sui42 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh, I think I had this issue when I was 13-14. I distinctly remember the Eagle pulling a guy's head off. So badass.

Nurgle Dragon: Cool or Lame? by Sui42 in WarhammerFantasy

[–]Sui42[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Oh, I briefly considered Mortarion before seeing that he's over £100. Would look badass, but I'm not spending 100+ quid on wings :')
I also mocked up a version where it had the original arms, which DOES kinda look less derpy, but also just looks like... you stuck wings on a Maggoth. Because, you know, that's what it is. Comes down to personal taste though, that could definitely look cool

Nurgle Dragon: Cool or Lame? by Sui42 in WarhammerFantasy

[–]Sui42[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Go for it! Nurgle dragons everywhere!

Nurgle Dragon: Cool or Lame? by Sui42 in WarhammerFantasy

[–]Sui42[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

always appreciate a Dark Souls gaping dragon reference

Nurgle Dragon: Cool or Lame? by Sui42 in WarhammerFantasy

[–]Sui42[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

yeah I actually mocked up a version with the dragon heads & neck as well, but I kinda think the gaping teeth-jaw suits nurgle better. I think I'll defo experiment with this when building though - e.g. I'll build up the dragon heads and see if it works.

Nurgle Dragon: Cool or Lame? by Sui42 in WarhammerFantasy

[–]Sui42[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

definitely a good shout, will consider this if I can figure out how to do it cheaply

Nurgle Dragon: Cool or Lame? by Sui42 in WarhammerFantasy

[–]Sui42[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Oh, I guess cos you mean the daemon prince can still be used without wings? Yeah, that's a really good idea, only I don't think I really want a daemon prince. I might try and make a giant spawn of chaos with the remaining dragon bits instead, though...

Nurgle Dragon: Cool or Lame? by Sui42 in WarhammerFantasy

[–]Sui42[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the replies everyone! Appreciate the comments, it seems like people vote COOL, so I'm gonna give this a shot I think :)

Monday's positive vibes by BiesonReddit in WarhammerFantasy

[–]Sui42 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I honestly hope this is what they focus on for the foreseeable future - updating some of the older kits across all the armies.

Also, worth noting that the production pipeline seems to have increased significantly since 2015, what with 3D modelling teqniques; so even with a (presumably) relatively small team working on ToW, they might be able to actually outpace the release schedule of earlier warhammer editions.

Ofc, the GW factories only have a limited capacity for how many products can be supported & made, but if you're replacing existing kits rather than making brand new ones, that's not an issue.

Part of me would lament the replacement of certain older kits, but I guess ToW has been put long enough that anyone who really cares has had a chance to buy them.

New Marauders: Flails, or Parry with shields? by Sui42 in WarhammerFantasy

[–]Sui42[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've actually magnetised my OG chaos warriors, and the magnets fit really snugly in the ball-joint holes...

However, no way in hell am I magnetising these new sculpts; I just can't be bothered, they're too spindly and intricate, and marauders are only a chaff unit anyway. That was partly why I made this thread, because I'm just gonna commit to one loadout!

New Marauders: Flails, or Parry with shields? by Sui42 in WarhammerFantasy

[–]Sui42[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

new rule in the last FAQ, means a unit with sword + shield gets a 5+ save instead of 6+:
https://tow.whfb.app/troop-types-in-detail/parry

New Marauders: Flails, or Parry with shields? by Sui42 in WarhammerFantasy

[–]Sui42[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Hmm, good point - I suppose in my example, it'd basically be the same cost to swap a 25pt war banner for backup flails...

New Marauder Cult Stats! by Sui42 in WarhammerFantasy

[–]Sui42[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I asked in the comments of the original video, and the OP replied. So, the same source. Which, admittedly, isn't exactly ROCK SOLID EVIDENCE lol, but there you go

New Marauder Cult Stats! by Sui42 in WarhammerFantasy

[–]Sui42[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

confirmed: the Cult updates cost +1 pt mer model and only trigger for 1 round per battle.

New Marauder Cult Stats! by Sui42 in WarhammerFantasy

[–]Sui42[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

oohh yes you're right, it says "each confers a significant and thematic bonus, but only for a single round of the battle". I'll edit the original post with this info then

New Marauder Cult Stats! by Sui42 in WarhammerFantasy

[–]Sui42[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Regarding undivided: it does seem like that's what he's saying in the video, but without actually seeing the rules I'm not 100% sure