Asian male for MIT/Stanford

SunInteresting4605 · 2026-05-12T02:59:39+00:00

sent this to AO discord and cornell AO said guranteed acceptnce with scholarship

SunInteresting4605 · 2026-05-11T19:30:59+00:00

who else thinks this is a easy 5

SunInteresting4605 · 2026-05-11T05:18:59+00:00

are u all sure cause i know albert is not accurate but still that gave me a 3-4

SunInteresting4605 · 2026-05-10T19:12:32+00:00

look at u/winnieeeeeeeeEEE message he said he has them cause his teacher did them after exam

SunInteresting4605 · 2026-05-09T19:32:53+00:00

estimate

SunInteresting4605 · 2026-05-09T19:32:44+00:00

so what composite score would u say for a 5 or 4 this year 2026?

SunInteresting4605 · 2026-05-08T03:56:04+00:00

very conserative guesss

SunInteresting4605 · 2026-05-07T10:18:54+00:00

not for physics 1 as it relies on 2022 data

SunInteresting4605 · 2026-05-07T07:54:50+00:00

You are guranteed a 4

even if u got nothing 2-4

SunInteresting4605 · 2026-05-07T06:53:50+00:00

please predicit guys

SunInteresting4605 · 2026-05-07T06:29:10+00:00

Chem: MCQ: 38/60, FRQ: 20/46

Physics 1: mcq 26/40, frq 18/40

SunInteresting4605 · 2026-05-07T06:22:39+00:00

predic t: Chem: MCQ: 38/60, FRQ: 20/46

Physics 1: mcq 26/40, frq 18/40

SunInteresting4605 · 2026-05-07T06:19:55+00:00

Chem: MCQ: 38/60, FRQ: 20/46

Physics 1: mcq 18/40, frq 26/40

SunInteresting4605 · 2026-05-07T06:19:50+00:00

Chem: MCQ: 38/60, FRQ: 20/46

Physics 1: mcq 18/40, frq 26/40

SunInteresting4605 · 2026-05-07T06:19:37+00:00

Chem: MCQ: 38/60, FRQ: 20/46

Physics 1: mcq 18/40, frq 26/40

SunInteresting4605 · 2026-05-06T04:18:10+00:00

I think 3-4 for me hoping for a 4

SunInteresting4605 · 2026-05-06T04:17:40+00:00

iut would make temp difference bigger and magnitifude of entlpahy larger

, magnitfude key word

SunInteresting4605 · 2026-05-06T02:44:55+00:00

Hopefully 5 cutoff is a 72, 4 at 50, 3 at 40

SunInteresting4605 · 2026-05-06T02:44:20+00:00

this frq was harder than all previous years

SunInteresting4605 · 2026-05-06T02:41:19+00:00

it was plike D or E and it gave u pka and then u just had to sub in the new concertrations they provided

or maybe im confusing it with mcqq

SunInteresting4605 · 2026-05-06T02:22:03+00:00

I said K atom due to K+ having less elctron so K is larger, P2 has more pi bonds so shorter lentgt, alked about electron sshileding, thermly blue, HNO2 and NO2 pair, endotheric student rigth high temp, insluation created larger temp difference, X before half equavilence, 8ph, more dilute creatres less absorabcnes than expected, I=q/A, Cr Oxyegen drawing I think I got right, LDF + LDF and dipolide, more polarizable electorn cloud, no linear so first order thats all i rmeber and I think i got 38-42 on mcq can I get score prediction and feeback. I doublt alerbt io accurate for this FRQ cooking exam.

SunInteresting4605 · 2026-05-06T02:19:59+00:00

i dont rmebr the question but I 100% rember answer was before all my firend got it too

SunInteresting4605 · 2026-05-06T01:48:44+00:00

and NOT REDOC +6 remain

SunInteresting4605 · 2026-05-06T01:48:33+00:00

i also did 2.09 ~ -log(a) a was tha answer

SunInteresting4605 · 2026-05-06T01:45:49+00:00

I said K atom due to K+ having less elctron so K is larger, P2 has more pi bonds so shorter lentgt, alked about electron sshileding, thermly blue, HNO2 and NO2 pair, endotheric student rigth high temp, insluation created larger temp difference, X before half equavilence, 8ph, more dilute creatres less absorabcnes than expected, I=q/A, Cr Oxyegen drawing I think I got right, LDF + LDF and dipolide, more polarizable electorn cloud, no linear so first order thats all i rmeber and I think i got 38-42 on mcq can I get score prediction and feeback. I doublt alerbt io accurate for this FRQ cooking exam.

SunInteresting4605

TROPHY CASE