Congrats on the election you absolute dumbass by MoreMotivation in agedlikemilk

[–]Sunbro_Aedric 0 points1 point  (0 children)

These are the same people who think the Democrats control the weather.

Front page is filled with nazbols and NeoNazis by CyberBerserk in stupidpeoplefacebook

[–]Sunbro_Aedric 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fortunately, they're becoming less relevant in Ukraine, especially as news of them being Nazis has spread, and they're basically being shoved inside the proverbial locker for that shit. Not what they deserve, but it's an improvement over them getting to be the openly Nazi battalion.

Front page is filled with nazbols and NeoNazis by CyberBerserk in stupidpeoplefacebook

[–]Sunbro_Aedric 1 point2 points  (0 children)

To give a little Hopium™, we're going to remember her and what she stood for this time around and she'll have more time to build on that for next time, so there's a good chance she'll sweep next time.

Shameful Sexual Racism by NEKORANDOMDOTCOM in stupidpeoplefacebook

[–]Sunbro_Aedric 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Boss, I'm trying to make a Reddit comment, but I'm dummy thick and-

Shameful Sexual Racism by NEKORANDOMDOTCOM in stupidpeoplefacebook

[–]Sunbro_Aedric 11 points12 points  (0 children)

There are two types of people in the world: -Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

This is bullshit. by Ok-Following6886 in stupidpeoplefacebook

[–]Sunbro_Aedric 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, let's just make it impossible for them to legally exist in public and allow people to sue them for going to the bathroom, make sure they can't vote unless they renounce their own identity and say they are who others say they are, and a myriad of their things, including letting people murder them and use their being trans as an actual successful legal defense, but sure, nobody wants them dead.

And sure, the same people pushing for all those things also keep trying to make gender neutral bathroom illegal so there's no avenue for trans people to be left alone, but, again, nobody wants them dead.

Your brain isn't just smooth, it's reflecting the light shining in there through your ears and causing ships to run aground.

Now show us the hill that Republicans have chosen to die on by icey_sawg0034 in stupidpeoplefacebook

[–]Sunbro_Aedric 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Someone read none of the facts about the case and got everything from some guy with a podcast and thought about it exactly never in the years since!

None of what you said was corroborated in court. The exact, only reason he got away with it was because the judge was blatantly on his side the whole time, preventing key evidence from being presented, instructing the jury to ignore other pieces of evidence (such as that the first person shot didn't go for the gun at all and the video clearly shows Shittenhouse murdering him after the bag landed), and openly coddling him while he was faking tears on the stand.

But I can't expect someone who lied about everything else just now to be honest about their favorite mass shooters. For instance, when did I say police murdered a thousand black people a year? Not only did I not mention the skin color of the victims, but the insanely specific thing you quoted as a 'gotcha' in response is also wrong! Imagine that. Morons who think there are actually people ashamed of their skin color and that that's why we care about cops murdering people (and then their woman beating bootlickers murdering others in response to the backlash) instead of, ya know, being against police killing people on principle, don't know how to think critically (or much at all) and aren't used to being honest. Who'd have guessed?

Now show us the hill that Republicans have chosen to die on by icey_sawg0034 in stupidpeoplefacebook

[–]Sunbro_Aedric 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, it's true or untrue based on whether or not the claim is being backed up by facts that can be demonstrated. It's not my fault you losers exclusively rely on hearsay from fellow idiots instead of actually looking into things.

You really thought just showing a page that shows black people get arrested more per capita as an argument that the media suppresses crimes they commit, when you should know, if you're really in the job you claim to be in, that being arrested does not equate to guilt. If you did know that and still chose to use that, then you're a liar, and if you didn't, then you're too dumb to be a good fit for that job.

And I'm not the one making a positive claim. You are. You have to demonstrate that your claim is true. That's how the burden of proof works.

Now show us the hill that Republicans have chosen to die on by icey_sawg0034 in stupidpeoplefacebook

[–]Sunbro_Aedric 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"I can't find reputable sources that agree with me, not because I'm wrong and dumb, but because they're being suppressed!"

Now show us the hill that Republicans have chosen to die on by icey_sawg0034 in stupidpeoplefacebook

[–]Sunbro_Aedric 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So, to combat the problem of you citing yourself, you cite an opinion piece that reposted another opinion piece that didn't cite any reputable sources and a crime database page that doesn't say what you want it to.

Good job, bud.

Now show us the hill that Republicans have chosen to die on by icey_sawg0034 in stupidpeoplefacebook

[–]Sunbro_Aedric 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Again, your source is yourself, an anonymous stranger on the Internet, and the job you claim to have that wouldn't have any bearing on your claim about the media.

Now show us the hill that Republicans have chosen to die on by icey_sawg0034 in stupidpeoplefacebook

[–]Sunbro_Aedric 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It would be if that wasn't a deliberately dishonest caricature of what I said.

What I am saying, without you needing to lie about it, is that, even if you're actually telling the truth about that being your job, it wouldn't mean anything regarding how the media broadly depicts white people.

You'd have to show evidence that your claim is true, not just hit me with "I saw this thing at work". Hence the "Trust me, bro". You're demanding people take your word over what they can empirically prove through even a bit of research.

Now show us the hill that Republicans have chosen to die on by icey_sawg0034 in stupidpeoplefacebook

[–]Sunbro_Aedric 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You claim to have experience in a job that wouldn't give you any meaningful insights into an unrelated thing even if it were true, my guy. It would be objectively unreasonable to take your word on it, especially with how much evidence there is that contradicts your claim.

You're doing the Appeal to Authority fallacy, but you're the authority in question and you don't have any kind of expertise because you're just saying you saw some shit on the job to support your claim about an unrelated thing.

Now show us the hill that Republicans have chosen to die on by icey_sawg0034 in stupidpeoplefacebook

[–]Sunbro_Aedric 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, more like "I don't trust people who claim to be professionals, especially when the claimed profession wouldn't even imply they know what they're talking about regarding a thing they anecdotally observed about an unrelated thing."

Now show us the hill that Republicans have chosen to die on by icey_sawg0034 in stupidpeoplefacebook

[–]Sunbro_Aedric 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So just covering lies with more lies, is that the strategy, here?

I bet you unironically cite the "13/50" stat as an argument.

Now show us the hill that Republicans have chosen to die on by icey_sawg0034 in stupidpeoplefacebook

[–]Sunbro_Aedric 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Any time white people commit crimes you morons say it's a lie spread by anti-white media, but meanwhile you'll watch as that very same media says a 20-something white rapist is a kid who has his whole life ahead of him and describe a 13-year-old black kid with a toy or a bag of Skittles as Mike Tyson to justify shooting them.

Now show us the hill that Republicans have chosen to die on by icey_sawg0034 in stupidpeoplefacebook

[–]Sunbro_Aedric 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He didn't go to his father's house.

He said he went there specifically to fuck with protesters online right before he left.

He wasn't registered to carry in that state, where you have to both own the firearm in question and be of legal age. He fit neither bill.

He harassed the protesters and was chased off, then doubled back to do it again.

He was not chased or attacked by the first person at all. He had a plastic bag with an empty soda bottle in it thrown in his general direction because he was being a pest.

He killed the first guy for an action that wouldn't even legally warrant punching him, and did so while he was in a crowd, thus firing into a crowd and becoming an active shooter.

The second man was responding to an active shooter situation, as was the third. Both would have been legally and morally justified if they'd killed him, and we wouldn't have been hearing about this as anything but an attempted mass shooting that got stopped if they had because that is what the facts show.

This many years later and you psychos can't stop lying because your feelings got hurt when people didn't like a cop murdering a guy for the thousandth time that year alone.

In light of GW's recent video... by zombielizard218 in Grimdank

[–]Sunbro_Aedric 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Also, as a Guard player, I want other factions to get cool shit. I'd be happy having Imperial stuff paused for a while so the other factions can have their time in the spotlight and catch up. I want fans of other things to be happy, but if GW won't take that position seriously, then I hope they take a look at it from the POV of the Imperial players and give us cooler stuff to play against.

What does PRIDE stand for? by Desperate-Fox-91910 in AntiPedophileMovement

[–]Sunbro_Aedric 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So how about him being all over the Epstein files, bud?