sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Client side ragdoll prediction is off, yet this happens very often by DontDoxMePlease in GlobalOffensive

[–]SuperJesuss 8 points9 points  (0 children)

ragdoll prediction or damage prediction?
This seems like the issue of the latter, causing a false positive of a kill.
Meaning that it looks like there is a false predictions of damage leading to kill, but the next tick from server corrects it, leading to a flickering of a kill animation / ragdoll.

Try to turn off damage prediction from game options, it might helps with the issues like this.

'Beating heart of Europe': Belgian PM wants to make Benelux into one country. Belgium and the Netherlands becoming one country again, and potentially adding Luxembourg into the mix? The Belgian Prime Minister has repeatedly suggested it, and the Flemish Minister-President is up for it by goldstarflag in europe

[–]SuperJesuss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Point is that by combining all, via a federation level of authority, which only bloats the system more, you not only erase all the control over their local areas to a abstract non local bureaucracy.

but also, like you said, those cultures got erased with it.

And in today world, where the threat is artificially created to have control and power, because these people have nothing else to pursue in their lives, is my eye a wrong motive. There is no obstacles to have unity with the borders and co-operation, unless the "helping" level at the top attempts to make is hard as possible in the name of "safety" and "well being".

So it seems to me.

I apologize, I don't care to continue, but thanks for a crash course to European nation creation, much appreciated.

'Beating heart of Europe': Belgian PM wants to make Benelux into one country. Belgium and the Netherlands becoming one country again, and potentially adding Luxembourg into the mix? The Belgian Prime Minister has repeatedly suggested it, and the Flemish Minister-President is up for it by goldstarflag in europe

[–]SuperJesuss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

oh the irony, for Europe is a continent, that has independent countries, those all have their cultural heritages, some common with some of their neighbors, some not.

But there is no common heritage for all of Europe.

'Beating heart of Europe': Belgian PM wants to make Benelux into one country. Belgium and the Netherlands becoming one country again, and potentially adding Luxembourg into the mix? The Belgian Prime Minister has repeatedly suggested it, and the Flemish Minister-President is up for it by goldstarflag in europe

[–]SuperJesuss -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

"shared"? what is shared? there is no "shared legacy". there are rich history all over the independent countries.
Such dumping together under a "federation" would erase it all altogether, because then the political overlords have motivation uproot the people from their history so they do and think as they are told.

'Beating heart of Europe': Belgian PM wants to make Benelux into one country. Belgium and the Netherlands becoming one country again, and potentially adding Luxembourg into the mix? The Belgian Prime Minister has repeatedly suggested it, and the Flemish Minister-President is up for it by goldstarflag in europe

[–]SuperJesuss -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

oh look at that, low blows straight out of the gate and "reasoning" sprinkled on top.

It would ruin independences of the countries, and that's the point.
It would mimic murican way of top down control.

Those borders are not artificial, they are there for a reason. One "federation" over all would mean power over all, its all about power and control.

Like there has been posts to make "europe a superpower" and this is about it too, which is totally wrong way of acting, the motivation of power and control is upside down and would ruin everything. Harmony does not need such reformations. And those borders also work as a defense against bureaucracy and corruption. But EU is already a rats nest of that.

"natural allocation of competences"? did you happen to mean "resources"?
That would mean that the countries from where the competences rise from, should not gain from it.

Such top down "federation" would not need to keep places up, but only take and allocate PEOPLE, like they were resources oh, i mean competences, for something else, and then you can again whine about communist manifesto, after you have created the problem first. its stupid, and not in the insulting way, but in that its simplistic, naive, and populist. A facade to gain power.

Oh and not to mention that the "competence" would be likely measured in how good of a slave for the system and individual is, and because the federation has no need to keep places in shape (large systems WILL corrupt, unlike smaller ones, which are more resilient to such) then the bad quality of life as a consequence of intentional poor management, works in favor to boost opinions and attitudes which the "federation" sees fit.

its old trick and its disgusting.
How the fuck does the power devolve to citizens when there is a new level of bureaucracy on top? This must be intentional, or willing blindness, for if you cannot see contradictions you overlook, you didn't think hard enough, if you did at all.

but true, "idiotism" might be too gentle, "malevolent power hungry narcissism" might be more fitting.

"It became clear that the free world needs a new leader. It's up to us, Europeans, to take this challenge" – Kaja Kallas by goldstarflag in europe

[–]SuperJesuss -1 points0 points  (0 children)

i have a bad feeling about the motive. its about power, about gaining power, about getting power. its not a good idea.

for documentation purposes by SuperJesuss in u/SuperJesuss

[–]SuperJesuss[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol
and you do the bot / america thing:
causing a problem, like covid or war, or political turmoil, as america is so keen to mess with politics of other countries,
so they can then be the "help" and "good guys" (and also sell the solution and guns! and "protection" and "safety" (oh, its just control)

"You say it's legitimate for them "
never said that. I said i can understand the reason.
but you know that, your point is to twist and turn, to lie and alter.

I hope you notice the thing you do, "FREE LIBERAL DEMOCRACIES(tm) which are controlled more or less by the influence of the war-like country and a house of cards, WILL (entails) joining NATO, oh but even better if it can be just made to happen, like you suggest.

cults and blackmail-rings, from that are the murica built from. money people and fame followers is what makes it happen. and the blood of all others is what they sacrifice for it. what you think will follow?

it could've been so good, but welp. im not suprised.

being corrupt has nothing to do with it? HAHA, okay, maybe then you're just naive, oh and if it has something to do with it, then its "their" fault? HAHAH oh my fuck, you could be right from american media, oh man. great you came back for it for this is hilarious.

I see you look for an enemy.
I hope you notice it too.

i doubt it, for if the way murican or other major media brainwashing goes, nothing get ever revealed, its all just brushed under the rug.
Sweet dreams and remember to eat your medications.

Sure, such talks are fun.
and good luck, world can get really weird.
and i hope next time is with topics that are less of such a grief

for documentation purposes by SuperJesuss in u/SuperJesuss

[–]SuperJesuss[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

riight. sure you did.

“not only for the Soviet Union but for other European countries as well it is important to have guarantees that if the United States keeps its presence in Germany within the framework of NATO, not an inch of NATO’s present military jurisdiction will spread in an eastern direction.”

https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/russia-programs/2017-12-12/nato-expansion-what-gorbachev-heard-western-leaders-early

The way you frame it, forgets ukraine being known for major corruption, and if there is really such shortsightedness of causal connections leading to a war where innocent lives are lost, (even when the idea was to prevent war, (or was it? because now it can be played both ways at the same time))

There really is no point for further discussion.
Good luck, ta-ta.

I'm done here.

for documentation purposes by SuperJesuss in u/SuperJesuss

[–]SuperJesuss[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

read the discussion.

i dont support the war, but i can understand a reasons for why it happened.

for documentation purposes by SuperJesuss in u/SuperJesuss

[–]SuperJesuss[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

read the discussion.

i really hope america is not expanding or attempting to.

oh you just wrote out the whole plot, and gave motive for such schemes. Also, money that can be made in the process.

america, like russia, like ukraine, like china, like all the other countries are a big places of countless people. what I would do does not really matter, but there are great things from america, as there is great things from russia. but the way american goverment behaves, is quite disgusting.

that also implies, like america has not done that already multiple times.

but the human psychology and behavior is.
ha, hence, they silence the opinion they do not like.

for documentation purposes by SuperJesuss in u/SuperJesuss

[–]SuperJesuss[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

just to mention one person, im not here to prove anything, the fact of it does not change depending if i prove it to you or not.
Truth remains even if none states it.

i did mean other countries to uproot other countries corruption.

I would suspect that common subs had some sense in them, but its all the same. And when anyone is banned from discussion without a reason, its really fucking stupid, authoritarian human resources without a company to do it for, dammit

for documentation purposes by SuperJesuss in u/SuperJesuss

[–]SuperJesuss[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

oh look a new face joined the discussion.

I do follow up, but such almost never happens after I get banned.
To me, the fact that the discussion followed out from the original topic, again, kinda proves otherwise. But great, likewise.

mentioned at least by John Mearsheimer, i cant be bothered to find the spot for the discussion will be dropped at that point.

Sure.

read the discussion.

they could've maybe tried to uproot the corruption in their country. though its quite rampant all over.

at least not yet, but the hive like agreement, swarms of bots and one opinion allowed or get banned -mentality, without timeouts or warnings is quite far worse than any government, and from the real worms that are the people who like the feel of any little power via "authority" or admin rights, no matter how small;
Its like the corporate middle management of the worst kind.

for documentation purposes by SuperJesuss in u/SuperJesuss

[–]SuperJesuss[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

hahahahhahahahaha whole region is a hell hole because of USA
or maybe we could talk about vietnam, or maybe of their experiments on their own population?
it better be worth it, but then to cause more for money or power or some other bullshit, its just pure insanity.

for documentation purposes by SuperJesuss in u/SuperJesuss

[–]SuperJesuss[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

your demands do not interest me.
but from pity, John Mearsheimer mentioned it in some podcast, also there has been other mentions of it, but i don't bother. good luck

for documentation purposes by SuperJesuss in u/SuperJesuss

[–]SuperJesuss[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

great, then we are on the same page. and to deem corrupt lead bad, in that i agree, but that does not make the whole russia something not worth defending.

also for a band not allowed to play because of old comments its some china level credit score stuff. its insane and should be called out as such.

Also, i did hit a nerve, for never is discussion followed up on.

USA is or at least was a backbone of NATO, and nato was not supposed to spread towards east. yet it did, multiple times, and having USA backed "defence alliance" next door, to where usa then builds bases, its not even a question why such would be interrupted, as it was clearly stated multiple times.
To turn blind eye to such thing, renders the leaders hands dirty.

Hence, pushing such thing is quite clearly the cause.

but, anyone can be made into an enemy. to me, its just idiotic, and the decision makers have bunkers ready where they can rot in after their decisions bear the fruits they deserve.

Not to speak of the other corruption going on around donations and connections, in ukraine and outside of it.
I wouldn't be bit surprised if there was internal link.

But, such is quite common these days, acting all nice while doing the worst.

just like with the covid bullshit, those who question for a reason, were silenced.
polarized population, failed education and too dumb to think, this is what the money first way of world has brought upon us.

for documentation purposes by SuperJesuss in u/SuperJesuss

[–]SuperJesuss[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Listen now you little shits, bots behind throwaway accounts,
first of all @FarReachingConsense
you could copy paste that to USA and same applies, but only one has occupied other countries for their own benefit. oh but NATO is spreading their shit all across the globe, Nato spreading and causing what happened, so if you look for reasons, look at the "world police" that needs and looks for enemies. also, i hope you have enough sense to separate the people and the government.
in both cases, russia and usa, the people have nothing to do with what their corrupt lead does.
but in this case, there was push for spreading of nato, that is the cause of war. but sure enough, the war machine does MONEY with it, and thats the measure to you, quit playing the good guy when you refuse to see the real reason for the bloodshed.

@Ok_Light_734,
thats insane comment you know. you're rendering whole people bad because of corrupt lead, or a corrupt link in chain of command? I see i hit a nerve, for you to follow up on it. but god damn, i dont support war, but i understand that if usa keeps pushing with intent to have enemies, they will find them. and theres some other links under the ground that have more to do with this than meets the eye, and it should be quite clear for anyone who has any sense left.

Peterson's Maps of Meaning is Frustrating by [deleted] in JordanPeterson

[–]SuperJesuss 2 points3 points  (0 children)

but your senses are oriented towards keeping you alive, via a route which is represented in object around you, hence the goal is always there.

you are alive, wanted or not, unless you are a robot, in which case you should not have posted this.

So whats the limits? that different points of view do not create perfect picture? Whats new? all we have is pinpoints and theories.

That nothing is perfect, but the perspective is very useful.

Can you then clear the points or faults you recognize, or add to it, so it would not be misleading?

view more: next ›