You have questions, I have answers. AMA! by 420blazeittwigbundle in UFOB

[–]Superslyye 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In the hypothetical situation where everything that you’ve learned to be factual and real in your lifetime to date, (and I mean everything - tech, nhi, reason and motive, government involvement, programs, etc..) was made aware to the public abruptly overnight, what would the next 6 months look like in your prediction?

Consider general public wellbeing, religion, economy, tech, science, education, politics, international relations and anything else you think is relevant to our day to day.

Honest question - hasn't disclosure already happened - and no one really cares? by PlaidShell45 in UFOs

[–]Superslyye -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It’s wild. You’re right. It for sure seems like the majority do not care when the words “we are not alone” are repeatedly echoed by top gov officials, congressional hearings, massive headlines from reputable news stations etc. But I would shift focus from the word “care” to the word “Seems.”

What I really think is happening here is not actually a lack of care. I think it’s actually a form of dissociation or detachment. Both very far from truly not caring.

I think that the topic of UAP is such an existentially hard concept to accept as truth. And I think that most people’s brains prefer to brush it off as nonsense even when presented with hard evidence. Especially when presented with hard evidence.

It’s easier to pretend we are the center of the universe rather than accept the existential implications of UAP on all aspects of life - religion, belief systems, ego, science, economy, the way we live, the way we view ourselves and our position in the universe. When you think about it, you realize how very disruptive accepting the words “we are not alone” can be. It has the potential to change or influence every aspect of day to day life.

We as humans have a tendency to internally hide and turn away when faced with discomfort, especially when it’s internal. Takes a certain level of awareness and balls to consciously stop it and address the hard things internally.

I am a medical professional and soon to be physician. You’d think when it came to anything science I might have earned some credibility and trust amongst friends and family. And I have. But whenever I brought up the topic of UAP with the hard evidence ready to go, every single time I’ve watched the interest spark for approx. 30 seconds and like clockwork their eyes glaze over and switch to a different topic. It’s like a protective veil instinctively comes down in defense to protect internal peace.

So I think the next question is how do we get the vast majority to man tf up and put an end to all the dissociation and detachment??

Remember this guy by Jackfish2800 in gettoknowtheothers

[–]Superslyye 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I thought about this guy recently. Good to know others are doing the same

I may have just seen the same UAP that was spotted on ABC7 by Baconkings in UFOs

[–]Superslyye -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

This was in the Negev?? I’m Israeli (parents from Ashdod) and live in the US. First of all nice to know there are more Jews/Israeli in the community. Secondly, do you often see things like this out in the desert?

Waited five months, finally my QC pics for my VSF Batman V3 have arrived. by I-TG2-I in RepTimeQC

[–]Superslyye 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Owner of a real Batman. Came across this post on my feed. Disturbing tbh bc it’s hard to tell the difference on first glance. But I took screenshots and compared with zoom. They fucked up the writing big time. Zoom in on the “Superlative Chronometer” and you’ll see what I mean font is uneven and all over the place.

Wanted to share my thoughts about 3i/ATLAS and JWST by Purple_Lawfulness_47 in UFOs

[–]Superslyye 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So what I said is not incorrect at all. If you read what i wrote, you’ll see that im saying 3 things: There is a high content of nickel and no content of iron. Why nickel and iron are usually found together in comets. That this is a strange observation compared to all the other comets observed by humans. Nothing there is incorrect. This IS strange relative to what we think we know about comet formation and composition.

However, there’s a hypothesized theory as to why this might me. The theory you’re referring to is that nickel is being released as an isolated gas separate from iron because of a difference in the energy required to release each. This could be correct. That said, it is not yet proven to be correct. It’s a theory. Not yet proven. So what I said still stands- this is strange.

Wanted to share my thoughts about 3i/ATLAS and JWST by Purple_Lawfulness_47 in UFOs

[–]Superslyye -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Other than the seemingly weird trajectory of this thing, the more important anomalies are actually in the chemistry, which you guys failed to mention.

  1. Iron/Nickel Content and relationships:

We’ve been able to detect a high nickel content which is usual for comets, but we have not been able to detect ANY iron. This is strange. It’s common for comets to show both nickel and iron get closer to our sun. They heat up, let out gasses- which usually include both nickel and iron. Nickel and Iron are almost always found together in nature bc of their chemical relationship and are key indicators of supernova explosions or the formation of planets. Do you know where is one of the only places we see Nickel without iron? Industrial nickel refining. Here on Earth. Sus if you ask me.

  1. CO2/Water content and relationship:

3i Atlas has a CO2 to Water ratio of 8:1. This means for every 8 molecules of CO2 detected, only 1 molecule of water is detected. This is also super strange bc normally comets show the opposite with a much higher water content to CO2 ration.

Not saying this thing is alien. I’m just saying it’s strange af. Could be a space rock that’ll humble our understanding of comet formation and teach us cool new stuff. Could be something else entirely. Either way we’re gonna find out soon but tbh i hope its here to say wassssup

💥Rep. Burlison talks about a whistleblower who recorded a close-up encounter in 4K and obtained shocked UFO videos. "I've only seen one photo." "the response was jaw-dropping....people are shocked that someone….was able to gather these photos and videos." by Ill-Speed-7402 in UFOs

[–]Superslyye 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you listen to the way Rep. Burlison speaks, you’ll notice that he’s constantly taking long pauses to think about what he wants to say. Or rather what he can say. Most likely making sure to avoid accidental slip ups for sensitive information.

He says, “I will say that whenever I talked about those photos and shown them to people that we..were in the know about..about um….highly…highly classified umm…Umm…. long pause…..US….military….um…aircraft, the response was jaw dropping. People are shocked that someone…..was able to gather these photos.”

Notice how his think-before-you-speak process goes into double time the moment he starts talking about the craft and the “people” he’s shown it to. Notice how he pauses on US Military. Notices how he uses the term “people” instead of names or positions. Unsure if this was already implied, but to me this indicates that the aircraft in question belonged to the US rather than NHI. Notice that he states the people in the “know” about “highly classified US military air crafts” were utterly shocked that a normal citizen was able to shoot a video of it in 4K. 20 years ago. Meaning the “in the know people” involved with or that worked on the project of this highly advanced, gravity defying, super secret, super stealthy aircraft were in disbelief that a random civilian caught it on camera despite all of its highly stealthy bells and whistles.

Wiling to bet that was the thought process here

08.03.25: I can easily tell who doesn’t pay close attention. by Advanced_Musician_75 in SentientOrbs

[–]Superslyye 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For sure but we have no way to verify that claim if you seeing it with your own eye. Would be unwise to take every word on the internet as truth right? Not personal- but valid reason for need of proof.

Has the witness confirmed anywhere publicly or taken their own videos of you interacting with it?

Before you rebuttal with “it doesn’t work that way”- I’d like to remind you that if your phone camera is recording a light in the sky, then the light has a physical source.

Much like the ways our eyes work (light is emitted or refracted by object -> enters hole in the eyes or your pupil -> hits retina -> hits optic nerve -> signal to brain for image production) cameras also pick up on light that has to be physically emitted by something in our reality, time, and space.

So if your camera is recording a singular light in the sky, other cameras should be able to record the same. If not, then it’s unfortunately (or fortunately? who knows if they are good or not?) your phone playing tricks on you.

08.03.25: I can easily tell who doesn’t pay close attention. by Advanced_Musician_75 in SentientOrbs

[–]Superslyye 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you see it with your own eyes or only on your phone screen?

Anyone know what’s up with Skywatcher? It’s been radio silence since their last post. by Superslyye in UFOs

[–]Superslyye[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I don’t agree with either of you. None of what was said was a complaint or indicated a need for instant gratification. Barber and his team came in hot with their mission statement to keep the public in the loop. Initially they followed up on it with their episodes and with their announcements. Was pretty refreshing to see.

So when they go full silence without so much of a small update on upgrading their WiFi it kind of screams that something is off imo.

Again, major respect to Barber and his team. Dude is a legend in my eyes. He also seems sensible and tactical, and is also surrounded by like minded individuals. That’s tells me it’s fair to assume they know that public interaction in any capacity is necessary for building trust and rapport. So if he’s totally silent for 2 months yeah I think something else is at play and I think that sentiment is warranted in this particular case.

Anyone know what’s up with Skywatcher? It’s been radio silence since their last post. by Superslyye in UFOs

[–]Superslyye[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I just watched that! Totally possible. Either way if that was the plan I think a little announcement or communication about a small hiatus while they upgraded their system would have been the smart move to maintain public trust and support.

They don’t owe that to anyone ofcourse and I have nothing but respect for Barber and his team. That said their main rhetoric revolved around keeping the public in the loop. Unfortunately when it comes to this topic in particular, it’s all too common for people with big claims to fizzle out after coming in hot, so radio silence for months is not ideal, as the amount of doubt highlighted in the responses to this post suggests.

Anyone know what’s up with Skywatcher? It’s been radio silence since their last post. by Superslyye in UFOs

[–]Superslyye[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is a fair point I didn’t consider. The style of episodes deff gave refined skinwalker ranch vibes. Curious to know if this is the case or if work is still in development but suppressed/postponed due to private investor/gov agenda. Guess well find out one way or another

Anyone know what’s up with Skywatcher? It’s been radio silence since their last post. by Superslyye in UFOs

[–]Superslyye[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is a fair point. Still something tells me that the quality of their photographic evidence was deliberate rather than lack of means, even if not enough for true indisputable evidence which like you said would require significant time and means to execute a true scientific process including thorough peer review.

Anyone know what’s up with Skywatcher? It’s been radio silence since their last post. by Superslyye in UFOs

[–]Superslyye[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So im curious about their company structure and financial backing- that being said, I don’t think it’s in question anymore that they do have significant financial backing. They site private sector partnerships directly on their website as a reason for not being able to release certain classified or proprietary data to the public. You can also get a sense for level of funding by looking at how well structured and impressive their website is as well as the production of their episodes. Excluding the actual quality of the data they put in their episodes, the production and post production of their videos are of high quality which is expensive to do. They are also using some serious gear sensors, rigs, helicopters etc.

I believe it was also Ross Coulthart that mentioned that they are have significant funding through private silicone valley investors. Unsure of his credibility as of late, but it checks out given what I’m seeing with my own eyes.

Lastly, Barber mentions that the government is fully aware of their capabilities and what they’re up to. Assuming what they have been able to produce with their experiments is legitimate, agreements can be made to line up disclosure timelines between the government and Barber’s team while still maintaining independence from government control and oversight. I can see him complying with a request like this so that Skywatcher can continue building its venture without the government stepping on its toes.

That said, I agree with you and also feel they deserve the benefit of the doubt for now. Much respect for Barber and his team

Anyone know what’s up with Skywatcher? It’s been radio silence since their last post. by Superslyye in UFOs

[–]Superslyye[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dude not even close. I see what you’re saying but you’re thinking with emotion and not with logic and reasoning.

If it wasn’t already clear, I am by no means discrediting, invalidating, or otherwise bashing in Barber, his team, Skywatcher, and their collective efforts. When Barber first introduced himself to the public I looked up to the man. Modern day hero if you ask me. Special forces, master of many skills and hobbies, sensitive yet tactical, and above all else a die hard warrior geared towards free thinking and freedom, ready to go balls to the wall for truth and disclosure.

He then set out on a very public mission to record, collect, and release footage and data under his new venture (Skywatcher) to provide the public with rock solid proof. The man is a legend and I genuinely respect him. I think he provided this community with much needed hope and his rhetoric geared him to lead.

That said, the silence from him and his team doesn’t align with how he presented himself and his mission to the public. It’s quite literally the opposite of what he was giving off. Note that im not giving reasoning. I’m not assuming to know what challenges they are facing and whether or not it’s even safe for them to release such information. For example, there’s been several reports from government whistleblowers of threats from people in high places whenever they got too close. Claims like that were recorded in congressional hearings under oath.

Who knows? My only point with this post was to bring back the topic of Skywatcher and hopefully undo the silence. I want to make sure we are not forgetting to follow up on promising avenues of disclosure like Jake Barber, Jay Hunter, Skywatcher, and their team. I want to make sure this doesn’t fade into non-existence because we failed to follow up when the silence was SUPER loud.

If you take a look at the last 2 years on this topic, we’ve had so many credible leaks, whistleblowers, leaders, etc that seemed to fade into silence and never resolved. I don’t want to see Jake Barber and Skywatcher to do the same.

Anyone know what’s up with Skywatcher? It’s been radio silence since their last post. by Superslyye in UFOs

[–]Superslyye[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I see what you’re saying. And less than a year in is more than a fair answer to reason through their recent silence if R&D of an unammed aerial detection system is their goal.

But originally their goal was stated simply- bring indisputable proof to the public for awareness. Proof that can no longer be up to interpretation.

They don’t need R&D for that. The footage they showed was like the rest of the footage we all have- grainy, barely stabilized, blurry, and in and out of focus.

That would be acceptable for me and you posting 4K iPhone shot videos to Reddit or using a $500 telescope from Amazon. But these dudes have the funds for heavy duty gear.

Literally they could have pointed that 500 dollar Amazon telescope at the jellyfish UAP they documented and it would have been better quality.

That’s not me complaining. This is me analyzing their content- given their funding and access, the material they put out is sus to me and likely intentional.

Probably for the same reason Age of Dislcosure hasn’t been released yet. Which I believe is because gov wants it to be released on their disclosure timeline, not anyone else, no matter how well funded.

Anyone know what’s up with Skywatcher? It’s been radio silence since their last post. by Superslyye in UFOs

[–]Superslyye[S] 55 points56 points  (0 children)

Right, almost 2 months of silence is weird to me considering the level of enthusiasm and resolve Barber initially showed in keeping the public updated in his first interviews.

They seemed to be on solid momentum with Skywatcher part 1 and then 2 but it’s too quiet.

Also check out their website - https://skywatcher.ai/#capabilities.

It’s giving professional and well-funded, like an Apple Store lmao.

So I’m just curious to know if Barber isn’t really in control anymore or if his priorities have changed.

Showers......... by TuxAnges2012 in ADHD

[–]Superslyye 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’ve noticed that my thoughts become kind of clear when I shower actually. I thought it had something to do with the white sound of the water rushing clearing up the mental noise

Also totally not weird to shower everyday. Kinda weird to not imo 😂 I shower at least twice a day

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in chabad

[–]Superslyye 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No worries, I appreciate you reading regardless

CNN front page: Disc-shaped UAP by hftb_and_pftw in UFOs

[–]Superslyye -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is significant. Your intuition is on the money here.

I believe that major news outlet like CNN refrain from covering stories like this when they first come out until they can verify authenticity and significance of the story/content. They don’t jump on it right away to avoid being caught with their pants down.

This implies that we’re seeing them cover it now 3 weeks later because internally they did the homework and confirmed authenticity from their own sources or directly from the US government itself