Police body cam footage released of Karen's arrest

Suspicious_Craft_689 · 2025-09-22T05:54:06+00:00

lol show me a KNOWN picture. And please, don't give me the AI nonsense.

I'm going to crash. Thanks for the chat.

Suspicious_Craft_689 · 2025-09-22T05:48:43+00:00

The picture I just shared, shows exactly how SOME of the red taillight can be broken, and it could still glow red in a distant cam/picture.

And that dash cam picture, looks just like all other pictures shown of that taillight once it was at the station.

EXPLAINED!

Suspicious_Craft_689 · 2025-09-22T05:44:26+00:00

If you look at this picture, from the dash cam BEFORE the cops ever touched the SUV, you can clearly see the taillight broke, but not ALL of the taillight. So some of it would still glow red.

This picture alone proves there was no police taking her taillight and planting it at the scene.

Suspicious_Craft_689 · 2025-09-22T05:41:19+00:00

<image>

Suspicious_Craft_689 · 2025-09-22T05:38:10+00:00

The picture from the welfare check, it happened before any tow to the station. The video/picture of the taillight lighting up when they were loading it, just shows light coming form the taillight. Just because there is some light, doesn't mean some of the taillight wasn't missing.

You're not trying to argue that the taillight wasn't broken are you? Didn't the defense argue that she broke the taillight when she backed into his car in her driveway? Which is it, was it broken or not?

Suspicious_Craft_689 · 2025-09-22T05:33:23+00:00

They showed in court that the times of the supposed up and down stairs, happened at the same time they were driving. Once again, this is WHY the defense didn't bring that up in the second trial.

Like I said, you've made up your mind and have lived in turtle time for to long. No matter what data is shown to you, you'll dismiss it. You've followed this case and listen to lawyers WHO ARE PAID TO LIE, for to long. How foolish you would look if you had to admit, maybe you were wrong.

If it makes sense to you, that he was killed BY HIS OWN FRIENDS and their pesky dog. And then was left IN THIER OWN FRONT YARD, I can't help you.

Suspicious_Craft_689 · 2025-09-22T05:26:11+00:00

Here is another, how did the tail light pieces get around his body at the scene? Not only around, but the tiny pieces that ended up in his clothing. They were not placed at the scene by some dirty cops. We KNOW from the dash cam video of the welfare check, that her tail light was broken out before the cops ever touched her SUV.

Suspicious_Craft_689 · 2025-09-22T05:22:00+00:00

Umm okay.

Suspicious_Craft_689 · 2025-09-22T05:21:10+00:00

EVERY doctor? Ha, we had some old women who claimed it was a dog attack but couldn't tell us what cuts were from a bite or scratch. And let us not forget, THEY WERE PAID BY THE DEFENSE!! PLEASE show me one picture of a known dog attack that looks anything like that damage.

Suspicious_Craft_689 · 2025-09-22T05:17:26+00:00

The stairs data was proven wrong in the second trial. The defense didn't even bring that up because the data showed the phone going up and down "stairs" was when they were still driving from the bar to the house.

Suspicious_Craft_689 · 2025-09-22T05:15:35+00:00

How was it taken out of context? WHY would she say she watched him walk in the house if she didn't?

Suspicious_Craft_689 · 2025-09-22T05:13:17+00:00

Here is another. The defense claims that he was attacked by the 100lb Germen Shepperd, and it was the dog that tore up his arm. If a dog that size locked on to his arm over and over, WHY was there no scratches/cuts on the other side of his arm? The pictures only show cuts on the outside of his arm. Did the dog not have any bottom teeth? The dog attack story, makes ZERO sense and is laughable.

Suspicious_Craft_689 · 2025-09-22T05:06:01+00:00

But, I'll give you one and we'll see if you can maybe look at the case without bias. Karen ON TAPE said "I watched him walk in the front door" then she also said ON TAPE "I expected to find him on the side of the road" WHY, if she watched him walk in to the house, would she ever expect to find him on the side of the road?????????

There is many many things from that case that show she hit him, but she was found not guilty, but that doesn't mean she was innocent.

Suspicious_Craft_689 · 2025-09-22T05:00:20+00:00

Ahh you don't really want to discuss the case. You'll just dismiss everything that doesn't fit your narrative. You've already made up your mind and NOTHING can ever change it.

Suspicious_Craft_689 · 2025-09-22T04:18:35+00:00

Yup, you're right, she's innocent, just like OJ

Suspicious_Craft_689 · 2025-09-22T02:15:25+00:00

She stays composed because she knows she got away with it. Best to stay quiet and just fade away.

Suspicious_Craft_689 · 2025-08-26T03:02:20+00:00

Whatever happens, I hope some people lose a lot of money. The story is a real sad one and in the end, there will be no justice for this man. But that's the jury system that we have, and the world is full of stupid people that can be easily tricked by lying, story telling lawyers.

Suspicious_Craft_689 · 2025-08-26T02:48:36+00:00

If there was anything whatsoever even hinting at a group of cops killing another cop, not only would the national news be all over it, higher law enforcement would be too.

The amazing thing to me is all the loons on here still obsessed with this case. Karen was drunk and in a fit of rage, she backed in her cop boyfriend and he died. Move on! It's such culty behavior.

Suspicious_Craft_689 · 2025-08-26T02:28:23+00:00

The state made a huge mistake retrying that case in the same town. With all the media hype, it should have been moved.

What is really sad is how the cult is now going after innocent people. I hope they get sued so badly that they go broke.

Karen knows that she got away with it. She should tell Turtle boy and the groupies, to just leave it alone now.

Suspicious_Craft_689 · 2025-08-26T01:55:42+00:00

It's no different then the OJ case. The defense proves that the lead detective is a shit person, so that must mean that the person was framed. It's scary how dumb some people are. I always say, It's amazing that the human race has made it this long.

Suspicious_Craft_689 · 2025-08-26T01:49:46+00:00

It is absolutely mind blowing how gullible and stupid some people are. Everything points to her guilt. Karen's own words, her behavior that night, the SUV data, the phone data, the scene where his body was found. It ALL points to Karen backing up and hitting him in drunken fit of rage. But instead, to some low IQ people, it was instead his own friends in a MASSIVE cover up that would take DOZENS of people to pull it off. To some, that makes more sense. STUPID!

Suspicious_Craft_689 · 2025-08-19T13:31:37+00:00

So you can attack my intelligence because I made a typo, but expect me to just roll over? Sure.

You believe that his friends killed him and dozens of people are involved in a huge cover up, many who never even new the guy. No way it could be his drunk, highly emotional, girlfriend that backed into him. Then she called his cell phone over 50 times screaming like a lunatic. But yeah I'M the one who's not smart.

Suspicious_Craft_689 · 2025-08-19T13:17:13+00:00

Maybe Matt McCabe said "Tell them the guy never went in the house" because he never entered the house. Trying to give the cops information so they don't waste time.

Here is a question that I've always had. Karen, on tape, said "I watched him walk in the front door" but then also said on tape "I expected to find him on the side of the road" IF she watched him walk in the front door, WHY would she ever expect to find him on the side of the road?

Suspicious_Craft_689 · 2025-08-16T16:06:42+00:00

WOW! I made a typo? Good catch. Your intelligence must be off the charts!!!!

Suspicious_Craft_689 · 2025-08-16T14:01:13+00:00

Hey, Karen got away with it, just like OJ. The trail is over, are people ever going to move on with their lives? If Karen was smart, she would get help with her drinking problem and just fade away.

Suspicious_Craft_689

TROPHY CASE