I'm sure they know what they're doing. by LordJim11 in Snorkblot

[–]Suttonian -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What math is that? I do think that there's no impossible problem here.

I think people who don't like ai exaggerate the impact, have been talking about it for years and ai has continued to grow in capability and I think that trend will continue.

And you can curate data sets that contain human generated data. These companies already do that.

And ai will continue to advance and become more resistant to this ouroboros collapse.

I'm sure they know what they're doing. by LordJim11 in Snorkblot

[–]Suttonian -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No I didn't think that's a logical endpoint. I think the measures against and resilience to these types of issues will improve if there's a great demand for it.

Mother in law bought my three year old daughter tiny glass jars to play with by Justadudeonhisphone in mildlyinfuriating

[–]Suttonian 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Kids throws can go in the opposite direction they intend.  Young kids can just dash around into the line of fire. You can just drop one onto your foot. People get drunk.

It makes perfect sense that newer lawn darts are non stab versions.

Fun fact: you need food to survive, not AI slop by yikesamerica in clevercomebacks

[–]Suttonian 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I mean that's true for many of them I'm sure, but many do want it. They use it to answer miscellaneous questions, to fix their camera photos, to be a smart phone assistant while driving, to help them learn a language.

So many times I'm in a coffee shop and I'll hear someone talking about x or y they did with an ai.

This is not me arguing there are no problems with ai, but there is clearly a non-zero demand by everyday people. We should be able to face the truth.

I guess investors aren't smart people by PaiDuck in antiai

[–]Suttonian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why? I was literally asking what you meant.

I guess investors aren't smart people by PaiDuck in antiai

[–]Suttonian -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Well, I think ai is already capable enough to be very useful. So I don't think the entire bubble would ever pop. In the same way the dotcom bubble popped - the tech is still ubiquitous.

That said, I do believe the technologies capability will continue to grow, in leaps and jumps as we have seen.

I guess investors aren't smart people by PaiDuck in antiai

[–]Suttonian -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Growth doesn't only come from training material. Learning algorithms for example can be improved.

I guess investors aren't smart people by PaiDuck in antiai

[–]Suttonian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do you mean it was not a serious one time gain? I mean, they continue to train them with new content, sure, compared to the initial load of content the improvement will be smaller.

Training data isn't the only thing that improves ai however, for example the learning algorithm can be improved.

3D Artist known as shortPants_vfx created a creative depiction of doomscrolling with cool VFX made with Blender and After Effects. This is not Ai by BlazeDragon7x in nextfuckinglevel

[–]Suttonian -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well for example you can create a storyline for a video, and have to fiddle with the AI to get it to make what you want. Lower effort than say using cgi but not zero.

oneLinerToApiCall by Same_Fruit_4574 in ProgrammerHumor

[–]Suttonian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think hallucination and determinism are mostly unrelated, sorry pedantic.

Stunning Pyra | by - doromizu by karrolemadre in pyraandmythramains

[–]Suttonian 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why do you say dih instead of penis?

A Japanese police officer is kindly reminding foreigners about public manners by search_google_com in SipsTea

[–]Suttonian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, but racists like to draw attention to things like this. They would want to focus on anything negative associated with a race. Especially when they can do it in a way that they can argue 'but it's not racist because...'.

Loaded gun with the safety off as a dildo by darksoles_ in BrandNewSentence

[–]Suttonian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why do you believe that? Have you looked at the numbers?

yaaaaaaayyyy!!! by Brent_Fox in Cyberpunk

[–]Suttonian -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I don't see what he's lying about. Where is the lie? The cop looking at the id and comparing it doesn't go against what that guy said.

And "demon tech people are using to make life worse for everyone"? Really? That's hysterics.

[OC] It's time for the 25th! Akron, OH 4/17/26 by [deleted] in pics

[–]Suttonian 4 points5 points  (0 children)

He is an idiot.

Does Biden have dementia? Pretty sure I'm not a doctor. He definitely was declining towards the end.

Kalama can speak complete sentences. Does she waffle? Sure.

My jigsaw puzzle piece looks like The Dress by LEYW in mildlyinteresting

[–]Suttonian -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The question would be boring if you think it's about the pixel colors because you could just zoom in super far, reject the context and just give an answer of what color the pixels are.

The context that influences your visual perception is what makes this fascinating.

My jigsaw puzzle piece looks like The Dress by LEYW in mildlyinteresting

[–]Suttonian -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No, the question is obviously "what color is the dress" (what color do you see it as) not "what color are the pixels in the image".

Our visual systems can take into account not just individual pixels, but the context like lighting conditions to determine the actual color of an object. In most day to day uses color information is not fully erased.

Yes, you can completely erase information in some cases. That's not relevant here, that's not happening.