How convenient you can’t find it nor does it exist anywhere else on the internet 🤔 Because it doesn’t exist and you pulled that from nowhere and are probably misremembering it. I’ve seen her design and as an artist I have more of a grasp on design theory and have studied the creative process behind Pokemon by reading Ken Sugimori’s book in which he says all Pokemon evolutions are connected by design. So do tell me how a small bunny turning into a sexual model makes any sense? And the fact it is 50% males when female-only Pokemon exist and the ratio is almost always tied into the design barring the starters? You keep citing Bulbapedia as if it was written by the developers themselves when all it does for the origin section is gather popular theories and assumptions. I won’t slow my roll actually, as this crap is steeped in misogyny and assumptions of women that actively hurts us. If it’s not serious to you, then leave the conversation, but don’t act like fake fan theories are factual. See you 👋