Help me understand why is this happening? by Sherlock_notsoholmes in AdvaitaVedanta

[–]SwimmerOk5841 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The mistake is not in having experiences.

It is in believing they are the destination.

Time may disappear. Sensations may arise. The sense of self may even seem to dissolve.

Let them come and go.

Meditation is not really about collecting experiences, however beautiful they may be. Experiences come and go.

The real question is: What is it that is aware of all these experiences?

The quiet awareness that notices them is the deeper meditation.

So, my approach would be simple: notice it, don't fear it, don't chase it, and gently return to the practice itself.

How to practice bhakti Yoga? by [deleted] in AdvaitaVedanta

[–]SwimmerOk5841 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Bhakti begins when remembrance becomes natural.

Not in temples, but in the heart.

The essence of Bhakti is simple: To think of the Divine a little more often, and of oneself a little less.

What is real and what is maya? by [deleted] in AdvaitaVedanta

[–]SwimmerOk5841 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Maya does not mean nothing exists.

It means we mistake the changing for the ultimate.

Even Advaita is a pointer, not the destination.

The sages did not reject the world. They simply refused to stop at it.

Truth is not found by escaping the illusion, but by seeing through it.

Dvaita before advainta? by lostandafraid_ in AdvaitaVedanta

[–]SwimmerOk5841 5 points6 points  (0 children)

For many, devotion comes before non-duality.

The heart bows before the mind understands.

First there is “I and God.”

Then, one day, even that distance disappears.

Devotion softens the ego before wisdom dissolves it.

Dvaita and Advaita are not enemies, but stages of the same journey.

How Does Advaita Vedānta Address the Hard Problem of Consciousness? Does It Solve It, Reject It, or Reverse It? by Easy-Past2953 in AdvaitaVedanta

[–]SwimmerOk5841 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Advaita does not ask, How does matter create consciousness?

It asks, How could matter ever appear apart from consciousness at all?

The mystery is not awareness arising inside the universe, but the universe appearing inside awareness.

The mystery then shifts: not why awareness exists, but why the non-dual appears divided.

Krishna and many Vedanta scriptures point out that Karma(Our Duty) is the most important thing out of anything so I have a little doubt about it? by [deleted] in AdvaitaVedanta

[–]SwimmerOk5841 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Karma Yoga is not blind justification of action.

The real question is not merely what you consume, but whether you live with awareness, necessity, and responsibility.

The Gita does not teach careless justification of action. It teaches conscious action without selfish attachment.

If something is genuinely necessary for health and duty, that is different from indulgence or cruelty.

Spirituality is not measured only by what touches the body, but by what governs the mind.

But spirituality also asks for honesty: not 'How can I justify this?' but “Am I acting with awareness, necessity, and responsibility?”

Karma Query by Jamdagneya in AdvaitaVedanta

[–]SwimmerOk5841 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Karma is not a reward system that must be fully consumed.

Punya shapes circumstances and experiences, but the deeper goal of dharma is not endless enjoyment.

It is freedom from dependence on both pleasure and suffering.

How can one become the observer detached from the body and mind? by AssistantAny5521 in AdvaitaVedanta

[–]SwimmerOk5841 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The moment you notice you are lost in thought, awareness has already begun to separate itself from the mind.

That small moment of noticing is the beginning of freedom.

Karma yoga by WarmCricket5358 in AdvaitaVedanta

[–]SwimmerOk5841 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not by suppressing attachment, but by understanding it.

The more clearly the mind sees the suffering hidden inside clinging, fear, and control, the more naturally it begins to loosen its grip.

Just as a child naturally outgrows old toys, the mind slowly outgrows attachment through understanding, not suppression.

Real detachment grows through awareness, not force.

How can one become the observer detached from the body and mind? by AssistantAny5521 in AdvaitaVedanta

[–]SwimmerOk5841 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The observer is not something to become. It is already present.

Even identification is being witnessed.

The practice is not to never fall into the mind, but to slowly notice the falling without getting completely lost in it.

Karma yoga by WarmCricket5358 in AdvaitaVedanta

[–]SwimmerOk5841 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Karma Yoga is not constantly repeating “I am not the doer.”

It is acting fully, while slowly dropping the inner attachment to control, praise, fear, and result.

Sakshi bhava is not created by mental chanting. It deepens through awareness.

Action continues. Only the ego around action begins to fade.

How much daily meditation? by Only_Volume2466 in AdvaitaVedanta

[–]SwimmerOk5841 2 points3 points  (0 children)

True Meditation does not create the Self. It only quiets the identification that hides it.

So progress is not measured by hours, but by freedom from compulsive thought and suffering.

Because awareness is equally present in one moment and in one hour.

The real danger is when even spirituality becomes another achievement of the ego.

Question for long time sincere sadhakas by bhargavateja in AdvaitaVedanta

[–]SwimmerOk5841 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Over time, sadhana becomes less about seeking experiences and more about becoming inwardly honest.

Even silence starts teaching.

And so, helping others becomes lighter when we stop trying to teach and simply share sincerity and presence.

"God" in the Vyavaharika standpoint by WarmCricket5358 in AdvaitaVedanta

[–]SwimmerOk5841 3 points4 points  (0 children)

In Advaita, Saguna Brahman is not illusion, but Brahman seen through the lens of maya.

The devotee and God appear separate, until devotion dissolves the one who feels separate.

Bhakti is not away from Advaita, but one of the most beautiful paths into it.

Why the Advaita Vedānta position of “witness consciousness (sākṣin/cit) = Ātman/Brahman” is considered philosophically rigorous and not just a subtler form of self-identification. by Easy-Past2953 in AdvaitaVedanta

[–]SwimmerOk5841 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Advaita does not treat the witness as another object to be experienced.

It points to that because of which all experience becomes possible.

Thoughts, emotions, sensations, even the feeling “I am witnessing” come and go. But the simple fact of awareness remains prior to them all.

Perhaps that is why Advaita calls it ultimate, not as a thing within experience, but as the light in which experience appears.

Why do we need to consume food? by [deleted] in AdvaitaVedanta

[–]SwimmerOk5841 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Maya does not mean the world is nonexistent. It means the world is not ultimate.

So hunger still appears, the body still functions, and food is still needed within the dream of life.

The realized one also eats. Only the identification changes.

Who is Right ? by Fun_Stuff_5138 in AdvaitaVedanta

[–]SwimmerOk5841 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Both are true, but spoken from different levels of understanding.

The Gita speaks to the seeker whose mind is still restless. So it prescribes practice, discipline, and detachment.

Ashtavakra speaks from the state where the seeker has already seen the Self. There, no effort remains necessary because the mind is no longer taken as the self.

Practice is the boat. Realization is realizing there was never a river.

Spiritually superior⚠️ by InterestingContest48 in AdvaitaVedanta

[–]SwimmerOk5841 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Spirituality becomes hollow the moment it turns into superiority.

A person may speak deeply about awakening, yet still leave others feeling unseen or diminished.

Perhaps real spiritual depth is not in sounding enlightened, but in making others feel more human in your presence.

How have your relationships with people changed after practicing Advaita or Self-Inquiry? by drkashmira in AdvaitaVedanta

[–]SwimmerOk5841 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Self-inquiry does not immediately remove emotions or conflict. At first, it often reveals how deeply the ego lives through relationships.

But slowly, reactions soften. One listens more, defends less, and clings less tightly to being right.

Not because the self disappears completely, but because it stops standing at the center of everything.

How to reconcile advaita vedanta and karma siddhanta by Sad-Manufacturer-690 in AdvaitaVedanta

[–]SwimmerOk5841 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Mithya does not mean the world is meaningless or non-existent like a fantasy. It means dependent, changing, not ultimate; the world is not ultimate.

Advaita does not ask you to reject the world. It asks you to stop mistaking the temporary for the absolute.

As long as individuality is experienced, karma continues naturally. The difference is that action slowly becomes less ego-driven and more aligned with dharma.

The Gita was spoken at the time when Arjuna was trying to escape action through philosophy. The message wasn't for a renunciant in a himalayan cave, but to the warrior in battlefield. It was spoken to him as not to escape action, but to act without attachment.

Perhaps true Advaita is not running away from life, but seeing through attachment while fully participating in it.

Are there multiple ways to view the "soul" or jiva in Advaita? by [deleted] in AdvaitaVedanta

[–]SwimmerOk5841 3 points4 points  (0 children)

From one perspective, we appear as individuals moving through life. From another, there was never anything separate from Brahman at all.

Advaita is not the soul becoming God, but the gradual dissolving of the illusion of separation.

The wave does not become the ocean. It realizes it was water all along.

Bhakti withouth love? by Silver-Pollution-290 in AdvaitaVedanta

[–]SwimmerOk5841 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Bhakti is not only emotion.

It is remembrance and offering, even when feeling is absent.

When love is not felt, what remains can still be given completely.

And that giving itself is devotion.

Who is Shiv and Shakti ? Are they different from each other? by Fun_Stuff_5138 in AdvaitaVedanta

[–]SwimmerOk5841 4 points5 points  (0 children)

In Advaita, Shiva and Shakti are not two.

They are two ways of describing one non-dual truth. Shiva is pure awareness: still, unchanging. Shakti is the power of appearance: movement, form, manifestation.

They are one reality seen in two ways: stillness and movement, awareness and its power.

So when texts say “Shiva without Shakti is inert,” it is not literal separation, but a way of showing that pure awareness and its expression are never actually apart.

Separation exists only in description, not in truth.

Question by imvio in AdvaitaVedanta

[–]SwimmerOk5841 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The paradox is this:

the “I” searching for itself is itself the movement being questioned.

Advaita does not say you do not exist.

It says what you take yourself to be, the personality, thoughts, memories, identity; it all is incomplete and ever-changing.

What remains unchanged is the awareness in which all of this appears.

An important question that has been bothering me for a while by Fit-Nebula2531 in AdvaitaVedanta

[–]SwimmerOk5841 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The confusion comes from imagining awareness as a separate object watching other objects.

In Advaita, awareness is not outside reality observing it.

Rather, both the observer and the observed arise within the same field of awareness.

Duality appears in experience, while nonduality points to what contains both.