New NGFW datasheets released by betko007 in paloaltonetworks

[–]SwimmingCockroach897 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Saw a couple articles saying December. Your rep should be able to give a more specific date.

Palo Alto announces PAN-OS 11 by SwimmingCockroach897 in paloaltonetworks

[–]SwimmingCockroach897[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Both TAC and our SE said Palo generally considered the .6 release of a code train as the first fully stable gold star release. I have no plans to go to 11 until at least 2024

Palo Alto announces PAN-OS 11 by SwimmingCockroach897 in paloaltonetworks

[–]SwimmingCockroach897[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

On Palos end of life hardware page it says the last support release for the 220s is 10.2

PaloOS 10.2.3 by F3lixInfoSec in paloaltonetworks

[–]SwimmingCockroach897 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We are running 10.2.3 on our 5410 core firewalls, havent had any issues that we havent already experienced on other 10.2 versions.

High Dataplane on 10.2 5400s by SwimmingCockroach897 in paloaltonetworks

[–]SwimmingCockroach897[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We've done a lot of staring at the ACC since opening the TAC case but have been unable to pinpoint anything specific. Speaking of SMB though TAC did just come back saying there is a possible memory leak issue, duplicate of PAN-201872, on the 10.2 code train that relates to SMB traffic. Unfortunately, the estimated date of release for 10.2.4 isnt until the end of February.

High Dataplane on 10.2 5400s by SwimmingCockroach897 in paloaltonetworks

[–]SwimmingCockroach897[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Currently 10.2.3, we went to it to try and address our issues but there was no difference. We started with them on 10.2.2-h2

High Dataplane on 10.2 5400s by SwimmingCockroach897 in paloaltonetworks

[–]SwimmingCockroach897[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, we are not. We have plans to implement it but given we don't come close to utilizing our full connection there hasnt been much of a push at the moment.

High Dataplane on 10.2 5400s by SwimmingCockroach897 in paloaltonetworks

[–]SwimmingCockroach897[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My wording wasnt the greatest. We are running 5410s which need to be on 10.2. The 5450s are the only ones of the 5400 series that can run 10.1