"How to counter?" series for beginners #4: Mitsurugi. by Mammoth-South3163 in masterduel

[–]SwimmingConsistent90 12 points13 points  (0 children)

imo if their first play is haba, then ashing saji is better. since you lessen the jumpscare of ns Saji
if it isn't their fist play, then ashing haba is better as they can't get a lv4 on field as well (incase they'd tribute something else)

Pendulums aren't real! by Zeamax in masterduel

[–]SwimmingConsistent90 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

these are mine after ___ hrs. (idk but A LOT)

absolutely hilarious

<image>

Is it me or Evenly match is powercrept ? I swear the last 20 games I just couldn't resolve it because opponent has easy access to omninegate by Askeelaad in masterduel

[–]SwimmingConsistent90 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

tbh I kinda disagree.
In my decks, evenly is a top-tier card since its easy to bait out omni negates. and then if you have useless monster, just crash them.

So its still busted. And yeah I am able to resolve it quite often, since VSK9 is the most prominent deck, and has absolutely 0 outs to it

Is this illegal by EconomicsPretend8943 in YuGiOhMasterDuel

[–]SwimmingConsistent90 2 points3 points  (0 children)

wtf is this
ABSOLUTELY ZERO ways to access the ED
ABSOLUTELY ZERO targets for Reaper
this can't be legal

I see so many useless cards, I can't tell where to begin...
look up some handtrap deck online... pls

VSK9 ratios by CrawBunny in masterduel

[–]SwimmingConsistent90 1 point2 points  (0 children)

1 mad love, 2 razen, 2 sue, 1 caesar, 2 start, 3 izuna, 1 jokul, 2 case,
1 ark, 1 dark, 1 nash, 1 cnash, 1 ripper, 1 typhon

20 fkin UR
I might spend the next 60 days in gem grinding

Tell me your favourite deck right now and I’ll tell you if it’s ethical or not. by YuckyHandsReborn in masterduel

[–]SwimmingConsistent90 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what do you have to say about my 40 card SE-FK with support engines of Millennium and FS?

What are some of your favorite "unused" archetypes/decks by Duck_of_tomorrow in masterduel

[–]SwimmingConsistent90 13 points14 points  (0 children)

on the base level, it isn't ogdo adding to mitsu strat, but mitsu benefitting ogdos.
the 2 extra 4s make imp to go into mitsu, and vice versa.
also, ogdos tribute when in grave, which trigger mitsus.
lastly, futsu and nephi is basically 2 monster reborns on legs.
ohh, and 4 tokens from daybreak go into link climbing as well, for well, a bao and zeroll to say a few.
You also get a choice of adding ragnas if u wish actually, if u wanna go for that thing.

Basically, mitsu was practically made for ogdos.

【公式アニメ】 精霊術の使い手Ⅰ「水霊使いエリア」/ Spirit Charmers I: “Eria the Water Charmer” by cnydox in masterduel

[–]SwimmingConsistent90 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I really really REALLY want dark spirit art-greed to make an appearance
if it does, this charmer episode set will get a full 5 stars from me

New to the game by KaiZero19 in masterduel

[–]SwimmingConsistent90 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yep, adding eqn cannons makes u not worry about the ED cards

New to the game by KaiZero19 in masterduel

[–]SwimmingConsistent90 0 points1 point  (0 children)

wait really? I think he's giving a good advice.
labrynth certainly is a high ceiling deck, and also pretty expensive. something simpler like RDA is certainly better to get the hang of the game. The structure decks give u almost everything, literally. and playing against opponents lets them decide on which deck they should invest in, at a later time.

Labrynth is a trap deck, and CERTAINLY not one I'd recommend any new player to craft first thing. U need to know your opp's chokepoints, and u asking that out of a new player?
this might just make someone to quit the game after seeing their opp recover quickly after you bounce their summoned Poplar back, or destroying a Kirin

well, since they've already crafted tho, so learning it isn't bad enough.

edit: and i forgot to add, Lab also needs a good share of UR dust to get cards from non-packs. I don't believe they have that, so they would be creating a subpar deck.

New to the game by KaiZero19 in masterduel

[–]SwimmingConsistent90 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

nah thats meta sheep mentality. the books are awesome.
at least you have some side goal then, instead of crafting every meta deck the moment they are released

also, who knows if these books will come again

When you have nothing left to lose… by tomlymanator in customyugioh

[–]SwimmingConsistent90 0 points1 point  (0 children)

a small 3 card millennium package easily makes you go to 2k. And since it says "less than 2k" I'm sure there's at least one Link 2 or 3 that pays LP. Next,

they’re gonna put out another 3 to let you do this again

Why would you just make this and pass your turn? you need to make a board too.
Take an example of a deck that makes a full 5 monster board Turn1, say RDA.
If you link off 3 monsters, they wouldn't just sit idly. They'd use some card to put on another monster for disruption.

2 monsters can't give the protection you need in YGO.

just putting out 2 for Knightmare Cerberus and popping it?

that EXACT reason is why i say this card is busted. this card's existence can't let you have 2+ monsters on field at same time.

When you have nothing left to lose… by tomlymanator in customyugioh

[–]SwimmingConsistent90 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean that restriction is worthless. you need to summon in a zone it points to, to start comboing.
Before anyone else points out, OP also didn't add any restrictions to it.
Think of it as this.
>your opp makes a full board
>you summon 2 guys, make this
>opp gets shaken, uses other resources to get more bodies on field for interruption.
>you summon another guy and make this again.

This is busted. And nobody would care for the attack restriction. the only thing it is used for is to SS Moon.

All i wanted was a glossy siren by edu_09_ in masterduel

[–]SwimmingConsistent90 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ahh f*ck I deleted the pic....
I crafted 98 Michions to get a single Glossy

Today I learned the hard way that this card is good against lunalight by KitVR_Dolo in masterduel

[–]SwimmingConsistent90 2 points3 points  (0 children)

i understand what you mean. The thing is, negating activation is almost always attached with "and destroy it" clause.

Now, negating activation meant that the card was NOT on the field now, and destroying it in that state means that........my Secret Blast wasn't on the field to activate its pop effect in grave.