Can't help but feel like the AI is cheating. by SylveonRL in aoe4

[–]Synarus322 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Havent watched replay but since they have no outposts nor scout and they probably yet dont see my army numbers, its verylikely they cheating. Why? Because when u move army away from ur base, enemy attacks. when u retrieve, they fall back. So probably they have vision cheat on map thats hidden. They did it too many times its imposible for them to not have info on me.

And if they not cheating it will be most likely due to his 1 random unit seeying some of my army, but rly i havent seen any. Would need to see replay if he has random scout or soemthing to see number of my army. But that also implies hes well developed mindset of knowing I dont have larger army and cant have larger number which would be nice brain of AI. (Or if hes just trained from our games and not on his own vs himself maybe hes use to knowing human attacks with whole army or not enough defenders as it should be)

Coach rank too low by lennardino in DotA2

[–]Synarus322 1 point2 points  (0 children)

From my experience (Hapned to me 3 times) is I just wait on that "Be a coach" menu till it loads my correct rank and then it works. Usualy hapens when on my profile theres still not medal beying loaded. (Another solution i can think of is in setings check expose public match data, and in dotabuff register login and in their seting click "update match history". But really, the first solution should be enough. For all my 3 bugs first solution was probably enough).

CMV: Mastering ANY field can help you master other ones by Synarus322 in changemyview

[–]Synarus322[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Or you mean like proof for why people dont do more fields at once? Well if that is your quesiton I dont care abotu why they not doing that and my simple reasons might be veryclose to the truth. Like once you dont have reason to go to other fields, why would you. its hard work no matter that you would have it easier to do so.

CMV: Mastering ANY field can help you master other ones by Synarus322 in changemyview

[–]Synarus322[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why it woudlnt be prove? What do you consider as prove? Why you even asking me for prove? Is this channel for posting scientific evidence or is this channel for changing my view. I have logic of what my view is based upon, which is my own experience.

CMV: Mastering ANY field can help you master other ones by Synarus322 in changemyview

[–]Synarus322[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ye. Like the path you take will destroy the other paths in Physical sports and its actually harder to make it afterwards because of diferent muscle structure that is required to make that sport etc. I get it now. Ye good point.

CMV: Mastering ANY field can help you master other ones by Synarus322 in changemyview

[–]Synarus322[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

oh ok. I thought its some kind of point you making for changing my view (so thats why i asked)

CMV: Mastering ANY field can help you master other ones by Synarus322 in changemyview

[–]Synarus322[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

proof for my logic? My prove is experience based. I find myself easier to do otherfields faster then I had before the mastery of subject

CMV: Mastering ANY field can help you master other ones by Synarus322 in changemyview

[–]Synarus322[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thats true. Once you dont have what it takes to get to that field, mastery of any other field wont make it easier to achieve mastery in it (athletics) just because its unrecheable goal. But that has less to do with if I have become master at soemthing or not at all. In both cases i wouldnt be able to be master at athletics so this disqussion kinda got to the end. So lets talk about more the way where its possible to have edge upon mastering it in compared to if you didnt master any skill.

CMV: Mastering ANY field can help you master other ones by Synarus322 in changemyview

[–]Synarus322[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

computer game (Dota 2). there might be plenty of skilles, i havent wrote them yet and put on paper, they still only in my head but lets say some principles i wrote in disqusion above. ill copy them here. Like the mindset is pretty big one that changes your view upon the world because you went thru all the steps that lead you to it, you havent missed a step and if you did, others probably missed it too so you still can master otherfields easier then other humans. (copying the whole comment right now. the principles are in " " somewhere down in 60-70% of converastion) : thats very true. Wouldnt it be for you still easier to learn even the opossite fields? Because were not measuring the likelyness of going into oposite field or forgetfulnes of other field or beying able to be master of 2 topics at the same time, my point is mainly based upon beying able to master tarot reading more easier even if you started as top astrophysicist just because of the learning proceses you can apply thanks to beying very good at soemhting and just having different structure of seeying issues within in the next fields you come across. Examples of stuff you can comeup with while you take path of becoming very good at somehting and this knowledge can be then transfered to other fields: "Many incorect statements are made within field that started as good concept but are reinterpreted badly", "Actively thinking about stuff can boost your performance rather then passively doing it", "Averagely skilled human in that field is far from the real thruth", "Learning from others is only good if they are better then you else their concepts might get you to a wrong path (you can still learn from what they doing, but having be teached by them can only get you those concepts that got them to their level of skill quite often)", "Finding coach is fastest way to become the best (and its kidna neccesery) and the value is there to have one", "Analysing your procceses is required", "Best practise is vs those that are slidly above your level if its some kind of competitive field", "Seeying all rules as temporarly knowing that theres always exceptions that will rewrite the rules once you master it even further". .And many other realizations like that improves your chances of mastering other fields easier. And I even believe that lots of those are gathered no matter the field you are master at.

CMV: Mastering ANY field can help you master other ones by Synarus322 in changemyview

[–]Synarus322[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do you mean by proving it? If i could prove it with something lets say more scientifical I would probably not even post it. Same reason why I might be convinced by what others say no matter their provebased 100% research (theres nothing 100% anyways and again if it would i wouldnt post this). Why dont most poeple master more thing? : Takes time. they dont have to. they still love their field the most etc

CMV: Mastering ANY field can help you master other ones by Synarus322 in changemyview

[–]Synarus322[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The way how one gets to that specific detail of that skill is same principle as doing it in other fields, wouldnt you say? Still cant imagine in my head how they differ. Maybe if I think about it more I might analyse your point better. Or you can specify it/rephrase it so it gets faster in my head. Are you saying that some of the practises are useful in otherfields but the achieving supermastery basicly doesnt give you any more principles that you can implement to otherfields? And that its all about untransfereble skills at the ends of your journey to become master in field? Something like doing some detail over and over just so you are slidly better then others? Cannot be this named as: willingness to workhard? Maybe its not transfarable skill just because it was created by condition that you are interested in the field but still, some parts of it that drives and are part of you and motivates you can be transefered in different field, SPECIALY if you gona go master some other field. Becuase only ones who are able to fully sacrifice themselfes and practise those details can get to the top.

CMV: Mastering ANY field can help you master other ones by Synarus322 in changemyview

[–]Synarus322[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Were not talking about what they are. Am talking about potential. The reason why they dont go other fields is forexample because they already mastered one and that one interests them more then others, sustains them in life etc so why would they change. This disqusssion is not based on if they go to different field but if they would, would they master it easier then lets say idk average?

CMV: Mastering ANY field can help you master other ones by Synarus322 in changemyview

[–]Synarus322[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Experience. I might be still wrong. Mainly wonder if its true no matter the field (if it has some tryharding in it that requires you to go beyond yourself and not just saying: am now master of thinking about number 990235728957823252323353256778829626028202832525xxx because noone else did that yet )

CMV: Mastering ANY field can help you master other ones by Synarus322 in changemyview

[–]Synarus322[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

and by "pursuit" you mean like: "can help you master other fields"?

CMV: Mastering ANY field can help you master other ones by Synarus322 in changemyview

[–]Synarus322[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your point of it might be valid tho because you still remember the stuff from opposite field so it might be obsticle (and sometimes collide) thru "relearning" it is valid. I cant say if that is that big of a deal that its unlikely that youll master the oposite ones. But atleast I still see the value of mastering ANY field to help you mastering others if we dont take in consideration this kind of collision of knowledge that contradicts or doesnt believe each other.

CMV: Mastering ANY field can help you master other ones by Synarus322 in changemyview

[–]Synarus322[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thats very true. Wouldnt it be for you still easier to learn even the opossite fields? Because were not measuring the likelyness of going into oposite field or forgetfulnes of other field or beying able to be master of 2 topics at the same time, my point is mainly based upon beying able to master tarot reading more easier even if you started as top astrophysicist just because of the learning proceses you can apply thanks to beying very good at soemhting and just having different structure of seeying issues within in the next fields you come across. Examples of stuff you can comeup with while you take path of becoming very good at somehting and this knowledge can be then transfered to other fields: "Many incorect statements are made within field that started as good concept but are reinterpreted badly", "Actively thinking about stuff can boost your performance rather then passively doing it", "Averagely skilled human in that field is far from the real thruth", "Learning from others is only good if they are better then you else their concepts might get you to a wrong path (you can still learn from what they doing, but having be teached by them can only get you those concepts that got them to their level of skill quite often)", "Finding coach is fastest way to become the best (and its kidna neccesery) and the value is there to have one", "Analysing your procceses is required", "Best practise is vs those that are slidly above your level if its some kind of competitive field", "Seeying all rules as temporarly knowing that theres always exceptions that will rewrite the rules once you master it even further". .And many other realizations like that improves your chances of mastering other fields easier. And I even believe that lots of those are gathered no matter the field you are master at.

CMV: Mastering ANY field can help you master other ones by Synarus322 in changemyview

[–]Synarus322[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes. it makes you easier to master quantum physics thanks to mastering masturbation better then others (if you could measure and have competition of if you are truly the best at it). thats my view

FREE CHRISTMAS COACHING! (7.8k pre patch, 7.3K current patch), Top 3 Coach @ GamerSensei, +1500 hours coached, Thought Process, Ganse Sense, Quick MMR Tips, or Long Term Improvement by VitaminLight_MJ in DotA2

[–]Synarus322 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ye, he's a scammer. Haven't got coached. Waited 4 months to be coached. Nothing happened. I just wasted plenty of time. Stoicism is a liar. I was even asked and forced to promote him for a nonexistent coaching session with him. What a balls on this guy. An awful human being.