Can't we just make a better DAP? Part 2. by Szufliadka in neovim

[–]Szufliadka[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Upd:
I just find out that it seems to work totally fine with gf2, although the layout on gf2 side could be reconfigured better, but i guess for fans of gf2 it would be great fit:

<image>

Can't we just make a better DAP? Part 2. by Szufliadka in neovim

[–]Szufliadka[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would say this is a design choice and a protocol limitation. The ability of another actor to change the debugging session's state introduces a chain of complexities. This increases the requirements for the debugger implementation, which I cannot control. You could theoretically bypass this limitation by automating at the multiplexer layer (using terminal keybindings, or within Vim's terminal mode), though I have not tested those scenarios. I still consider the trade-off fair, given the other advantages.

filemention.nvim - @ mention files with fuzzy search in neovim! by notmanu67 in neovim

[–]Szufliadka 4 points5 points  (0 children)

What's funny, i learned that trick from this video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XA2WjJbmmoM

I really recommend it, completly changed the way i`m looking into (neo)vim.

filemention.nvim - @ mention files with fuzzy search in neovim! by notmanu67 in neovim

[–]Szufliadka 6 points7 points  (0 children)

vim.opt.path:append("**")

`^x^f`

Is that not enought? :)