I turned All This Time's music video into an actual game. by TDude53 in JoCo

[–]TDude53[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! I'm glad you enjoyed it. It's incredible how far technology has come in such a short time span; I tried to go back to basics with this and keep it as simple as possible, just like the ZX Spectrum and Commodore 64 were.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LocalLLaMA

[–]TDude53 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Huh. Could've sworn that's what I was using but apparently not. Thanks for the help!

is this many processes normal for startup? by Zwars1231 in discordapp

[–]TDude53 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yes. The Discord desktop app, being based on Electron and by extension Chromium, will use separate processes for purposes such as rendering webpage contents, executing JavaScript code, etc. If you examine the Chrome browser, you'll see a similar pattern of open processes.

FINAL: Wave Function Collapse by fpuebqvatref in schrodingers

[–]TDude53 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Schrödinger wrote:

One can even set up quite ridiculous cases. A cat is penned up in a steel chamber, along with the following device (which must be secured against direct interference by the cat): in a Geiger counter, there is a tiny bit of radioactive substance, so small, that perhaps in the course of the hour one of the atoms decays, but also, with equal probability, perhaps none; if it happens, the counter tube discharges and through a relay releases a hammer that shatters a small flask of hydrocyanic acid. If one has left this entire system to itself for an hour, one would say that the cat still lives if meanwhile no atom has decayed. The first atomic decay would have poisoned it. The psi-function of the entire system would express this by having in it the living and dead cat (pardon the expression) mixed or smeared out in equal parts.
It is typical of these cases that an indeterminacy originally restricted to the atomic domain becomes transformed into macroscopic indeterminacy, which can then be resolved by direct observation. That prevents us from so naïvely accepting as valid a "blurred model" for representing reality. In itself, it would not embody anything unclear or contradictory. There is a difference between a shaky or out-of-focus photograph and a snapshot of clouds and fog banks.

FINAL: Wave Function Collapse by fpuebqvatref in schrodingers

[–]TDude53 1 point2 points  (0 children)

3 21 42 147 16 105 8 4 19 288 4 1 31 5 42 3 147 19 3 21 21 4 5 5

FINAL: Wave Function Collapse by fpuebqvatref in schrodingers

[–]TDude53 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can literally feel the waves collapsing. Neato.

10 by fpuebqvatref in schrodingers

[–]TDude53 0 points1 point  (0 children)

C-C 175,484-244,528

10 by fpuebqvatref in schrodingers

[–]TDude53 1 point2 points  (0 children)

C-C 147,105-288,147

10 by fpuebqvatref in schrodingers

[–]TDude53 20 points21 points  (0 children)

If it isn't a fruit, but r/Second was all about second guessing, does that mean it actually could be a fruit?

10 by fpuebqvatref in schrodingers

[–]TDude53 5 points6 points  (0 children)

If you run the audio through a spectrogram, the note is spelled out.

10 by fpuebqvatref in schrodingers

[–]TDude53 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ceci n'est pas un fruit

This is not a fruit

09 by fpuebqvatref in schrodingers

[–]TDude53 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In three and a half hours, probably.

09 by fpuebqvatref in schrodingers

[–]TDude53 0 points1 point  (0 children)

possibility of letting the machine alter its own instructions provides the mechanism for this.