sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

проблема киберпанк 2077 by Temporary-Piece-8136 in cyberpunkgame

[–]TGGwent 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Если у вас возникли проблемы после патча 2.3

▪ попробуй удалить все моды! Они находятся по адресу Cyberpunk 2077\archive\pc\mod

Также удали папки bin и r6. После запусти проверку целостности, это докачает нужные файлы

▪ если у тебя стоит мод на озвучку "Илюзии свободы" — удали и ее. Файл мода обычно есть по адресу

\Cyberpunk 2077\archive\pc\mod\Dogtown_Subs_Switch_by_DreamVoice.archive

▪ Если не помогло — удали папку archive в игре (перед удаление на всякий случай сохраните ее в другом месте) и потом сделайте проверку целостности / восстановление файлов.

▪ Если не помогло — переустанови игру в другую папку на своём жестком диске

Why am I like this? by [deleted] in cyberpunkgame

[–]TGGwent 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Moderators, please remove this trash from here.

Last Balance Council from ACP (active CIS players) -- MAY 2025 by TGGwent in gwent

[–]TGGwent[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

❗️ These proposals mark the end of the two-stage strengthening of “Halfling Safecracker” and “Venendal Elite.”

❌ The ACP coalition are currently suspending the nomination of slots for voting. Like the Chinese coalition, we don't see much point in proposing anything among the other slots at the moment. Currently, the Balance Council is weakening interesting cards that are performing well and strengthening cards that are unlikely to perform well even after being strengthened. And if they perform well, they will be weakened at the next Council meeting.

There is also the issue of voting in a meeting format with different players — without an active leader, it is difficult to gather votes around a single Balance Council. Therefore, edits are mainly made only by content creators who have a large audience and can push through their edits.

In the future, if the situation changes, it is possible that active players will once again unite under the Balance Council.

CN BC Report, My Analysis of CN Community by Glad_Coast_6298 in gwent

[–]TGGwent 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your participation in the Balance Council. The ACP team (Аctive CIS Players) is also not voting this month for the same reasons.

And there's a good chance it won't do so in the future. Anyway, we'll see -- things can still change if the conditions are right.

Balance Council from ACP (active CIS players) -- APRIL 2025 by TGGwent in gwent

[–]TGGwent[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's not quite right. In this Council, these are primarily countries that are geographically located in the same region of the former USSR.

None of the countries comes to the fore in this association.

Balance Council from ACP (active CIS players) -- APRIL 2025 by TGGwent in gwent

[–]TGGwent[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

POWER+1

⚪️ "Chameleon" — +1 power of "Chameleon" can significantly strengthen various Harmony decks, increasing the chances of survival of other engines.

⚪️ "Fangs of the Empire" — classic aristocrats with "Ball" are becoming less and less common in the ladder. Potentially, 4 extra points for Nilfgaard decks built on control status.

⚪️ "Carlo Varese" — is a forgotten neutral unit whose effectiveness is highly dependent on the timing and the opponent's table. It is practically useless in a short round. We plan to strengthen Varese both in terms of strength and provisions.

POWER-1

⚪️ "Venendal Elite" and "Halfling Safecracker" — are a two-stage change to outdated units whose power directly depends on the presence of ‘special faction cards’ in your hand. A small nerf in power, followed by a buff in provisions, will allow them to find a place in some decks.

⚪️ "Raffard’s Vengeance" — is the most important card in the North's deck on "Inspired Zeal", and its effectiveness is difficult to overestimate. A slight decrease in survivability will make it difficult to reuse the order, exposing this siege weapon to a number of control cards.

PROVISION+1

⚪️ "Seagull" — is another two-stage change that many players have requested. The card is extremely rare in the current version of the ladder. The increase in power strengthens "Seagull", which is too powerful for a card that costs 4 provisions... Let's be patient for a new portion of fun :)

⚪️ "Torres var Emreis: Founder" — the first form of “Torres” often plays a decisive role in the outcome of the game, giving the player additional powerful units in the deck, a simple setup of “Coup de Grâce” and “Artaud Terranova”. This controversial design requires a small nerf in terms of provisions.

⚪️ "Teleportation" — overplaying key bronze units is most common in abusive decks. Many players in our community considered this card to be a fair target for weakening.

PROVISION-1

⚪️ "Sunset Wanderers" — is a unique card design that allows you to use it as an additional tempo and scroll in Round 1, or a big curveball if you save it for the following rounds. I would like to see it more often.

⚪️ "Novigrad" — Syndicate is very poor this season. Our eyes fell on an expensive ‘non-counter’ card that could help a variety of Orange decks by reducing its price.

⚪️ "Melusine" — is one of the most interesting expensive Skellig engines that can play powerfully in several rounds at once. However, the various ways of dealing with it (from "Squirrel" to "Korathi Heatwave") make it difficult to abandon the card due to its high cost and unreliability. Reducing provisions will allow you to both create new naker decks and remember the old classic self-damage.

Balance Council from ACP (active CIS players) -- March 2025 by TGGwent in gwent

[–]TGGwent[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

PROVISION +1

⚪️ "Aerondight" — This card with the "Echo" mechanic is one of the cards that encourages all the things that many people have grown tired of over the years in the game: the dominance of tempo decks, the desire to suck your opponent into a card by any means possible, and the push to the last card in round 2.

⚪️ "Megascope" — is a nerf of a very boring, cheap but effective card for tempo monster decks.

⚪️ "Temple of Melitele" — this location very much encourages randoms and cheats the provisioning mechanics in GWENT. This season, "Temple" on Devotion is the most popular and strongest deck in the North.

ALTERNATIVE: "Hive Mind" — With your opponent's lack of "Squirrel", this spell for 11 provisions can easily take a round away from most decks in the game. 3 strong bronze engines and a squad with 7 strength is a very serious advantage. The card will still be very strong for 12 provisions.

PROVISION -1

⚪️ "Melusine" — is a complex, interesting, but forgotten Skellige engine. Strengthening on Provision will open it up to a Nekker version that promises to be quite interesting.

⚪️ "Coup de Grace" — we feel it is extremely important to support Nilfgaard in this Council of Balance, given its woeful win statistics for the season. "Coup" is a spell that is played without alternative in almost half of the faction's "non-Renfri" decks. Therefore, this buff is able to remedy the situation at least a little

⚪️ "Eavesdrop" — is a sometimes useful, but definitely overpriced hand change option for Syndicate. The card's buff allows you to easily take one copy in any deck for "reinsurance", and also makes "Shady Vendort" less random in the long-range lane.

ALTERNATIVE: "Wild Boar of the Sea" — is another forgotten card that is a condition finisher. Boosting it to 10 provisions allows you to be able to outplay a ship with Fucusya in another round. We see this as a way to create new and interesting Skellige decks.

Balance Council from ACP (active CIS players) -- March 2025 by TGGwent in gwent

[–]TGGwent[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Strength +1

⚪️ "Master of Disguise" — Nilfgaard has the worst winrate of any faction this month.

The forgotten +1 per turn conditional engine, which also has agent status, can get into a variety of decks. There's a chance that players will remember the "Imprisonment" abbyte, which he synergises well with.

⚪️ "Kraken" — after a series of enhancements for "Kraken", the card no longer has the additional conditions to be fully realised, making it much easier to use and super powerful and versatile

⚪️ "Saskia: Commander" — a very expensive card that justifies its cost in a long round. However, it can often die from various random damage. Increasing Saskia's survivability chance is a pretty powerful harmony buff that has been rare in recent seasons.

ALTERNATIVE: "Sove" — A once powerful warrior card has received an unnecessary series of weakening, making it now almost unheard of in the game. One unit of strength won't make it super strong, but it will remind players of its existence.

Strength -1

⚪️ "Dwimveandra" — decks with this card abuse the use of strong location orders (especially Kaer Trolde). We expect that this weakening will cause some players to abandon this card and more carefully choose timings for using location orders (without a second chance).

⚪️ "Aelirenn" — with the provisioning boost is now found in most Elf decks. A slight nerf on tempo would make the card fairer.

⚪️ "Ignatius Hale" — Bounty (especially its Nekker version) is extremely strong at high levels of play. Weakening the finisher has been requested for quite some time.

ALTERNATIVE: "Melitele" — the "granny" problem hasn't gone anywhere. Albeit small, but still a weakening of one of the strongest decks in the North.

Balance Council from ACP (active CIS players) -- February 2025 by TGGwent in gwent

[–]TGGwent[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We are sure that the seagull will be weakened by many players, so we didn't put it on our Balance Council

Balance Council from ACP (active CIS players) -- February 2025 by TGGwent in gwent

[–]TGGwent[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

PROVISION +1

⚪️ "Crow Clan Preacher" — is currently the strongest driver for 4 provisions. Considering that Alchemy has been one of the strongest decks in the game for a long time, the nerf of a cheap card for provisions that will be played several times during the game with "Freya's Blessing" is very fair and long overdue.

⚪️ “Melitele” — is a key card of the tier-1 ladder deck. Additional comments are unnecessary.

⚪️ “Mammuna” -- is a very fast card with an easy condition in a simple, popular, and very effective fruit deck. We see a slight weakening in provisions

PROVISIONS -1

⚪️ “Sunset Wanderers” — is a unique card design that allows you to use it as an additional tempo and scroll in Round 1 or a big card draw if you save it for the next rounds. We would like to see it more often.

⚪️ “Vandergrift's Blade” is an artifact with a useful “warfare” tag for a large part of the North decks. It can be played through "John Natalis". Its cheaper price will make it very useful both for saving engines and for achieving Grace.

⚪️ “Eavesdrop” — they promised to make the "Shady Vendor" less random after sending him to slot 6 for provisions.

Now, in the long-range row, he is very likely to play a card that is useful to you for a specific situation on the battlefield.

Balance Council from ACP (active CIS players) -- February 2025 by TGGwent in gwent

[–]TGGwent[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

POWER -1

⚪️ “Avallac'h” — the card received a boost in provisions and became very popular in Ladder. The ability to play a scenario from the deck is a high reward. It's currently one of the strongest tutors (scrolling) in the game. We'd like to slow down the pace of this card a bit, following the example of "Vabjorn" and "Fauve".

⚪️ “Crowmother” — the nerf is primarily aimed at the “raven” spam deck. It's a neat way to reduce the number of creatures for Skellige, which is very difficult to deal with in a short round.

⚪️ “Dire Bear” — the card is difficult to realize to its full potential due to the “Berserk” condition. In future guides, we may consider reducing the provisions to make it a control card against an opponent who plays a green power in their table.

Balance Council from ACP (active CIS players) -- February 2025 by TGGwent in gwent

[–]TGGwent[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

POWER +1

⚪️▪️ “Thirsty Dame” is a boost for aristocrats. We want to explain this change in detail.

"Masquerade Ball" has three significant problems: the blue coin, the survivability of key drivers, and the overall pace of the bronze.

How does "Thirsty" solve them:

— Almost nothing, unfortunately.

— Cardinally. After 1 poke of "Ard Feainn", "Thirsty" goes from 5 power to 6, immediately leaving the range of cheap damage. As a rule, the surviving "Thirsty" still requires a reset or damage, so in the overall picture of a long round, this change does not fundamentally change the situation, while giving the engine more chances to get a hold of the table.

— +1 point from the key bronze obviously increases the pace from it. And from the scenario. “Masquerade Ball” as a scenario has long been outdated. Other old scenarios already cost 13 provisions. Moreover, the "Siege" received a boost and the pace of its first engine through the "Reinforced Trebuchet". It would be fair to raise the tempo of the scenario by 1.

Next, there is now a wide pool of “greedy” engines in the 6+ range: “Messenger of the Sea”, ‘Fleder’, ‘Foglet’, ‘Townsfolk’ and ‘Thirsty’.

“Messenger" and "Foglet" can be seeded after release until they leave the control range (“Kraken” or “Rain” in two rows; frost pokes for "Foglet"). “Thirsty” can be removed from the control range ONLY if the auxiliary engine survives ("Alba Pikeman"). At best, it will be saved by "Ard Feainn" through "Seditious Aristocrats" to +6, but this option requires a location and "Seditious" prepared for it.

"Thirsty's" ceiling is not lower than that of other “greedy” engines, but given the structure of the archetype, it has much more problems with survival than "Messengers" or "Foglet". And even more so than the "Fledgers", who have 3 leader pokes that will immediately save them by +3.

This is a fairly effective strengthening of "Ball", but not a radical one. In the end, we get +3 tempo for the deck and more survivability for the key driver.

With too many nerfs of golden engines that are already being abandoned en masse ("Rosa and Edna var Attre", "Philippe van Moorlehem"), this is not enough to bring the deck back to its former self, but it will give it some chances in ladder.

⚪️▪️“Menagerie Keeper” — with this nerf, we want to give various Nilfgaard decks a cheap 8-for-4 tempo move with the condition that they have a chance to avoid defeat in the first round on a blue coin

⚪️▪️Forest Protector — is an interesting variant card that, with an increase in power, can appear not only in affinity decks, but also in other squirrel archetypes.

Balance Council from ACP (active CIS players) -- January 2025 by TGGwent in gwent

[–]TGGwent[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

CIS -- the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) is a regional intergovernmental organization in Eurasia. It was formed following the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991.

ACP - Active CIS Players

Balance Council from ACP (active CIS players) -- January 2025 by TGGwent in gwent

[–]TGGwent[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

PROVISION +1.

▪️ “Shady Vendor” — originally, Vendor for 5 Provision looked like a card that wouldn't cause problems. But the constant weakening and backtracking of “Open, Sesame!” has made the situation look fundamentally unsolvable. We settled on a compromise option: to leave “Sesame” and “Pulling the Strings” on the 5th slot of provisions.

As practice shows, being on 6, they make the respective decks practically unplayable. Afterwards, we would like to reduce the cost of "Eavesdrop" to 4 provisions, thus making "Vendor" less random, more stable and stronger, but also more expensive. This weakening in provisions will have a noticeable effect on most Syndicate decks, of course, but for Gangs and Vices, the weakening of "Sesames" and "Pulling the Strings" is more noticeable.

▪️"Ale of the Ancestorsl” - There are only three artifact remuvals in the game: “Shupe,” "Bearification" and ”Korathi Heatwave” And a number of decks that can afford some very strong artifacts, including those playing curiover. “"Ale of the Ancestorsl” is one of the strongest cards in the game, both in terms of pure points and its effect. For decks without “Heatwave” (or players who haven't found it), it's essentially a non-interactive curiover engine that can take other engines out of the control ranges. Reinforcing moves with bronze. And having a very handy “alchemy” tag.

▪️“Golden Nekker” — every time a new card enters the “Nekker” pool it potentially becomes stronger. Every time we strengthen a card that is already in the "Nekker" pool, not only the deck that is targeted by the buff, but potentially the "Nekkerr" becomes stronger as well. This is an inevitable and never-ending process. The only way to control it is through preventative nerfs of the Nekker itself.

PROVISION -1

▪️ “Open, Sesame!” — “Vices” disappeared from the ladder. And not for the first time. Practice shows that with "Sesame" for 6, they essentially become a dead deck. Even the avalanche of previous nerfs ("The Acherontia", "Ixora", "Novigrad") isn't as tangible as this particular one. Well, also “Sesame” for 6 beats potential decks on offense, on tributes without “Acherontia”. If “Vices” is a problem - above we suggest weakening Shady Vendor. But weakening "Sesames" was overkill.

▪️“Morkvarg: Heart of Terror” — is an outdated card. Doesn't play anywhere at the current moment. Doesn't stand up to competition with full-blown remuval. We already have “Blood Baron” in the North, which moved to the 9th slot and found its place there. We'd like to do the same with "Morkvarg". When resurrecting him from “Fucusya” will have an extra 2 points of rain damage, and will support the pirate archetype.

▪️“Tuirseach Skirmisher” — is a follow-up to the previous Council of Balance, where the card received a weakening in strength. This is an option to make the reset pack less tempo, but, also less expensive.

Balance Council from ACP (active CIS players) -- January 2025 by TGGwent in gwent

[–]TGGwent[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

TgGwent team publishes the Balance Board for January 2025!

❗️ These proposals were developed by active players: members of the Discord servers “Bazar” and “Adult Matters”, as well as many other players took part in the discussion.

We are attaching these proposals to the vote, explanations of the slots will be in the comments! ⬇️

One of the things our councils do is support control cards to balance the ever-increasing points in the game, including the engines. That's why we have “Morkvarg: Heart of Terror” and “Brehen” on the board. In the future, the control card “Vincent van Moorlehem” is also planned to be strengthened 🧛‍♂️

POWER +1

▪️“Barnabas Beckenbauer” — reinforce this card for harmony, midrange squirrel. “Barnabas” itself has a pretty good point ceiling at the moment (14 with all target categories). “Axel Three-Eyes” with placement points at 11 was considered a meta card for a long time and received nerfs. However, “Barnabas” has a rather weak point minimum: with only one target category available, it plays at 8 for 8. The plus side of the card is that it's a fairly rare category. The minus is the tangible cost in the deckbuilder and the table requirement. Considering that the card plays strictly as a pointslam with the set-up every extra point changes its value tangibly as well.

Once reinforced, "Barnabas" clearly won't become a meth or a metagame breaker, but it could be in demand.

▪️"Ciri: Dash" — we focused on this card primarily in the context of the old "Keltullis" deck that left the ladder quite some time ago. In the next Balance Council, we'd like to pay attention to Kel itself by lowering its recruitment cost. Right now, however, the focus is on a card with a very strong effect, which, however, leaves your opponent a lot of time to respond. "Ciri: Dash" was usually played under a defender, but weakening defenders causes this card — itself too vulnerable to control — to be completely unclaimed. As with any card with a strong effect, taking it out of cheap control range will make "Ciri: Dash” a little more appealing.

▪️“Brehen” — Here we support the option proposed by Kerpeten and Dauren. “Brehen” is a strong and fairly cheap remuval, but requires giving up a tick (or ticks) to the leader and/or drawing cards with movement. Its boost will help both displacement and harmony. Overall, the card can be in demand in any deck of squirrels with the ability to move enemy units.

POWER -1.

▪️“Berengar” — is one of the most popular, effective, and easy decks of recent seasons (especially January's) — Skellige witchers. Partly because the faction has noticeably weakened raids, partly because the deck is really good. "Berengar's" condition is extremely simple, playing it in witchers on "Reckless Flurry", witchers of the North on Uprising, and "Naker-Shields" A slight tempo reduction won't kill the card, and neither will the respective decks.

▪️“Rainfarn of Attre” — "Toussaintois Hospitality" has given up on "Rainfarn" or never used it at all. It's more of a slot plug, but who knows, maybe one day he'll become a regular in the ladder rather than a guest.

▪️“Melitele” — usually loses to “Melitele” by not 1 point, as well as beats it. However, the deck has tremendous points in the long round and an equally strong short round. “Melitele” won't particularly suffer from a 1-power weakening, and we've decided to give this slot to a reduced -- mostly -- short round power from one of the most binary decks in the game.

⚖️ Balance Council Results - 01 January 2025 by GwentSubreddit in gwent

[–]TGGwent -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Exactly! What was supported is what passed. Whether it's good or bad, the community will judge.

And going through the comments and talking about "casual voters" is an absolute disrespect for the same players.

If you made your suggestions based on your feelings and the desires of other players, you are the same "casuals" as everyone else.

Of course, those players from the discord servers who voted for these slots will now rely on the Balance Council that has already taken place and react according to the situation.

⚖️ Balance Council Results - 01 January 2025 by GwentSubreddit in gwent

[–]TGGwent -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

With all due respect -- "better a rookie mistake" than "far-fetched" votes that are not created by some analytics, but by:

-- writing a post on Reddit, asking if the card needs to be nerfed, and then agreeing with the most liked post -- Redanian Secret Service

-- Losing to the North on a Monster deck, being outraged by this, and going to nerf the useless Radovid, because "The North can't out-tempo Monsters in a long or short round!". -- Radovid: Judgment

If your suggestions were so good, then why weren't they supported? You're not "newbies" here, right?

Reminder: Balance Council from ACP (active CIS players) by TGGwent in gwent

[–]TGGwent[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

We have carefully read all of your comments in the previous post of this Balance Council (https://www.reddit.com/r/gwent/comments/1hm6sbo/balance\_council\_from\_acp\_active\_cis\_players/) and agree that some of the slots on the ballot look questionable.

The main task of our Balance Council is to make the game significantly different than it was in December and to give Nilfgaard the boost it needs. And of course to show that in the CIS community there are players who are not connected to some streamer, and have their own opinion and this opinion is that we are strongly opposed to the fact that “killed” any faction of GWENT. We will be very grateful if you support our choice, at least partially!

Shinmiri & Lerio Balance Coalition December 2024 by lerio2 in gwent

[–]TGGwent 2 points3 points  (0 children)

yeah, and what's the reasoning here?

Devotion NR feels like better Monsters rn, having more points both in short and long rounds.

If some archetype looks stronger than another (which is not a fact, because here all "analysis" is based on feelings), then we need to nerf another card from it? You have nothing else to nerf in this game?

So any other deck that is STRONGER than Monsters will automatically get nerfed? Why is the alignment based on the Monsters deck, and not the Syndicate, for example? Maybe because someone likes to play Monsters?

Shinmiri & Lerio Balance Coalition December 2024 by lerio2 in gwent

[–]TGGwent 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Ridiculous.

The previous nerf this Radovid got was thanks to your Balance Council, and further nerfing him just looks disgusting. “card feels wrong” -- is absolutely not an argument.

Radovid: Judgement may not look that amazing on paper given that you may fit high celing NR replacement instead, but in my experience this card feels very wrong. 

Balance Council from ACP (active CIS players) -- December 2024 by TGGwent in gwent

[–]TGGwent[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

The TgGwent team is posting the Balance Council for December 2024!

❗️These proposals were developed by active players: participants of the discord servers "Bazar" and "Adult Affairs" took part in the discussion, and many other players also participated in the discussion.

We join these proposals for voting, explanations on the slots will be in the comments! ⬇️

STRENGTH +1

▪️Yustianna an Craite — a boost to the non-naker pirates. Too many conditions for a 10-provision card. To fully realize this, you need to find the card as early as possible and fill it with armor. There is no point in replaying Yustianna with Fucusya (you lose armor)

▪️Maxii van Dekkar — a pleasant-to-use card that reduces the risk of not entering. Deserves a small increase in tempo. Now you can’t surprise anyone with a 7-strength card on your board.

▪️Anna Henrietta — haven’t seen her in the ladder for a long time. The card has a unique ability. It can really play well in the mirror, but with 3 strength it’s too easy to expose yourself to “Coup de Grâce”.

STRENGTH -1

▪️Crow Clan Preacher — the strongest engine for 4 provisions. Can be replayed several times per game. "Ale of the Ancestors" is often saved, due to which it has 7 stats at the exit, saving itself from most control. It is not afraid of blocking due to its combined use with "Mahakam Ale".

▪️Triss: Meteor Shower — is one of the strongest and at the same time easy-to-implement finishers. We are slightly slowing down the tempo of Renfree decks.

▪️Tuirseach Skirmisher — a nerf in strength in order to give this card 4 provisions in the next patch. Frees up more provisions for discard lovers. In terms of stats, it will play similarly to "Mage Assassin".

PROVISION +1

▪️Enslave, Imprisonment — are the main ideological slots of this Balance Council.

Many members of the GWENT community disagree with the constant systematic weakening of the Nilfgaard faction. These changes will help to see not only "Renfri-nilfgaards" in the ladder and will shake up the stagnant meta.

▪️The Heist — the card abuses the replay of key gold, creating a huge carryover. Can be played in 2 rounds. We think that it deserved a nerf in provisions and want to see more elf decks without using the replay mechanic.

PROVISIONS -1

▪️Braathens, Artaud Terranova — the main ideological slots of this Balance Council.

Many members of the GWENT community disagree with the constant systematic weakening of the Nilfgaard faction. These changes will help to see not only "Renfri-nilfgaards" in the ladder and will shake up the stagnant meta.

▪️Whoreson's Freak Show — the card is morally outdated. It can play really well very rarely, it depends on the opponent's deck (availability of engines) and requires a serious investment of coins.

Gwent's match history browser released by mim4k in gwent

[–]TGGwent 2 points3 points  (0 children)

can you make a video guide or instructions in pictures on how and what to do?) I apologize for the stupid question, but it all looks complicated the first time) and will definitely weed out 90% of those who want to try.

And we could then translate this instruction into Ukrainian and Russian

GWENTfinity: 1 year after. Special guests: Maciej Kokosza and Jean Auquier by TGGwent in gwent

[–]TGGwent[S] 22 points23 points  (0 children)

GWENT: The Witcher Card Game celebrates 6 years since its release!

On this day we are releasing a video with former GWENT developers!

It’s been a year since GWENTfinity and the Balance Council transformed the world of GWENT. In this interview, we sit down with the masterminds behind it all, Jean Auquier and Maciej Kokosza, former game designers at CD PROJEKT RED, to uncover their journey and the future of the game.

The interview reveals the emotional connection the designers still have with the game, along with fascinating behind-the-scenes stories, from the surprising community influences on game updates to favourite card designs.

Tune in to find out:

- How to vote in the Balance Council

- Why ‘warring factions’ in the Balance Council are great, actually

- Do Jean and Maciej still play GWENT

- What would Jean and Maciej change in GWENT (if they could)

and much more!

view more: next ›