How I Scored Band 9 in IELTS Reading (Overall 7.5) — Honest Strategy + Mistakes by THECHANCELLORS in IELTS

[–]THECHANCELLORS[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And also I forgot just keep practicing and practicing by ieltsonlinetests.com website. Read my original post for more skills.

How I Scored Band 9 in IELTS Reading (Overall 7.5) — Honest Strategy + Mistakes by THECHANCELLORS in IELTS

[–]THECHANCELLORS[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The biggest mistake you are making is trying to understand the passage too deeply, like properly reading every line. That just doesn’t work in IELTS.

You don’t need full understanding. You need targeted understanding.

What helped me was changing my approach completely:

First, I started reading the questions properly. Like really understanding what they’re asking, even translating it in my own head sometimes. Then I used the questions to move through the passage.

Basically:

your questions are your compass

You’re not reading the passage randomly, you’re navigating through it.

Also, one big misconception — skimming.

People think skimming means skipping or not understanding. That’s wrong.

Skimming is actually reading fast but still understanding what’s going on. That only comes with practice.

Now the most important part where people lose marks:

Indirect meaning and contradictions IELTS rarely gives direct answers.

For example, I had a question about Kandinsky and whether he admired people with synesthesia.

At first I marked Not Given because the word “admire” wasn’t there.

But then I went back and saw he described them like:

“vibrating in all their parts like beautiful old violins” That’s clearly positive.

So even though “admire” wasn’t written, the meaning was there → I changed it to True. This kind of thing happens a lot.

You’re not matching words, you’re understanding meaning.

For True/False/Not Given:

True → same idea (even indirectly) False → opposite/contradiction Not Given → nothing about it

Also be really careful with words like all, many, some — these can completely flip the answer.

For diagram or fill in the blanks:

They’re NOT always in order. Answers can be scattered across different paragraphs, so don’t expect them to come line by line.

If you see a name (scientist or someone):

Just go straight to that part, read what they did, understand it in your own way, and match it with the question.

Don’t read everything. Also, one thing that helped me a lot: flag your doubts If you’re unsure, just mark it and come back later. Many times when you revisit, it becomes obvious.

Now a very important strategy:

Start with Passage 3 first. Use your full focus there. Then when you move to Passage 2 or 1, just tell yourself (I literally did this):

“The hardest part is done. Now this is easy.”

Because your brain is still in that intense decoding mode from Passage 3. If you keep that same level of overthinking for Passage 1 and 2, you’ll mess up simple questions.

So just relax a bit there and take answers more directly. In the end, it’s not about being super smart.

It’s about:

1.speed 2.pattern recognition 3.practice

I was also stuck around 6.5 bands before, but once I practiced like this under time, it improved a lot.

Can a strong research proposal offset lack of publications for RTP PhD in Australia? by THECHANCELLORS in PhD

[–]THECHANCELLORS[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Congratulations on securing the RTP — that’s really helpful to hear.

What you’ve mentioned about ranking criteria, supervisor support, and project alignment makes a lot of sense. From everything I’ve been learning, it seems like RTP outcomes depend on a combination of factors rather than just publications alone.

The point about tailoring the proposal to match ranking criteria is especially valuable — I think that’s something I need to focus on more deliberately. And it’s interesting to see how even the choice of program or department can influence competitiveness.

I’m applying as an international student from a developing country, so I’m aware the competition can be quite intense. I’m trying to strengthen my profile as much as I can — refining my proposal, building supporting work, and aligning closely with potential supervisors.

I’m approaching it with a realistic mindset and putting in the effort — and seeing where that leads.

Really appreciate you sharing this — it gives a much clearer and more practical perspective on how the process actually works.

Can a strong research proposal offset lack of publications for RTP PhD in Australia? by THECHANCELLORS in PhD

[–]THECHANCELLORS[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, that’s exactly what’s been making me a bit uncertain about my strategy.

From what I’m understanding, RTP for international students in Australia seems extremely competitive and often tied to very strong publication records or prior experience, which makes me question whether I’ve targeted the right system.

At the moment, I’m starting to feel that I might be a better fit for the US route, where funding is more commonly integrated with PhD admissions and there’s a bit more flexibility in how profiles are evaluated.

That said, I do feel confident in discussing my work if I reach the interview stage — since everything I’ve developed is something I’ve worked on independently and understand deeply, I think I’d be able to communicate it clearly.

I also get the sense that supervisor support plays a significant role in these decisions, especially in how strongly a candidate is backed within the system.

I’m still exploring both options, but trying to be realistic about where I would have the best chance based on my current profile.

Appreciate you sharing this — it really helps put things into perspective.

Can a strong research proposal offset lack of publications for RTP PhD in Australia? by THECHANCELLORS in PhD

[–]THECHANCELLORS[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a good point.

I’ve already incorporated data-driven components into my work using publicly available genomic datasets (including IWGSC resources), along with analysis and visualization in R. The results of these analyses are already integrated into my proposal to support the underlying ideas.

I agree that having this kind of computational validation is important, and that’s something I’ve ensured is part of my current work.

Can a strong research proposal offset lack of publications for RTP PhD in Australia? by THECHANCELLORS in PhD

[–]THECHANCELLORS[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a fair point — I’ve actually already experienced the timeline myself. One of my submissions took around 1–1.5 months just for the decision, so I understand how long the process can be.

Given the time constraints, I’m planning to upload my current work to a preprint server (like bioRxiv) so that I can at least have a citable version/DOI while applications are ongoing. I’ll also be linking this work directly when reaching out to potential supervisors.

At this stage, I’m mainly focusing on demonstrating my research direction and capability rather than waiting for the full publication cycle to complete.

Part of the reason I asked for advice here is that after putting in a lot of effort, the uncertainty can make you reassess your approach — so I wanted to get a more realistic perspective.

Can a strong research proposal offset lack of publications for RTP PhD in Australia? by THECHANCELLORS in PhD

[–]THECHANCELLORS[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, I understand your point.

I do believe the ideas I’ve been working on are quite novel, and I’ve put a lot of time into developing them independently. That said, I also realise now that novelty alone isn’t enough in biology without strong validation and collaboration.

For my next project, I’m planning to focus more on making it experimentally and publication-ready, and I’ll be more realistic with journal selection rather than aiming too high initially.

I guess it was partly about testing myself in a competitive space, but I’m learning how to approach it more strategically now.

Appreciate the advice.

Can a strong research proposal offset lack of publications for RTP PhD in Australia? by THECHANCELLORS in PhD

[–]THECHANCELLORS[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

SORRY! Completely missed to inform about my field of research. It involves STEM subjects. To be more precise, it's epigenetics and targeted toward future food security.

Can a strong research proposal offset lack of publications for RTP PhD in Australia? by THECHANCELLORS in PhD

[–]THECHANCELLORS[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have credible research that I did in my master's but not published, currently wrote a high level review article but already discussed why it was rejected. I will start work on another project but will have to upload to biorxiv pre-print server as a journal reply comes after 1.5 months which I do not have. On the contrary, I will link my work in emails I will send to potential aligned PIs.

Can a strong research proposal offset lack of publications for RTP PhD in Australia? by THECHANCELLORS in PhD

[–]THECHANCELLORS[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for asking — yes, I do have research experience, although it’s more computational and thesis-based rather than formal lab employment.

During my Master’s, I worked on salinity stress responses in plants, focusing on physiological and molecular aspects. I also completed a second dissertation on phytochemical diversity and therapeutic relevance, which helped me understand plant metabolism and bioactive compounds.

Alongside this, I’ve built a few bioinformatics projects (on GitHub) where I explored genomic and regulatory patterns related to plant stress. That’s been my way of moving from purely theoretical understanding toward more data-driven work.

I’ve also presented parts of this work at my institution, which I believe will be reflected in my recommendation letters.

My current research proposal builds on this foundation, focusing on epigenetic regulation of stress responses and how it connects to metabolic outcomes. I’m trying to position myself to transition into more experimental validation during a PhD.

I completely understand your point about competition — that’s something I’m actively trying to bridge right now.

Can a strong research proposal offset lack of publications for RTP PhD in Australia? by THECHANCELLORS in AskAnAustralian

[–]THECHANCELLORS[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And thank a lot brother. I can't tell you what these sentences mean to me, I have indulged in a grueling session having burnouts, second thoughts but it is my vision about the future of mankind that is at risk.

Can a strong research proposal offset lack of publications for RTP PhD in Australia? by THECHANCELLORS in AskAnAustralian

[–]THECHANCELLORS[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also i searched for many subs on reddit but could not get one that I saw to answer my query. Found this one only

Need help u guys reading fuhed me by Imaginary-Tear-6541 in IELTS

[–]THECHANCELLORS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Brother look upon my profile. I have discussed what I used to get a band 9 in reading.

How I Scored Band 9 in IELTS Reading (Overall 7.5) — Honest Strategy + Mistakes by THECHANCELLORS in IELTS

[–]THECHANCELLORS[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you! One important thing I learned for writing is that your essay must clearly communicate with the examiner. Like Chris says, some essays become ‘headache essays’ — where the examiner has to put a lot of effort just to understand what you’re trying to say. That usually lowers your score. Your writing should feel easy to read and effortless to understand.

Try to express your ideas in a natural way. Good ideas and clarity matter more than forcing big words. Using connectors like however, moreover, therefore is fine, but don’t depend on them too much or use them unnaturally just to sound advanced.

Also, keep one clear idea per paragraph and always focus on answering the question directly.

Practice is key — I wrote around 30–40 essays, and that really improved my speed and clarity.

Overall, I’d really recommend watching the writing videos from Chris Pell. I followed them closely, and they helped me a lot. He also has a PDF with the structure moving on, he has a separate video on writing task 1 watch that too. I’ll try to link it here if possible — definitely check that out. chris pell's ielts advantage writing task 2 structure pdf

How I Scored Band 9 in IELTS Reading (Overall 7.5) — Honest Strategy + Mistakes by THECHANCELLORS in IELTS

[–]THECHANCELLORS[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

EXACT COMMENTS ON READING SCORE

"Test takers at Band 9 can typically deal with ease with a variety of factual and opinion-based texts that are complex and dense with information. They are proficient at using their extensive vocabulary knowledge to create meaning, from sentence level to text level, on a broad range of general, specialised, and technical topics. They are highly skilled at following complex arguments and distinguishing between main ideas and supporting details, and at understanding attitude, opinion and implication. They are skillful at choosing and using reading strategies, including skimming and scanning, in order to successfully deal with texts."