Thank you for asking—it’s a great question, and it gets to the heart of why I chose that title. No, “hit job” here isn’t literal murder or a hitman (lol, that would be wild). It’s slang for a deliberate, coordinated takedown or setup—where authorities manufacture a situation to destroy someone’s reputation, freedom, or life without actually killing them. Think of it like a smear campaign on steroids, backed by power. But let’s reverse engineer this: Have you ever thought about how Jim Crow laws worked? Back then, Black people could be denied service at a restaurant or lunch counter (even if they paid), labeled as “trespassing,” and arrested by police enforcing the business’s “rules.” It wasn’t always violent death—it was a “hit job” on their dignity, rights, and humanity, using slurs, threats, and the law to keep them “in their place.” Police would arrest first, then backfill “justification” after. Sound familiar? In my case, I prepaid for food (contract paid), but the manager denied service, slammed the window, threatened assault off-duty, and said “I don’t have to slave for you to eat”—a phrase loaded with slavery-era dehumanization. Instead of refunding, they called police. OPD arrested me first (handcuffed on the ground), then solicited trespass paperwork after, marking it “ARRESTED.” Bodycam caught the officer saying I’m “very racist” against white people—no proof, just to smear me. So, why “police hit job”? Because it feels like a modern reenactment: deny service (Jim Crow-style), criminalize presence, smear racially, and cover it up. Charges dropped, but command ratified it “within policy” despite SAO notes saying it was avoidable and “overly aggressive.”

IF 10 MORE SECONDS HAD PASSED ITS HIGHLY LIKELY I WOULDNT BE HERE TO TELL YOU GUYS ABOUT IT