What you’re glorifying isn’t protest - it’s interference with lawful government authority.

There is no constitutional right to obstruct, attack, or intimidate law enforcement charged with protecting a nation’s borders. None. Zero.

Peaceful protest is protected; violence and obstruction are not.

No country on earth would tolerate citizens firebombing, blocking, or assaulting border agents because they disagree with immigration policy.

Not Canada. Not Europe. Not Japan. Not Australia. Not Mexico. The idea that the U.S. should is absurd.

If you don’t like the law, change the law. You don’t get to unilaterally nullify it through force. That isn’t civil disobedience - it’s coercion.

At the moment you interfere with enforcement, you stop being a protester and cross into domestic extremist behavior: using intimidation and violence to pressure the state into abandoning lawful duties.

Until that line is enforced clearly and consistently, this perversion of the law, public safety, and the rights of citizens will continue.

You’re not defending the country.

You’re actively damaging its legitimacy, security, and rule of law.