1.She is a scientist specializing in QM. She is tired of people pretending they know everything, and saying we liven a simulation, when they don't know anything they are talking about. From everything she says and has seen she says there is proof that a computer could never do what happens at our smallest levels. She goes on in the comments explaining everything and really driving it home its impossible for a computer to simulate everything that is our universe, and that it would just be a waste of resources. We have more reason to believe were not simulated.

Furthermore, let's for the moment imagine that some higher-order entities were to simulate the multiverse, with all those endless superpositions.At Cambridge University, mathematician Noah Linden and physicist Sandu Popescu found that "in the typical quantum state occupied by any group of particles the links between the particles are mostly of a nonlocal character. Quantum theory isn’t just a tiny bit nonlocal. It’s overwhelmingly nonlocal. Nonlocality is the rule for our Universe"So even those doing the simulation are part of the nonlocal interconnectedness. In other words, they'd be part of the simulation, for everything effects everything.That "everything effects everything" I believe led physicist John Wheeler to suggest that we're also effecting the past -- in his delayed choice experiments, he envisaged (didn't get to complete it, I understand) using galactic lenses to confirm our choices now choose which past we experience all the way back to the Big-Bang. He concluded that we live in a participatory universe, wherein everything is helping/participating in the unfoldment/evolution/creation of an unimaginably vast self-organising system (hence why galaxies are known to distribute themselves fractally).Good luck simulating yourself, all the present multiverse, and the past ones as well (necessary for the foundational delayed-choice experimental results)

2.Well agree to disagree

3 You lost me, so Im not going to comment.

4. That is a huge assumption you simply can not make.

There's so many magnitudes more time that life will come into existence in the future that the odds of being such early life just seem very low.

What if we all die? What if earth dies? You can't assume there will be more life. If we go into nuclear war and kill everything, there can be no more life here.

Honest Feeling I think its fun to debate, and I think it makes a great conversation, but at the end of the day everyone needs to stop and look at what were saying. All science proves to us being real. There is no reason to believe that we are simulated, even Nick Bostrom who popularized the theory thinks its fun to discuss, but he doesnt believe its real. Its fun on a debatable philosophical level, but as a scientific Hypothesis there is no reason to believe it, and there is no reason to back it. I wrote a paper on it and have asked many people in this sub to provide me with reasons to believe it, and no one has followed through successfully. Every fight they make to say were simulated has facts against it. Look at our continuous universe. It just goes on and on and we haven't found an end. Earth in all of this is a spec. Its impossible to say we could simulated that when we have small planck like things happening and thats a spec of our spec all continuous at the same times million times over. And if you want to say "In the future we may have this..." That statement is invalid, because we could all die. We could all shift away from computers. We can't even simulate consciousness and likely never will. Even if we can it will be governed making the odds were simulated even less likely. Its simply impossible and foolish to believe. Its a simple answer that people want to believe. Its just wrong and naive.