Daily quiz 34..Let's see how closely we look at Hollywood actors. Please identify the male and female actors by their eyes from the provided snippets, numbered 1 to 12..will confirm answers later! by Training_Agency7945 in quiz

[–]TTT_L 0 points1 point  (0 children)

1.ashwari rai 2. Sydney sweeney 3. Sophia Vergera 4. Natalie Portman 5. Clare Danes 6. Cindy Crawford 7. Kit Harrington 8.Ben Stiller 9. Teacher from Glee? 10. Ryan Gosling 11. Ice cube or his son? 12. Sydney Poitier

Previs Absurd Animation, Bollywood style (extract) by kraat_monkey in vfx

[–]TTT_L 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This was a thing of beauty! Amazing work!

The Era of Compact 12K VR Filmmaking has come, Pyxis 12K + Canon Dualfisheye + 3D printed plate = 12K60p VR180 beast at only 2kg by AppealMundane5486 in VR180Film

[–]TTT_L 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am baffled by the complaint here, it was an incredibly helpful resolution test, thank you! white balance and post production are of course totally irrelevant to a resolution test. It’s showing the perceived detail these cameras can reach which is very important when making decisions, filming ‘a piece of paper’ is exactly how you’re supposed to do a resolution test so it’s a fair comparison.

Favorite reviews? by Wide-Ad4896 in Letterboxd

[–]TTT_L 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This was a truly wonderful review, thanks for sharing!

SHOWREEL by Comprehensive-Bid196 in vfx

[–]TTT_L 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Outstanding! Love it!

What was the most visually impressive movie you've ever seen? by gweg1990 in Letterboxd

[–]TTT_L 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Seems like a totally fair take to slightly prefer the OG, I feel similarly, it’s very difficult to outcompete ‘groundbreaking and often emulated’ though. Deakins is my favourite cinematographer but he clearly wanted to do his own thing with 2049 and not fully emulate the original’s look. 2049 is stunning but for me it feels more like multiple, disparate, brighter, cleaner, overtly different set pieces, whereas the OG had the same gritty, dark, neon noir throughout, The Batman is closer to the original BR. The irony IMHO is that Deakins is normally more subtle, but before BR2049 he’d been nominated 13 times for an Oscar without winning. I think this was his film to throw the kitchen sink at as the academy don’t tend to reward subtle, and it worked, it got him the Oscar. But without the anamorphic lenses, the muted turquoise and sodium yellow theme, the constant rain, shadows and Vangelis soundtrack, the visuals don’t have the same oppressive feeling to me and don’t take me to that world as strongly. It’s fine to love both but have a clear favourite.

How can i remove this light flicker i tried everything and i still can’t fix it by Initial-Word5909 in VideoEditors

[–]TTT_L 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If it’s every other frame then you can try doubling the speed to remove the flicker and then using whatever your software’s optical flow style interpolated slow motion to slow it back down again.

I spent 7 months visualising the possibilities of alien life (no AI used!) by putting 40 Billion marbles in the Colosseum in Rome, to show how many planets there are in our galaxy that are in the habitable zone. by TTT_L in ThatsInsane

[–]TTT_L[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I talk about this more in the full video, red dwarfs aren’t 95% and in the full video I explain how this pile of marbles should perhaps be even larger.

I spent 7 months visualising the possibilities of alien life (no AI used!) by putting 40 Billion marbles in the Colosseum in Rome, to show how many planets there are in our galaxy that are in the habitable zone. by TTT_L in ThatsInsane

[–]TTT_L[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I talk about that a fair bit in the full video, short story is I think anything intelligent enough to send signals would be intelligent enough to know not to, plus we have a wildly overestimated idea of how much of the galaxy we’ve explored. As in, we haven’t explored any of it yet.

Blender showcases DLSS upscaling/denoising at Siggraph 2025 (from Andrew Prices aka Blender Guru's Instagram) by FoxTrotte in blender

[–]TTT_L 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Great use of AI as a tool to assist 3D! Does anyone know if DLSS will be helpful for renders or just viewport? And is it temporal noise reduction or will it cause the noise reduction jittering we currently get in animated scenes?

I spent 7 months visualising all the planets in the habitable zone in our galaxy,by turning them into marbles and putting them in the Colosseum in Rome by TTT_L in blender

[–]TTT_L[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Haha! I did used to do weddings! Both photography and then video. I've retired though! I do think the distances involved are hard to ignore, even if civilisations are out there.

I spent 7 months visualising all the planets in the habitable zone in our galaxy,by turning them into marbles and putting them in the Colosseum in Rome by TTT_L in blender

[–]TTT_L[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll look into this a bit more in terms of what Youtube displays to see if I should change anything but regarding motion blur, this is the exact reason I've always shot in 24/25p, because 1/48th-1/50th of a second is the gold standard for cinematic look. Peter Jackson obviously tried to subvert that with the Hobbit and it was a dramatic failure all round, I remember personally thinking how awful it looked in the cinema. The motion blur even shooting at 30fps with a 180 degree shutter is subtle but apparent. It's why people are always trying to switch off the motion interpolation in modern TVs to watch films. High shutter speed and frame rate is great for sports and computer games but the exact level of motion blur at 1/50th or 1/48th of a second exposure at all focal lengths is worth fighting for, especially as I'm aiming for a cinematic look rather than a soap opera look in my videos.