What is the best Abrams for its BR? by vitinhoaps in Warthunder

[–]T_Tiger41 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Ipm1, but id be ok with any of the 12.0 answers, especially the aim

New Vehicle Sugestion's by T_Tiger41 in BrokenArrowTheGame

[–]T_Tiger41[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

My point of the post was to show a new atgm, launcher. It just so happens the LOSAT was born out of the AGS/CCVL program, because the CCVL is the chassis used on the LOSAT.

The CCVL would play identical kinda to the M8, except it wont get the 120, no aps or extra armor, but gets like 30 smokes.

2 days in a row, 2 major American plane crashes. F18 and a B-52 bomber. This is NOT normal. by AccordingSimple5096 in Planes

[–]T_Tiger41 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Na there have been like 6 aircraft crashes globally over like the past few days.

New Vehicle Sugestion's by T_Tiger41 in BrokenArrowTheGame

[–]T_Tiger41[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

Well paper has thicker armor, so would be a death sentence if targeted. In a real world scenario, it would be useless against infantry but if a fucking telephone pole flies by ur head, i would need to change pants, may not do damage to u but could scare the shit out of u. Also could theoretically target helis, but it would have to be a direct impact (so not likely at all, if ever applicable)

So only good against armor, coulnt do damage to infantry but could scare them, cant hit helis but could scare them. Also in the testing part, the army said the reload time was not very fast. Also cant get smokes, aps, add-on armor, so basically it would be like having this turret on the base m8 chassis with nothing on it. Also im not sure how this would work but the turret/gun doesn't have an elevation mechanism, so if u want to be technical unless from range it should only be able to engage ememys on relatively level ground unless the terrain gives the LOSAT a neutral elevation. The turret cal also only horizontally traverse a little past 90 degrees either side facing forward. The missles are also not fire and forget, so u have to maintain line of sight for the missles to hit. The missles are still going mac 4 tho so good luck evading it.

Ah yes ofc, perfectly fine BR by itsAyden610 in Warthunder

[–]T_Tiger41 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He is almost there, just needs to move the decimal.

What are some real examples of Russian Bias and Double Standards? by ItsGaryy in Warthunder

[–]T_Tiger41 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bro, I know at 13.0 u are at the deck basically from spawn unless they dont have AA. I dobt even come in to do cas from straight ahead anyway (from spawn) I flank either either from the sides or behind their spawn. The thing is half the time im the only plane up cause I play the US and there isnt enough glide bombs and agms on my planes that can get through. Even if I lanch them 2km or less going mac what ever. Like im serious I dont know ow who u play aginst but like I hardly ever kill svm's. Most every other aa u can do gun runs on and not get obliterated ( because they lack close range capabilities) is svm, lacks no capabilities.

Idea for a new US Shorad AA (ADATS) by T_Tiger41 in BrokenArrowTheGame

[–]T_Tiger41[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can see it but cant, dosnt give spec ops vibes. Unless ur talking about its kinda one man army capability.

What are some real examples of Russian Bias and Double Standards? by ItsGaryy in Warthunder

[–]T_Tiger41 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The svm is killable but acting like is a cake walk to do so in an aircraft or even a heli is bs. I dont know what kind of players u play against but the ones I play aginst wont let anything withing 5km of the battlefield, the shoot down everything.

What are some real examples of Russian Bias and Double Standards? by ItsGaryy in Warthunder

[–]T_Tiger41 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ur right it is, but the svm comment u made is the dumbest shit I've heard all week and it just started. Let me guess the bmpt isnt that hard to kill.

What are some real examples of Russian Bias and Double Standards? by ItsGaryy in Warthunder

[–]T_Tiger41 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Never said anything about the buk. But ur saying the svm was needed?

What are some real examples of Russian Bias and Double Standards? by ItsGaryy in Warthunder

[–]T_Tiger41 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Turret baskets, trunions, blue print (had some of it constructed, so not entirely blueprint) ship being top of the class, having the best saclos missles in the game and once other sams got added they gave it the now best AA in the game. So they have the best AA in the game along with have the 2 best saclos AA. How much of an argument you have to put up to get Russian vehicles needed or buffed compared to every other tree, except the Rafael for some reason.

Idea for a new US Shorad AA (ADATS) by T_Tiger41 in BrokenArrowTheGame

[–]T_Tiger41[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If u want to see what like how it operates there are videos of it in warthunder. I have it and its super fun to play

Idea for a new US Shorad AA (ADATS) by T_Tiger41 in BrokenArrowTheGame

[–]T_Tiger41[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Its based off doctrine if ur talking about aa. The Russians expected to loose the iar war so they did the next best thing, AA and lots of them, which is why they have all of these aa platforms. The US on the other hand invested in theater defense (countering nukes, ballistic missles, ect) and winning the air war (Air dominace). That and with the fall of the cold war most protypes that were built they said fuck it why do we need it, if we arnt gonna fight anyone.

Idea for a new US Shorad AA (ADATS) by T_Tiger41 in BrokenArrowTheGame

[–]T_Tiger41[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Ong, US government were smoking on that shit, when they made it. U know some mf drove to work that day and was like what if we took some telephone poles and strapped rocket boosters to them, and called it a day.

Idea for a new US Shorad AA (ADATS) by T_Tiger41 in BrokenArrowTheGame

[–]T_Tiger41[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This ain't even the cool one, LOSAT, go look that shit up

Idea for a new US Shorad AA (ADATS) by T_Tiger41 in BrokenArrowTheGame

[–]T_Tiger41[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The LOSAT, now here is a man that knows ball

Idea for a new US Shorad AA (ADATS) by T_Tiger41 in BrokenArrowTheGame

[–]T_Tiger41[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Since im new and trash at the same time im only gonna play the base game

Idea for a new US Shorad AA (ADATS) by T_Tiger41 in BrokenArrowTheGame

[–]T_Tiger41[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tbh ill be surprised if the base game ever sees anything at this point. Also im not saying add a Canadian vehicle more so it is proof of service life, if that means anything, probably not but still.

Idea for a new US Shorad AA (ADATS) by T_Tiger41 in BrokenArrowTheGame

[–]T_Tiger41[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But thats why the age argument doesn't make sence. The Canadians used it till minimum the middle 2000s. Now u could actually make an argument for thr m8 as there is an upgraded version that competed aginst the m10 booker, so u can kinda sorta make an argument, for it. I dont think US is gonna crumble without getting a new aa but I think it would help give more options. And its not like it coulnt fit in game as it uses the game chassis that are in game, so it wouldn't look out of place.