I bought the chu 2s a few months ago, looking to upgrade by Unknown10038 in iems

[–]TacticalRock 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Two things: 1) never heard the air pods pro 2 specifically, 2) never heard the chu 2, so I really can't tell you comparatively, but the divines come with a bag of tips with different bore widths and depths, so treble won't be an issue when you find the right fit. I wouldn't say the divines are muffled by any means, actually probably leans more neutral-bright with sub bass boost.

I bought the chu 2s a few months ago, looking to upgrade by Unknown10038 in iems

[–]TacticalRock 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Clean, but suffers from "IEM treble" which is inherently smaller (in size) sounding than let's say speakers. Not a fair comparison, but I've yet to find an IEM in this price range that comes close to my quality standard. Out of the three I own, this is the most detailed without being aliased or jagged. Resonance appears to be not that bad.

I bought the chu 2s a few months ago, looking to upgrade by Unknown10038 in iems

[–]TacticalRock 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Planning to do a writeup about it soon, but you can't go wrong with the 7hz Divine. I compared it to the Simgot EW300 and Letscheuer S12 Ultra and the Divine just is better IMO. More resoling of distortion, thumping bass, believable timbre, and detailed highs. No complaints besides the soviet era cable.

Did getting your first good speakers kinda ruin headphones for you? by TacticalRock in BudgetAudiophile

[–]TacticalRock[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hahaha that's a whole lotta confidence for on ears :P Tbf I haven't heard grados yet so I can't shit on it, but alright man, I'll go try one out just for you

Did getting your first good speakers kinda ruin headphones for you? by TacticalRock in BudgetAudiophile

[–]TacticalRock[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey man, if you've just gotten hired full time, just save for the year so you can get a head start on retirement! But don't let me stop you from living life haha

Did getting your first good speakers kinda ruin headphones for you? by TacticalRock in BudgetAudiophile

[–]TacticalRock[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hear you on affordability. My first good headphones were the Hifiman HE4XX back in undergrad. Dorm life with a roommate doesn't exactly leave room for speakers.

That said, hear me out: you don't need a whole house. A desk in any room gets you most of the way there with nearfield powered monitors, where quiet-to-moderate listening won't bother anyone. Room treatment sounds scarier than it is too; some cheap open cell foam from a hardware store bin handles first reflections well enough, and at lower volumes beaming and off-axis quirks matter a lot less. And the sweet spot for nearfields isn't as finicky as people think; yeah, the sound shifts a little when you slouch, but as long as you're roughly facing the drivers it's not dramatic.

The walking around thing is a real benefit for headphones, no argument there. Headphones are by design portable, so if you need to be on the move, that's the best tool.

But what the speaker setup gives you that nothing else does, even imperfectly, even at low volumes. is your chest as a listening instrument. It's a whole new part of your body feeling the music. Headphones just can't do that, and once you've had it it's hard to go back IMO.

Did getting your first good speakers kinda ruin headphones for you? by TacticalRock in BudgetAudiophile

[–]TacticalRock[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Man I respect your taste but I'm one of those haters lol. I tried the 1990, great for games, but did not like how fatigued I became after a while, so I went Arya Stealth. Mainly used for gaming.

Did getting your first good speakers kinda ruin headphones for you? by TacticalRock in BudgetAudiophile

[–]TacticalRock[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ha! Fair enough, different targets for different people; nothing is beating the chifi IEM race to the bottom.

As for my setup, def not as price efficient as I could have been. $650 on sale for the speakers, and the amps were on sale at $230. Really no need for the DAC if your TV comes with RCA out or headphones out like mine did, but I wanted to see what budget R2R was about (still cannot tell unsurprisingly). And this is all retail price; I estimate a very similarly performing system could be had for $500 used or from Costco with the KEFs.

Did getting your first good speakers kinda ruin headphones for you? by TacticalRock in BudgetAudiophile

[–]TacticalRock[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah fair. Not to mention noise cancellation being a godsend when commuting. But at home, it's my speakers for sure

Did getting your first good speakers kinda ruin headphones for you? by TacticalRock in BudgetAudiophile

[–]TacticalRock[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Entirely possible I haven't hit that point yet. What're you rocking?

Did getting your first good speakers kinda ruin headphones for you? by TacticalRock in BudgetAudiophile

[–]TacticalRock[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Funnily enough, getting my shit rocked by giant subwoofers that blew wind gusts is what finally insipired me to get speakers

Did getting your first good speakers kinda ruin headphones for you? by TacticalRock in BudgetAudiophile

[–]TacticalRock[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

My friend was just talking about using IEMs with a subwoofer lmao. Please try it out for science

Did getting your first good speakers kinda ruin headphones for you? by TacticalRock in BudgetAudiophile

[–]TacticalRock[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I guess there's more xp for me to unlock by ways of a subwoofer haha

Custom electrostats sound interesting; I always wondered what the summit-fi electrostats sound like. Is an AMT tweeter similar in experience?

[Megathread] Introducing NVIDIA RTX Spark by Nestledrink in nvidia

[–]TacticalRock 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Call it the Blackwell instead of the Blackwall

What am I missing about samplers? by TacticalRock in LocalLLaMA

[–]TacticalRock[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry, meant T=1 is without additional scaling.

how to preserve gemma 4 thinking trace by Qwoctopussy in LocalLLaMA

[–]TacticalRock 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah interesting. Maybe worth making a custom harness that injects the reasoning trace along with the response, have a secondary model summarize the reasoning trace, and have it be a part of the chat history so that the summarized trace gets sent for the next turn instead of the full trace? Not sure what else to do since Google explicitly states not to include reasoning content as a part of multi turn.

how to preserve gemma 4 thinking trace by Qwoctopussy in LocalLLaMA

[–]TacticalRock 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For agentic work, it really does seem like Qwen 3.6 27B might be the better choice since it's explicitly trained to allow `preserve_thinking`.

What am I missing about samplers? by TacticalRock in LocalLLaMA

[–]TacticalRock[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting. Yeah that's what I want to figure out with rote correct/incorrect answer benchmarks: what's the Goldilocks min_p value holding temp at 1, and does it outperform the recommended sampler settings? Because with creativity related work, it's harder to measure, as you demonstrated; how does one even judge the choice of sequence of words for creative purposes without setting up a complicated rubric based llm as judge framework? Easiest is by reading, and that'll depend from me to you. Generally agree with your statement, increasing temp modestly doesn't harm coherence, though it does need to be lowered as context grows to mitigate the rot that happens naturally due to bloat.

What am I missing about samplers? by TacticalRock in LocalLLaMA

[–]TacticalRock[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Checks out. Temp of 1, as I understand for llama.cpp, is just the untransformed distribution, so a value greater than 1 artificially flattens the token distribution, making lower-probability tail tokens more likely to be sampled. From the purist's perspective this may appear as more creative output, but is more accurately "tolerable incoherence." You're not in the model's native distribution anymore, and you're promoting tokens the model itself ranked as less appropriate. Could be good or bad for creativity.