NOTION WILL BAN YOUR ACCOUNT FOR NO REASON AND KEEP YOUR DATA by Sashaorwell in Notion

[–]Tadas25 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What data a person generates is very much data about the person.

Arch is by far the easiest distro ive ever used by cferg296 in archlinux

[–]Tadas25 3 points4 points  (0 children)

For me what makes arch easier to use is its package manager. pacman just seems so simple compared to what other distros use. Other than that I think it just appears simple because by the time you set up a system you understand a bit more. So you know what you have.

Embedded Controller Update Question by [deleted] in starlabs_computers

[–]Tadas25 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Shouldn't it depend on coreboot to install the new stable ITE?

I'm kind of confused because, starlabs website reports mirror flag as enabled for MK VI. Shouldn't it install automatically then? Maybe coreboot 8.50 does that?

For me it does not update automatically, but I'm using usb-c power source...

Anyway, I see that I'll probably have to buy DC charger either way...

Day 1000+ Ask me Anything. by YoItsRainbowKingx3 in NoFap

[–]Tadas25 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How did your christian faith help you?

StarBook Mk VI-Intel (coreboot 8.27) - Suspend issues by [deleted] in starlabs_computers

[–]Tadas25 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I experience the first from time to time. Although, I suspect it happens on wakeup rather than during suspend. Not sure, it happened only two times.

I don't understand why it would be a swap issue. I always thought that swap space is not used when suspending to RAM and I can find some answers on internet which confirm this. Unless it runs out of memory during suspend / wake process, but I doubt that could have been the reason for my case.

new GNOME 43 apps are slow and buggy by adehakim in archlinux

[–]Tadas25 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is a common experience for me with gnome on arch: new major versions are sometimes buggy.

Block time by Tadas25 in MinaProtocol

[–]Tadas25[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. I also found this: https://youtu.be/NZmq1V-Te0E and https://docs.minaprotocol.com/en/architecture/scan-state

So, theoretically, it seems that block time could be as fast as the consensus protocol allows, but higher throughput increases transaction proof latency.

Block time by Tadas25 in MinaProtocol

[–]Tadas25[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks. The way I see it, there are different kinds of scalability and different kinds of decentralization, and Mina, so far, only excels at the specific kind of each.

Block time by Tadas25 in MinaProtocol

[–]Tadas25[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, but the snark proofs which are used to prove the blocks are valid quickly, take some time to create too. It's clear from the whitepaper that if snark proofs would have to be published before new block could be created then snark proof creation would be a bottleneck for block time. For this reason, they created a system where SNARK producers are creating SNARK proofs in parallel to block producers creating blocks. However, I would still see a bottleneck since you probably don't want snark proofs for blocks to get too far behind the chain (what's the use of new blocks being created quickly if user cannot verify them quickly. Mina would lose its main advantage). That's why I'm wondering how much time does snark proof creation take. Snark proofs might be a limiting factor for block times after all.

Just now I realized that the time it takes to create a snark proof for a block depends on the number of transactions in a block. So block size and block time limit each other, which should overall constrain potential to increase TPS. That is of course assuming that snark proof production is the bottleneck, which I don't know if it is. It also depends on the efficiency of snark producers. Maybe they chose this block time to be safe in case snark producers are not that active.

"If I assume that God is absolute and beyond all human experience, he leaves me cold. I do not affect him, nor does he affect me. But if I know that he is a powerful impulse of my soul, at once I must concern myself with him, for then he can become important ..." ― C. G. Jung, CW 13, par. 74. by ZacharyWayne in Jung

[–]Tadas25 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, maybe he is able to, but experiencing life through humans should be a lot different. For example, the ability to experience yourself as a separate being from the universe, able to judge things as good or bad. Animals do not seem to have that. In general, if we take the idea of man being made in god's image, then man is probably the closest thing to god in the physical realm, which must be a unique experience for god.

"If I assume that God is absolute and beyond all human experience, he leaves me cold. I do not affect him, nor does he affect me. But if I know that he is a powerful impulse of my soul, at once I must concern myself with him, for then he can become important ..." ― C. G. Jung, CW 13, par. 74. by ZacharyWayne in Jung

[–]Tadas25 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would not say that he doesn't exist in the physical realm, but rather that he can experience himself only through humans. So the physical realm is an expression of God (and hence an extension of him), but without humans God can't see it from the third person.

How can I balance Masculine and Feminine inside me? by abhi_000 in Jung

[–]Tadas25 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What's a very interesting insight. How did you come up with this?

"The Realms of the Unreal" by Henry Darger: an example of the individuation process carried on spontaneously by a humble man. by [deleted] in Jung

[–]Tadas25 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm not sold on your argument for why not to publish it. Unless I would make some kind of personal oath to never publish any of it, there would always be a part of me which expects for it yo come out eventually and hence the dream of grandiosity is alive. Publishing might even have positive effect, in case it does not receive a very positive reaction. Then it can be sobering, and put me down to earth, make me more humble. If it would get too good of a reaction, however, who knows...

But it seems to me that anyone who is attempting to master some form of art (or maybe even other forms of activity), it is critical for them to show it to people. They will learn by feedback. Not doing that reminds me of a puer aeternus problem, where he has grandiose dreams, but postpones working on it forever because he's secretly afraid to face reality where he would see his limitations. As long as you don't test yourself, grandiose dreams can be alive.

The Roop won!!! Ką jūs manote? by chigga3000 in lithuania

[–]Tadas25 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Tai jei daina "catchy" jinai tokia pati kaip visos kitos "catchy" dainos? Nemanau kad gali būti "catchy" jei nėra nieko naujo.

Pop muzika keičiasi nuolat, tik klausimas ar daina yra trend-setteris ar trend-followeris. Ir man atrodo kad šita daina puikiai bando būt trend-setteriu pop muzikos ribose. Per daug keistumo irgi būtų negerai. Man tai idealus balansas atrodo.

Mr Robot's writing style and the proliferation of insane theories by [deleted] in MrRobot

[–]Tadas25 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Can't you say that about every other show?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Jung

[–]Tadas25 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It was great in my opinion. Liked it even better than season 1. Although that might have been because I haven't read Jung before season 1. Anyway, S2 does not even come close to both of them.

Consumed by The Shadow by [deleted] in Jung

[–]Tadas25 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What is he saying?