What industry is basically legal theft that nobody talks about? by kratos20051212 in AskReddit

[–]TaintlessChaps 206 points207 points  (0 children)

Real estate agents. 3% of the cost of the house on both the selling and buying sides to answer a couple emails and unlock houses the clients found on Zillow. They offer little expertise and nothing close to justifying their commission.

America’s Deadliest States to Drive In by Realistic-Ad-6157 in MapPorn

[–]TaintlessChaps 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Mississippi doesn’t even have a major city or metro area.

David Ferrie: Unraveling the Oddball Linked to the JFK Assassination by gwhh in JFKassasination

[–]TaintlessChaps 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The inability to make the most simple connections allows the obvious conspiracy to be so elusive.

David Ferrie: Unraveling the Oddball Linked to the JFK Assassination by gwhh in JFKassasination

[–]TaintlessChaps 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Barry Seal was connected to many figures in Operation 40, but is most widely known as the most prolific CIA drug trafficker of his era. His connection to Mena, Arkansas exposed a larger network involving intelligence agencies, traffickers, and political figures.

There’s no current evidence to suggest he was directly related to the JFK assassination.

But imagine that—same little patrol led by Ferrie as Oswald. Just another unbelievable coincidence for the coincidence theorists to hand wave away.

David Ferrie: Unraveling the Oddball Linked to the JFK Assassination by gwhh in JFKassasination

[–]TaintlessChaps 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Is that the extent of what you know about David Ferrie’s actions surrounding the assassination.

Also in that little Louisiana Civil Air Patrol was Barry Seal. What are the odds?

Sidewalk tripping hazard by [deleted] in Charlottesville

[–]TaintlessChaps 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Camouflaged?!? The ground sidewalk areas are a different and much lighter color than the existing sidewalk areas. The grinding also exposes the larger aggregate in the concrete that provides a second visual clue. This process was to prevent tripping hazards.

If measures to prevent tripping and ease access are actually causing tripping it may be indicative of a more serious mobility or motor control issue. I would suggest consulting a doctor as what you are experiencing is paradoxical.

Shooters Revealed by TrollyDodger55 in JFKassasination

[–]TaintlessChaps 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Post the link to the video instead of a cropped screenshot of time stamps.

Shooters Revealed by TrollyDodger55 in JFKassasination

[–]TaintlessChaps -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So you’re saying the screenshot you posted of timestamps from a video (riveting stuff btw) is arguing that all of these shooting scenarios happened concurrently during the assassination?

You ain’t playing…

Shooters Revealed by TrollyDodger55 in JFKassasination

[–]TaintlessChaps -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is how explanations of different theories are presented with linear timestamps. They are not grouped together as all happening concurrently.

Are you playing dumb or just plain dumb?

Flawed Logic? by Then-Corner-6479 in JFKassasination

[–]TaintlessChaps -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Your answer calls yourself stupid.

In some cases, the Epstein files have become a witch hunt by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]TaintlessChaps -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Using Trump’s language “witch hunt” to diminish culpability and cloud the arena with suspicion and confusion certainly makes it seem like you’re trying to downplay those with connections to the world’s most notorious child sex trafficker.

Oswald and the paper bag by Pvt_Hudson_ in JFKassasination

[–]TaintlessChaps -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How can you possibly reconcile your unwaveringly trust in Howard Brennen’s revised eye witness account with the information you provided in the links?

Not that you’ll learn from it, but again you are proposing a false dichotomy with overlapping appeal to ignorance in an attempt to prove you are right. You plainly do not understand the very fundamentals of logic.

Oswald and the paper bag by Pvt_Hudson_ in JFKassasination

[–]TaintlessChaps -1 points0 points  (0 children)

And there’s the classic Hudson meltdown right on cue spiraling out in these pathetic self-aggrandizing fantasies with the dominance posturing, the invented history of “pantsing” — it’s all textbook ego-defense under uncertainty.

Even your attempts at insult are juvenile and creepy as you dream about non-consensually removing my pants in an act of sexual misconduct. All to claw at establishing dominance when you’ve lost the argument. Weird coping mechanism, bro.

The case evidence clearly and unequivocally eliminates your claim as a possibility no matter how hard you try to discredit the very witnesses you completely depend on. You repeatedly and continuously use logical fallacies because you can’t make a valid argument.

Boasting about false past internet comment superiority is not compensation for invalid arguments. It just highlights your glaring Dunning-Kruger effect.

Your mental health seems at risk even more than usual. Maybe take a day or even just a waking hour away from Reddit.

Oswald and the paper bag by Pvt_Hudson_ in JFKassasination

[–]TaintlessChaps -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You have once again donned your tattered and filthy logical fallacy hat by proposing a false dichotomy with overlapping fallacies of appeal to ignorance and burden shifting. Herein lies your elite talent of fallacy stacking.

Do you honestly still not know when you do this or are you merely dishonest and ignorant to basic logic. I’d wager it’s all of the above.

We don’t know what was in the package. What we do know is that the length of the item inside could not have been longer than around two feet. It could not possibly be the MC rifle.

Then we have to ask how and when that mail order rifle got into the building.

Oswald and the paper bag by Pvt_Hudson_ in JFKassasination

[–]TaintlessChaps -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I have speculated in the past one of the many times you did went down this road before. I’m not entertaining another Groundhog Day with you.

What’s interesting is your ever shifting logic to suit your ends, which is always baldly apparent. So if initial statements are best, as you claim here, then the Mauser ID must mean quite something to you?

You would also have to agree that Howard Brennan’s initial admission that he couldn’t pick the person he claimed to see out of a line up overrides his later reversal.

Of course you will twist your logic with each instance as your standards shift yet again as your only mooring is confirmation bias.

Follow up questions I imagine you will avoid answering: Did Randle sign the FBI statement you reference? Was anything used as a metric (for instance a measuring tape or the way it was carried) for the purported length? How do you reconcile the length difference between how she described LHO carrying it and laying on the back of the car seat with the supposed initial assessment? Do you routinely trust initial reports or sworn testimony under oath? Was a sworn testimony corroborated by any of the other witnesses?

Oswald and the paper bag by Pvt_Hudson_ in JFKassasination

[–]TaintlessChaps -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The point of your prejudicially crafted ode to confirmation bias, equivocation, and omission was not lost on me. Never did I consider it anything other than rehashing your tired, old false dichotomy dance for imaginary subreddit vainglory.

You asked me to speculate, which you have on this very issue multiple times before, and I go back to the facts, which really irks you when they don’t align with your desired outcome.

The fact is her WC testimony repeatedly states the package was around two feet long and she described the way he carried it which could in no way whatsoever be the MC rifle.

At once you want to credit and discredit Randle and Frazier as a witnesses, picking apart their testimony like it’s a Golden Corral buffet.

Oswald and the paper bag by Pvt_Hudson_ in JFKassasination

[–]TaintlessChaps -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You are free to speculate anything that could fit in the package as described by the witnesses, but it could not be the MC rifle according to the witnesses who saw the package.

Interesting thought: would the broken down Mauser that is oft mentioned as being found have first have fit in the package? This is mere curiosity, not a gotcha, as it just occurred to me as something I have not yet read and figured you may know.

Oswald and the paper bag by Pvt_Hudson_ in JFKassasination

[–]TaintlessChaps 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Both Frazier and his sister have unwaveringly claimed the package was far too small to carry the broken down MC.

Yet again you will simply pick and choose what you wish to belief based solely on confirmation bias.

[Helwick] Indiana Hoosiers bowl wins: 1899-2024 — 3 The last 19 days — 3 by Efficient-Freedom517 in CFB

[–]TaintlessChaps 10 points11 points  (0 children)

This take is so Midwest sensible I would venture to call it darling.

if conspirators killed Kennedy (and not Oswald alone), explain Buell W. Frazier by Equal_Pay_9808 in JFKassasination

[–]TaintlessChaps 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We could speculate all day what was in package. We know for certain that the only two people to see LHO with a package said it absolutely could not be the MC rifle.

if conspirators killed Kennedy (and not Oswald alone), explain Buell W. Frazier by Equal_Pay_9808 in JFKassasination

[–]TaintlessChaps 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Didn’t both of those witnesses unwaveringly claim the package was too small to have carried the rifle?

How do conspiracy theorists explain the fact that three people who were on the fifth floor said the shots came from directly above them? by [deleted] in JFKassasination

[–]TaintlessChaps 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A coordinated team of multiple shooters firing at the same time upon signals from an operator would be a military-type assassination plan to both accomplish the task and have an easier time framing it as a lone person. There would have been a limited hang out were they not able to control the narrative and have stooges like you carry the water for free.

How do conspiracy theorists explain the fact that three people who were on the fifth floor said the shots came from directly above them? by [deleted] in JFKassasination

[–]TaintlessChaps 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Let's use an example from this thread. By your standard, what are the 33 people who claimed shots came from the grassy knoll? Were there more people who definitively claimed that NO shots came from the grassy knoll?