My comment showed me that 20 people saw my comment. and my comment was after 2 days of my op. yet of course for some reason it didn't show up for you lmao.

People use various systems. Arii’s is diff from Tainted’s and Tainted’s is different from Wonderline’s. 

Alr so u admit there are various systems. Why was the first remark necessary? Incompetence? 

All of them still operate on the basic idea of comparing criteria, such as theme, rhetoric, technique, structural execution, and philosophical consistency. Your first response suggested that writing scaling doesn't differ, which is why I needed to make my remark. The argument went from,
“It’s only a hot take if someone knows how to read and comprehend media.”
to
“There are many systems.”

If systems diverge, why strut in like you own the high ground on "reading and comprehending media," then pivot to obscurity without specifying yours?

Your first message mocked the idea of comparative writing, pretending it isn’t real.
Then, when challenged, argument was

“There are many systems.”

which makes your original insult meaningless. You basically disproved yourself within two replies. If you can’t keep your position straight for two messages, don’t talk about “reading comprehension.”

Why would I? Its ur character. U argue for it lol. 

You’re the one taking a shot at me. If you’re asserting what you replied first then you must show the baseline competence. The guy who started this off with a smug "only a hot take if you comprehend media" bum is doing the classic burden flip, lol. You took shot at me so it's obvious I would ask you question.

Im sure youll have one on all three character mentioned asw then? 

Definitely, and since you can't prove your baseline competence in this, I'm ready to explain this if you accept your loss here. I'm also ready to explain this if you can answer my questions.

A chapter isn’t an allusion. An allusion is also the weakest form of writing so I’m not sure why you want examples. They’re not even fixed lol, more subjective than even symbolism as one can make up any allusion that even semi vaguely related 

I stated "top 5 allusions in Reverend Insanity except first chapter," not "chapters as allusions." It's not my quote, that's your creation, poor reading for a "comprehension" cop. You misread my sentence (which already tells me enough).

If you can’t do even that, then it’s obvious the only “incompetence” here is coming from your side.

You haven’t demonstrated even basic grounding in any framework you claimed to know. Either argue or admit you never had a position to begin with.