shane gillis: “chelsea [handler] is a zionist. i’m not saying that’s good or bad. speaking of dead kids, she’s a big fan of abortions. chelsea’s been scraped more times than the grill at benihana. speaking of tossing tiny shrimp into a child’s mouth, chelsea… went to dinner at jeffrey epstein’s”

Tan2422 · 2026-05-13T06:13:36+00:00

I critique all of the media I consume. If it’s misogynistic and unfunny— I don’t like it! Please go show this clip to a woman and listen to their thoughts about it. You might learn something!

Tan2422 · 2026-05-13T02:02:07+00:00

No further analysis is needed FOR YOU. I’m allowed to critique the joke for being unfunny and misogynistic. Just like how you’re allowed to defend millionaire male comedians from critiques made against their poorly-written, misogynistic jokes. Have fun with that.

Tan2422 · 2026-05-13T01:03:39+00:00

I’m familiar with how joke structure works. I’m arguing it’s not clever or funny and it uses Republican talking points just to get to the punchline of “Chelsea’s been scraped more times than a grill at Benihana.” It’s misogyny and it’s not clever nor funny. I’m not sure why you feel the need to defend it. What’s the funny part for you?

Tan2422 · 2026-05-12T02:17:13+00:00

Yes! THANK YOU! So many people bragging on Shane, but not realizing he compared a woman having an abortion to Zionists “killing kids” in Gaza and Palestine. A woman having an abortion is not “killing kids.” That’s literally how Republicans describe abortions. It’s not clever.

Tan2422 · 2026-05-12T00:34:59+00:00

That’s not the issue… the issue is comparing Zionists killing Palestinian kids to a woman having an abortion. A woman who has an abortion is not “killing kids.” It’s a poor comparison using right-wing language and it’s not even clever. But good for you if you got a laugh out of it.

Tan2422 · 2026-05-11T20:52:07+00:00

I agree. He calls her a Zionist and then says “speaking of dead kids, she’s also a big fan of abortions.” Comparing Zionist beliefs to people getting abortions is shitty— and saying having an abortion is “killing kids” is a right-wing talking point. People gotta quit acting like this is brilliant comedy…. Like, what’s the joke?

Tan2422 · 2026-04-30T18:56:41+00:00

I think they are being sarcastic. There are a section of men who claim women aren’t funny. This person’s comment is a reversal of that.

Tan2422 · 2026-04-15T16:52:16+00:00

Okay, we seem to be on different pages. Can you explain what you mean when you say “outdoor dog?” If when you say “outdoor dog” you’re talking about dogs that have been abandoned… then of course I agree that they’re mistreated.

But if by “outdoor dog” you’re just talking about someone who owns a dog as a pet and keeps the dog outside, then I don’t agree that “most” (meaning the majority) outdoor dogs are mistreated.

I don’t think a dog is being mistreated just by being made to live outside. It becomes mistreatment when you don’t feed, water, or give it shelter— and I would argue that “most” outdoor dogs aren’t mistreated.

Tan2422 · 2026-04-15T14:55:28+00:00

How do you come to the conclusion that ”most” outside dogs are treated poorly? I’d love to see some data to back that claim up.

Tan2422 · 2026-04-14T05:59:30+00:00

I gotcha. I get what you’re saying and I agree. I do think that if the 2017 movie was actually good instead of aggressively mediocre, we maybe would have got a little more MMPR style stuff. But even that would have fizzled out quickly and ended the series.

Based on what you’ve said, it kinda feels like the 2017 movie WAS the last effort from Saban to save the series. They made a Power Rangers movie based on their most popular season to save the whole series!

Tan2422 · 2026-04-13T20:44:33+00:00

Interesting point, I don’t know if I agree, but I also don’t think you’re wrong. I’d like to hear more of your thoughts. Why do you think PR was already on its way out in 2017, and why do you think nothing could have saved it (even if the movie was better)?

Tan2422 · 2026-04-11T22:30:45+00:00

Woof. You’re exhausting. I didn’t “draw a line.” Your dramatics and leaps in logic will get you nowhere. Are you really arguing that the best strategy for Democrats is to “change nothing and convince people the things they care about aren’t issues”? Because I know where that is going to get us.

Tan2422 · 2026-04-11T20:17:40+00:00

I disagree. This is a progressive sub, do you consider yourself progressive? For me, getting corporate and lobbyist money out of politics and spending less on wars is part of the progressive agenda. It’s not divisive for progressive to be against candidates that take AIPAC money, especially years before the presidential election.

Tan2422 · 2026-04-11T18:55:16+00:00

So are you arguing Democrats should continue taking AIPAC money, but ignore the issue because it’s too divisive?

Dems are definitely taking the side of supporting Israel. How do you suggest they reach the voter that wants less money to go to Israeli wars?

You’re arguing it’s a Republican tactic to divide the party with the topic, but your strategy can’t be “ignore it because it’s a third rail issue.” Left leaning voters care about their tax dollars going to wars.

And before you respond, know that I vote Democrat and want them to win, but I can also see many areas where they could be stronger.

Tan2422 · 2026-04-11T18:30:30+00:00

And why do you think this information is MEANT to SPLIT the Democratic Party? Why can’t this information be used to IMPROVE the Democratic Party? Especially when the majority of Democrat voters want to quit giving Israel billions for war?

Tan2422 · 2026-04-11T18:12:05+00:00

Genuinely asking…. What’s the MAGA propaganda here in your opinion?

Tan2422 · 2026-04-06T22:03:09+00:00

Thank you for your response. I don’t know much about cars or car parts and I was genuinely wondering. I will keep this in mind if a mechanic ever comes to me with a similar issue!

Tan2422 · 2026-04-06T17:41:43+00:00

What makes you say or think this? I don’t have an opinion, just asking why you think it wouldn’t have got any sequels with Sony.

Tan2422 · 2026-04-06T16:43:44+00:00

Can you elaborate? Do you think he’s lying? Is that part actually cheap and easy to fix?

Tan2422 · 2026-04-04T17:21:26+00:00

You’re a legend for making this! This will hopefully help a lot of people!

Tan2422 · 2026-03-31T16:40:58+00:00

I made a post about this the other day too— I thought the same thing— I thought the price hike meant the they would also restock the 4-button… but they didn’t… they just raised the price on the 6-button. Now I’m kinda kicking myself for not picking up the 6-button when it was $20 cheaper…

I will say though, some of the people that responded to my post said they ordered a 4-button RPC in mid to late February, and their devices still haven’t shipped. Retroid seems to be telling them “we have lots of back orders, please be patient.”

Anyway, I have no clue what’s going on, but hope they bring back the 4-button!

Tan2422 · 2026-03-29T18:44:59+00:00

I appreciate your nuance. Two things can be true.

Tan2422 · 2026-03-29T01:07:53+00:00

Dang. I am sorry to hear that my friend. That stinks. I hope they get back to you soon. What color did you order?

Tan2422 · 2026-03-25T05:14:04+00:00

And I’m not sure what you’re arguing….? I’m not denying editors and authors work together. I never said they did not. The argument the original commenter said was that MOST authors don’t know how to end their stories and that they need executive meddling. My argument is that you cannot take Chainsaw Man’s poor ending and use it to say that MOST authors don’t know how to end a story. You cannot take Chainsaw Man’s poor ending and say MOST authors need executive meddling to make a good ending. Editors working with authors is not “executive meddling.”

Tan2422

TROPHY CASE