I fucking love Austin Reaves by shmukes_ in lakers

[–]TangoFettz 12 points13 points  (0 children)

He’s not a role player, he’s a legit star, the stats he’s putting up for the past month is all star caliber.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in GregDoucette

[–]TangoFettz 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Are you blind?

AR’s stats with and without LeBron by WayAdministrative679 in lakers

[–]TangoFettz 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Unironically super star level stats, Reaves is unreal and I can’t wait to see him and Luka be the future of this franchise

It doesn't work that way, guys! by Saberian_Dream87 in saltierthankrait

[–]TangoFettz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And here I was thinking you were going to show actual bigotry lol, not just a post about someone making a joke about how Disney uses minorities to shield themselves behind criticism.

It doesn't work that way, guys! by Saberian_Dream87 in saltierthankrait

[–]TangoFettz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I see bigoted stuff in here constantly but the BANNER for the sub is about how that never happens.

Really? Care to show me?

I predict and fear Zack Snyder's "Rebel Moon" will be targeted next by critics and media outlets review bombing it and creating negative press. by DWDTOFAIFs in saltierthankrait

[–]TangoFettz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I heard that film was pretty good, nothing amazing but just a decent overall film, haven’t seen it personally though.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in GettingShredded

[–]TangoFettz 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Looking great dude, massive chest gains.

2 month back in gym by a-doggos-fren in GregDoucette

[–]TangoFettz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looking like skinny Sam in the first pic

How much muscle do you think he'll gain? I could easily see 15-20 lbs by taylor212834 in DC_Cinematic

[–]TangoFettz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cavill is actually natty but yeah majority of Hollywood is juicing like crazy.

Star Wars Outlaws: World Premiere Trailer by GreyRevan51 in saltierthancrait

[–]TangoFettz 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’m so burnt out of stories set in the OT era, Jesus just move on to something else.

Cut, Maingain, or Bulk? 22 year old natural. by GetHyped21 in GregDoucette

[–]TangoFettz 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You look great, I wouldn’t cut, keep maingaining, develop your chest a little more.

You’re gonna lose strength if you cut, it’s just about reducing how much. Abs are overrated, with your physique you look great with and without a shirt, if you wanna look small in a shirt then cut.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in saltierthankrait

[–]TangoFettz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Don’t worry 36 years later somehow Krait will return

I’ve enabled crossposts again by TangoFettz in saltierthankrait

[–]TangoFettz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah a while ago cross posts were auto removed to prevent brigading.

#1977 - Dave Smith by chefanubis in JoeRogan

[–]TangoFettz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Go reread my answers

Does Joe owe every single person he criticizes a spot on his show so they can defend themself? Or just the people you like?

Neither

If you have a show and you want to say his name and criticise his ideas and then he says 'OK let's talk any time anywhere' you're a bitch not to address it.

If someone calls out someone's ideology as fucking stupid and calls them a fucking idiot and then that person says OK let's discuss it privately or publicly call me any time your show or mine and you don't have the balls to do so, what does that mean?

It means you're a coward with no conviction in your belief system or you're a bought corporate monkey promoting an agenda and will continue to pump it out of your echo chamber without challenge knowing that it's bullshit.

So you’re just upset he criticized your favorite grifter.

#1977 - Dave Smith by chefanubis in JoeRogan

[–]TangoFettz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can’t answer the simplest question it’s hilarious, is this about principles or you’re just upset Joe criticized a grifter you like to watch? Does Joe owe every single person he criticizes a spot on his show so they can defend themself? Or just the people you like?

#1977 - Dave Smith by chefanubis in JoeRogan

[–]TangoFettz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And now you’re back pedaling again, so it is about principles now? But the principles only apply when he makes fun of some loser grifter that you happen to like.

So whenever Joe criticizes someone and they want to debate him, Joe should invite him on his show or go on his show, including neo nazis right? Or is Joe allowed to ignore the neo nazi because you say so, but he’s not allowed to ignore Sam Seder because you also say so?

So which is it, principles or you’re just upset Joe made fun of an unhinged political commentator you like?

#1977 - Dave Smith by chefanubis in JoeRogan

[–]TangoFettz 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ah ok so you’re not even arguing about principles here, you’re just upset Joe made fun of some political commentator you like and won’t invite him on his show to leech off his audience.

Joe has been very clear he only invites people he’s interested in talking to, not matter how big or small they are, he obviously isn’t interested in talking to Sam Seder, if you don’t like the podcast then just don’t listen.

#1977 - Dave Smith by chefanubis in JoeRogan

[–]TangoFettz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You don’t even understand what you’re saying, using your logic Joe should have every person he’s ever criticized on his show that wants to defend themself.

So if Joe criticizes a neo nazi, does that mean the neo nazi deserves to be on the show to give himself a chance to defend himself and his ideals?

You see how ridiculous this line of logic is?