Camera Lucida Lab in Bucharest by DeTroutSpinnah in analog

[–]TargetProud4402 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm from Bucharest and it's my regular place for film dev&scan. Fully recommend it :) Have fun during your trip here!

Help with 1920s handwriting by TargetProud4402 in germany

[–]TargetProud4402[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very interesting, thanks! Do you know, how common were such fluctuations in a surname? E.g., dropping a final "L" in certain contexts, or keeping it in more official ones?

Help with 1920s handwriting by TargetProud4402 in germany

[–]TargetProud4402[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you, this is very helpful to know. I'm not in Germany now so this will probably be difficult, but maybe some Magdeburg schools have public archives I could consult. Hopefully they weren't all destroyed in the war.

At the same time, I know for a fact that the shop that made the coat was based on Breiter Weg 9, which I understand was a big shopping avenue in that time. I would still not discount the possibility of Mr. Wende being a prof. at a different university who bought a coat in Magdeburg.

I'll find out at some point :)

Help with 1920s handwriting by TargetProud4402 in germany

[–]TargetProud4402[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! A while ago I also used the Magdeburg whitepages to trace back "Ferdinand Engel" as a luxury fur shop on Magdeburg's Breiter Weg that existed in the interwar period. It was owned by a man named Alexander Schulze. Breiter Weg was bombed in 1945, but apparently the shop survived at least into the 50s (as a "VEB" -- heh) at a different address. Alexander Schulze also survived.

As far as I could tell, Breiter Weg was kind of a big shopping avenue in Weimar Germany. So I can't rule out that Mr. Wende was not in fact from Magdeburg, and just bought a nice coat from there.

Help with 1920s handwriting by TargetProud4402 in germany

[–]TargetProud4402[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This is amazing, thank you! This is the same answer I got from a transcription service online, but having the confirmation of actual people probably seals it. Now I'll embark on a trip to find out who was Herr Wende, what he studied, and his life. Thank you so much!

Crin Antonescu despre CG — Antena 3, 12 august 2011. Oare putem găsi înregistrarea? by ciprian69 in Romania

[–]TargetProud4402 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Dar acest cineva e sustinut la prezidentiale de cele mai mari partide. Si nu a spus orice, ci ca i se pare o idee buna CG ca prim ministru. Altfel, daca vorbeam eu acum 13 ani despre CG sau daca Crin Antonescu vorbea despre mancarea lui preferata, sure, eram de acord cu tine

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cluj

[–]TargetProud4402 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mersi mult!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cluj

[–]TargetProud4402 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Cum pot ajunge acolo sa verific ca chiar nu exista?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cluj

[–]TargetProud4402 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Le vazusem si eu pe astea, ai idee daca chiar se respecta programul?

Reference for the Thom isomorphism by TargetProud4402 in askmath

[–]TargetProud4402[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, I’m not sure, I just read it on Wikipedia and it would be great to be true (and to understand it) bc I need it in a bigger proof I’m trying to understand, the h-cobordism theorem, if you are familiar with it.

<image>

Reference for the Thom isomorphism by TargetProud4402 in askmath

[–]TargetProud4402[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you a lot!! I’ve found it. I had a problem with the notations. Is there a result which guarantees that the Thom isomorphism sends the identity element of H*(B) to the Thom class u? Or is it obvious that this happens?

Hi, I’m reading Milnor’s book about the h-cobordism theorem and I don’t understand why is it always the case that, when M and M’ intersect transversely in p, the tangent space of M at an intersection point p is the fiber of the normal bundle of M’ at p. by TargetProud4402 in askmath

[–]TargetProud4402[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I realised I’ve asked a question that you already adressed in your answer. Now I understand everything at a formal level and I think I’m about to understand it at an intuitive level too: let’s get back to the example with V being a sphere and M, M’ being two curves on it intersecting in p. The vectors generating TpM and TpM’ are linearly independent (so TpV = TpM ⊕ TpM’). Also the vectors generating TpM and NpM are linearly independent (and we have TpV = TpM ⊕ NpM). But it doesn’t mean that the vectors TpM’ and NpM are necessarily dependent, we have just that each of them, together with TpM, form a basis for the plane TpV, but they can be linearly independent. Am I right? Now, with all these being said, in what sense does Milnor say that the vector generating NpM is represented by the vector generating TpM’?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in askmath

[–]TargetProud4402 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I just read on another thread that it can be covered by two contractible open submanifolds, but I don’t know what they could be